Cited by 130Spanish Culture and IdentityArchaeology and Cultural HeritageHistorical and Cultural Archaeology Studies

Making things public: Archaeologies of the Spanish Civil War

Open access
González-Ruibal, Alfredo·2007·Public Archaeology

Abstract

The archaeology of recent traumatic events, such as genocides, mass political killings and armed conflict, is inevitably controversial. This is also the case for the Spanish Civil War (1936–1939), where the incipient archaeology of the confrontation is marked by bitter debates: Should this conflicting past be remembered or forgotten? Which version of the past is going to be remembered? What are the best politics of memory for a healthy democracy? The archaeologies of the war face manifold problems: the lack of interest in academia, which fosters amateurism; the great divide between public and scientific practice; the narrow perspectives of some undertakings; the lack of coordination among practitioners, and the threats to the material remains of the war. An integrated archaeology of the conflict, which helps to make things public, is defended here.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1179/175355307x264165

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. 10.1525/california/9780520235946.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Álvarez Martínez V, 2006, I Congreso del Real Instituto de Estudios Asturianos
  3. Álvarez Quintana C, 1997, Actas Simposio El historiador del arte, hoy, 133
  4. Bermejo Barrera J C, 1999, Genealogías de la historia. Ensayos de historia teórica III
  5. Besolí A, 2004, Ebre, 38, 181
  6. Besolí A, 2002, Apuntes de Arqueología, 10, ii
  7. Besolí A, 2006, Patrimonio Industrial e Historia Militar, nuevos usos en el urbanismo y la cultura
  8. Boletín Fundación Andreu Nin, 2006, Boletín Electrónico de la Fundación Andreu Nin, 53
  9. Boraine A, 2001, A country unmasked: South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission
  10. Dean J, 2006, Žhižhek’s politics
  11. Díaz-Andreu M, 1997, La cristalización del pasado: génesis y desarrollo del marco institucional de la Arqueología en España, 547
  12. Díaz Díaz B, 2005, Espacios fortificados en la Provincia de Toledo, 615
  13. Espinosa Maestre F, 2006, Hispania Nova. Revista de Historia Contemporánea, 6
  14. Foucault M, 1975, Surveiller et punir
  15. Fuentes A, 2005, L’Avenç, 299, 28
  16. Gassiot E, 2005, Mientras Tanto, 97, 95
  17. Gavilán E, 2004, La memoria de los olvidados. Un debate sobre el silencio de la represión franquista, 55
  18. Íñiguez D, 2003, Les Fosses d’Albinyana: Guerra civil 1936–1939
  19. Klausmeier A, 2004, Wall remnants – wall traces
  20. Laffin J, 1993, Digging up the Diggers’ war. Australian battlefield archaeology
  21. Latour B, 2005, Realpolitik to Dingpolitik
  22. López L, 2005, Espacios fortificados en la Provincia de Toledo, 595
  23. Mir C, 2006, Hispania Nova. Revista de Historia Contemporánea, 6
  24. Montero Barrado S, 2001, Historia y Comunicación Social, 6, 97
  25. Morín de Pablos J, 2006, Bolskan, 21, 181
  26. Nicieza I, 2006, La Nueva España, 12
  27. Núñez Díaz-Balart M, 2004, Los años del terror: la estrategia de dominio y represión del general Franco
  28. Olaizola J, 2006, IV Congreso de Historia Ferroviaria, 1
  29. Pérez-Juez A, 2002, Revista de Arqueología, 250, 22
  30. Pérez-Juez A, 2004, Patina, 12, 125
  31. Piñera L M, 2006, Patrimonio Industrial e Historia Militar, nuevos usos en el urbanismo y la cultura
  32. Pizzi D, 2005, Città metafisiche: città di fondazione dall’Italia all’oltremare 1920–1945
  33. Romero E, 2001, Itinerarios de la Guerra Civil Española
  34. Romero E, 2003, Ebre, 38, 77
  35. Ruiz Zapatero G, 1998, Iberia. Revista de la Antigüedad, 1, 37
  36. Santacana J, 2004, Ebre, 38, 169
  37. Saunders N J, 2002, Antiquity, 70, 401
  38. Sutherland T, 2005, Battlefield archaeology – a guide to the archaeology of conflict
  39. Thomas H, 2001, The Spanish Civil War
  40. Tremlett G, 2006, Ghosts of Spain. Travels through a country’s hidden past
  41. Valdeón Baruque J, 2004, Aranzadiana, 125, 106
  42. Virilio P, 1997, Pure war

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
González-Ruibal, A.
Venue
Public Archaeology
Published
2007-12
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
203-226
ISSN
  • 1465-5187 (ISSN-L)
  • 1753-5530
OpenAlex
W2142933980
Cited by
130
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
112.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Public Archaeology (publishedVersion)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Spanish Culture and Identity
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Archaeology and Cultural Heritage
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
Keywords
Spanish Civil War, war archaeology, memory politics, collective memory, commemoration, conflict archaeology, amateur archaeology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review