Cited by 112Forecasting Techniques and ApplicationsDelphi Technique in ResearchMulti-Criteria Decision Making

D elphi Method

Grime, Megan M., Wright, George·2016·Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online

Abstract

This article lays out the basic structure of the Delphi method, along with common modifications, and recently developed mixed‐model forecasting techniques. Delphi offers a basic structure that can be easily adapted to fit a group's needs, with respect to specific judgmental forecasting efforts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/9781118445112.stat07879

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grime, M. M., & Wright, G.
Affiliations
University of Strathclyde (GB)
Venue
Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-08-05
Pages
1-6
OpenAlex
W3168259267
Cited by
112
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online (publishedVersion)
  • Research Output (Edinburgh Napier University) (submittedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Napier Research Repository (Edinburgh Napier University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Forecasting Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Delphi Technique in Research
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Keywords
Delphi method, judgmental forecasting, group forecasting, expert consensus, forecasting methods

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review