The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Patterns of skeletal trauma inflicted during the Spanish Civil War
Abstract
This chapter discusses patterns of trauma to a group of individuals executed during the Spanish Civil War (1936–1939) and highlights three individuals as exemplars. It highlights patterns of trauma on male individuals as a result of state-sponsored violence. The Spanish Civil War may be directly responsible for the deaths of as many as 150,000 individuals throughout Spain. While the process of recovering and identifying these individuals is ongoing, it was not until recently that organizations and institutions began to formalize these efforts. From the remains in the present sample from Monte Costaján, it is clear that most individuals were shot in the back of the head; however, additional gunshot or blunt force trauma to the remains is not uncommon. This pattern of trauma is consistent with general witness statements regarding executions and with other attempts to examine traumatic patterns in Spanish Civil War remains.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Trauma analysis has indicated that most of those who were executed had gunshot wounds to the head, but patterns vary depending on the execution squad and the context (judicial/extrajudicial).
“Trauma analysis has indicated that most of those who were executed had gunshot wounds to the head, but patterns vary, depending on the execution squad and the context (judicial/extrajudicial) (see Refs. [27,28].”
From Twenty years of forensic archaeology and anthropology of the Spanish Civil War (1936–1939) and Francoist Regime (2021) · cites this paper as [27]
Citations
Cites
Making things public: Archaeologies of the Spanish Civil War
González-Ruibal, A. (2007) · Public Archaeology · doi:10.1179/175355307x264165 · Cited by 130
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- 10.1111/napa.12043 · DOI
- Cristóbal Villanueva E., 2003, Memória Arqueológica
- Etxeberria G., 2012, Exhumaciones contemporaneas en Espana: las fosas comunes de la guerra civil, Boletin Galego de Medicina Legal y Forense, 18, 17
- Haglund W.D., 2002, Forensic Taphonomy: The Postmortem Fate of Human Remains, 243
- Juliá S., 1999, Víctimas de la Guerra Civil
- Reig Tapia A., 1999, Memoria de la Guerra Civil. Los Mitos de la Tribu
- 10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.02.023 · DOI
- Ríos L., 2014, The Routledge Handbook of the Bioarchaeology of Human Conflict, 621
- Schmitt S., 2002, Forensic Taphonomy: The Postmortem Fate of Human Remains, 292
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Etxeberria, F., González-Ruibal, A., Herrasti, L., Márquez-Grant, N., Muñoz-Encinar, L., & Ramos, J. (2021) · Forensic Science International: Synergy · doi:10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100159 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Passalacqua, N. V., Brewster, C., Pinillos González, M. M., & Díaz, J. M. C.
- Venue
- Skeletal trauma analysis
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-05
- Pages
- 74-89
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
