Cited by 553Face Recognition and PerceptionFace recognition and analysisEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

Specialization of Neural Mechanisms Underlying Face Recognition in Human Infants

Open access
Haan, Michelle de, Pascalis, Olivier, Johnson, Mark H.·2002·Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Abstract

Newborn infants respond preferentially to simple face-like patterns, raising the possibility that the face-specific regions identified in the adult cortex are functioning from birth. We sought to evaluate this hypothesis by characterizing the specificity of infants' electrocortical responses to faces in two ways: (1) comparing responses to faces of humans with those to faces of nonhuman primates; and 2) comparing responses to upright and inverted faces. Adults' face-responsive N170 event-related potential (ERP) component showed specificity to upright human faces that was not observable at any point in the ERPs of infants. A putative “infant N170” did show sensitivity to the species of the face, but the orientation of the face did not influence processing until a later stage. These findings suggest a process of gradual specialization of cortical face processing systems during postnatal development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/089892902317236849

Cites

56 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 10 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. de Haan, M., & Nelson, C.A. (1998). Discrimination and cate- gorisation of facial expressions of emotion during infancy. In A. Slater (Ed.), Perceptual development (pp. 287-309). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
  2. Roisson, B, Gauthier, I., Goffaux, V., Tarr, M. J., & Crommelink, M. (2000a). Expertise modulates the N170 occipito-temporal component. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, Annual Meeting Supplement, p.73.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haan, M. D., Pascalis, O., & Johnson, M. H.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • Birkbeck, University of London (GB)
Venue
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Publisher
MIT Press
Published
2002-02
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
199-209
ISSN
  • 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8898
OpenAlex
W2100012722
Cited by
553
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 27
FWCI
10.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
face recognition (cognition), infant face processing, N170, electrocortical responses, upright vs inverted faces, species specificity, neonates
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Evoked Potentials, Visual, Face, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review