Cited by 237Qualitative Research Methods and EthicsPosthumanist Ethics and ActivismAutobiographical and Biographical Writing

The Reflexive Journey: Mapping Multiple Routes

Finlay, Linda·2003·Reflexivity

Abstract

The prelims comprise: Introduction: myriad forms of reflexivity Reflexivity as introspection Reflexivity as intersubjective reflection Reflexivity as mutual collaboration Reflexivity as social critique Reflexivity as ironic deconstruction Opportunities and challenges Summary Acknowledgement References

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/9780470776094.ch1

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Finlay, L.
Corresponding author
Finlay, Linda
Venue
Reflexivity
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-07-22
Pages
3-20
OpenAlex
W1588274568
Cited by
237
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 11
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Autobiographical and Biographical Writing
Keywords
reflexivity, self-reflection, social criticism, irony, deconstruction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review