Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,784

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Statistical Methods in Diagnostic Medicine

Zhou, Xiao‐Hua, Obuchowski, Nancy A., McClish, Donna K.·2011·Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics

Abstract

The definitive resource for ensuring diagnostic tests meet the highest standards of statistical rigor and clinical effectiveness Statistical Methods in Diagnostic Medicine, 3rd Edition by Xiao-Hua Zhou, Jiarui Sun, Gene A. Pennello, Nancy A. Obuchowski and Donna K. McClish delivers the most comprehensive treatment of statistical methodologies for diagnostic test evaluation available today. The authors of the 2nd Edition – Peking University PKU Distinguished Chair Professor Zhou, Cleveland Clinic Professor Obuchowski, and Virginia Commonwealth University Professor Donna McClish – team with U.S. Food and Drug Administration senior mathematical statistician Pennello and doctoral researcher Sun to address a critical challenge facing medical professionals: ensuring that diagnostic tests used in clinical practice are accurate, methodologically sound, free from bias, and effective. This edition provides practitioners and researchers with the statistical foundation necessary to design, analyze, and validate diagnostic studies that can withstand regulatory scrutiny and clinical demands. The book has been thoroughly revised to incorporate the latest advances in diagnostic test methodology, featuring significant expansions in biomarker evaluation and benefit-risk assessment. The authors have restructured content to improve cohesion through integrated case studies that span multiple chapters, while updating each section with contemporary methods and streamlining discussions of older techniques to focus on the most relevant approaches for today’s diagnostic challenges. Readers will also find: Three entirely new chapters covering statistical methods for risk prediction, quantitative imaging biomarkers, and efficacy and effectiveness of biomarkers and other tests.Enhanced coverage of sample size calculations, accuracy estimation methods, and comparative analysis techniques for competing diagnostic testsAdvanced analytical approaches including methods for comparing correlated ROC curves in multi-reader studies and techniques for correcting verification biasComprehensive treatment of regression analysis applications in diagnostic accuracy research with updated methodological guidanceIntegrated case studies that demonstrate real-world application of statistical methods across different diagnostic scenarios and study designs Perfect for biostatisticians, applied statisticians, clinical researchers, and regulatory professionals working in diagnostic medicine, Statistical Methods in Diagnostic Medicine will also benefit graduate students and researchers interested in gaining the statistical expertise needed to design robust diagnostic studies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/9780470906514

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,784

Metadata

Authors
Zhou, X., Obuchowski, N. A., & McClish, D. K.
Venue
Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-03-14
ISSN
1940-6347 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1509445416
Cited by
1,784
References
0
FWCI
42.35
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Statistical Methods in Diagnostic Medicine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/9780470906514
The paper
Zhou, X., Obuchowski, N. A., & McClish, D. K. (2011). Statistical Methods in Diagnostic Medicine. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470906514

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.