The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Lost Geographies of Power
Abstract
This original study explores the difference that space and spatiality make to the understanding of power. \n \nExplores the difference that space and spatiality makes to an understanding of power. \n \nMoves forward the incorporation of ideas of space into social theory. \n \nPresents a new understanding of the exercise, uses and manifestations of cultural, economic and political power in the second half of the twentieth century. \n \nIllustrated with cases and examples.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sovereignty Regimes: Territoriality and State Authority in Contemporary World Politics
Agnew, J. (2005) · Annals of the Association of American Geographers · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.2005.00468.x · Cited by 641
Trinity of change agency, regional development paths and opportunity spaces
Grillitsch, M., & Sotarauta, M. (2020) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1177/0309132519853870 · Cited by 587
Assemblage thinking and actor‐network theory: conjunctions, disjunctions, cross‐fertilisations
Müller, M., & Schurr, C. (2016) · Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers · doi:10.1111/tran.12117 · Cited by 409
Dallas, M. P., Ponte, S., & Sturgeon, T. J. (2019) · Review of International Political Economy · doi:10.1080/09692290.2019.1608284 · Cited by 320
Liu, W., & Dicken, P. (2006) · Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space · doi:10.1068/a37206 · Cited by 198
Metadata
- Authors
- Allen, J.
- Venue
- Wiley eBooks
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-01
- OpenAlex
- W1544199023
- Cited by
- 942
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 51.97
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lost Geographies of Power. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/9780470773321
- The paper
- Allen, J. (2003). Lost Geographies of Power. Wiley eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470773321
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
