The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Theory of Addiction
Abstract
An understanding of addiction theory is vital to understanding addiction itself. Theory of Addiction takes theory development from a simple â?~rational addiction modelâ?T, adding elements such as compulsion, self-control and habit, to explain the â?~big observationsâ?T in the field. As well as explaining and evaluating the arguments of each of the prevailing schools of thought, the book develops a new, synthetic theory of addiction that brings together the diverse elements of current models. Designed to enable students, practitioners and researchers to establish a starting point in the labyrinthine world of addiction theory, Theory of Addiction supports abstract thinking with concrete and realistic scenarios, underlining the centrality of theoretical understanding to working with addiction. â?¢ Presents a digest of major existing theories in one volume â?¢ Develops a new synthetic theory of addiction â?¢ Recognises the diversity of the experience of addiction â?¢ Discusses factors at the level of both the individual and populations â?¢ Provides key recommendations for the development of effective interventions
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The Capability, Opportunity, Motivation‐Behaviour model (COM‐B model) 16 suggests that a person's capability (i.e., a person's physical and psychological capacity), opportunity (i.e., external factors that facilitate behaviour) and motivation are involved in behavioural change.”
Citations
Cites
West, R., & Shiffman, S. S. (2004) · Cited by 8
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Michie, S., van Stralen, M. M., & West, R. (2011) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-6-42 · Cited by 13,697
Self-citationYardley, L., Morrison, L., Bradbury, K., & Muller, I. (2015) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.4055 · Cited by 1,442
Davis, R., Campbell, R., Hildon, Z., Hobbs, L., & Michie, S. (2015) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2014.941722 · Cited by 1,411
Time to retire the theory of planned behaviour
Sniehotta, F. F., Presseau, J., & Araújo-Soares, V. (2014) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2013.869710 · Cited by 1,406
“…self-regulation theories; Hagger, Chatzisarantis, Wood, & Stiff 2010) as well as theories with emphasis on temporal dynamics (e.g., PRIME theory; West & Brown, 2013) and temporal frames adopted by individuals when considering benefits and costs of behavioural options (e.g., Temporal…”
BackgroundDemographic and attitudinal determinants of protective behaviours during a pandemic: A review
Bish, A., & Michie, S. (2010) · British Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1348/135910710x485826 · Cited by 1,246
Metadata
- Authors
- West, R., & Brown, J.
- Corresponding author
- West, Robert
- Venue
- Wiley eBooks
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-08-20
- OpenAlex
- W2000231316
- Cited by
- 816
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 132 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 65 · 2013: 53
- FWCI
- 91.53
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Wiley eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
- Keywords
- addiction theory, compulsive behavior, self-control, habit, addiction intervention
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
