Cited by 320Global trade, sustainability, and social impactGlobalization and political ideologiesWorld Systems and Global Transformations

Power in global value chains

Open access
Dallas, Mark P., Ponte, Stefano, Sturgeon, Timothy J.·2019·Review of International Political Economy

Abstract

Power has been a foundational concept in global value chain (GVC) research. Yet, in most GVC scholarship, power is not explicitly defined and is applied as a unitary concept, rather than as having multiple dimensions. Clarifying the concept of power has become particularly urgent in recent years as GVC research has proliferated beyond dyads of transacting firms or firm-state linkages and incorporated other stakeholders and mechanisms such as NGOs, labor unions, standards, norms and conventions. In this article, we propose a typology for the varied meanings and usages of power in GVC governance. We delineate two principal dimensions: transmission mechanisms – direct and diffuse; and arena of actors – dyads and collectives. Combined, these two dimensions yield four ideal types of power in GVC governance: bargaining, demonstrative, institutional and constitutive. We offer brief illustrations of these four types of power and provide an agenda for further research in the field.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09692290.2019.1608284

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Power relations among GVC actors play out very differently in different network structures.

    “Finally, power relations among GVC actors play out very differently in different network structures (Dallas, Ponte, & Sturgeon, 2019;Grabs & Ponte, 2019).”

    From Global value chains: A review of the multi-disciplinary literature (2020) · cites this paper as Dallas, Ponte, & Sturgeon, 2019

  • This power view is not universally applicable.

    “However, this power view is not universally applicable, as noted recently in Dallas et al. (2019).”

    From Global value chains: A review of the multi-disciplinary literature (2020) · cites this paper as Dallas et al. (2019)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dallas, M. P., Ponte, S., & Sturgeon, T. J.
Affiliations
  • Union College (US)
  • Copenhagen Business School (DK)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Dallas, Mark P.
Venue
Review of International Political Economy
Published
2019-07-04
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
666-694
ISSN
  • 0969-2290 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-4526
OpenAlex
W2963384915
Cited by
320
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 68 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 4
FWCI
43.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Review of International Political Economy (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • CBS Research Portal (Copenhagen Business School) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Globalization and political ideologies
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › World Systems and Global Transformations
Keywords
power, global value chains, GVC governance, bargaining power, institutional power, constitutive power, stakeholder power, non-governmental organizations, trade unions, standards and norms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review