Cited by 1,411Behavioral Health and InterventionsHealth Policy Implementation SciencePublic Health Policies and Education

Theories of behaviour and behaviour change across the social and behavioural sciences: a scoping review

Open access
Davis, Rachel, Campbell, Rona, Hildon, Zoe, Hobbs, Lorna, Michie, Susan·2015·Health Psychology Review

Abstract

Interventions to change health-related behaviours typically have modest effects and may be more effective if grounded in appropriate theory. Most theories applied to public health interventions tend to emphasise individual capabilities and motivation, with limited reference to context and social factors. Intervention effectiveness may be increased by drawing on a wider range of theories incorporating social, cultural and economic factors that influence behaviour. The primary aim of this paper is to identify theories of behaviour and behaviour change of potential relevance to public health interventions across four scientific disciplines: psychology, sociology, anthropology and economics. We report in detail the methodology of our scoping review used to identify these theories including which involved a systematic search of electronic databases, consultation with a multidisciplinary advisory group, web searching, searching of reference lists and hand searching of key behavioural science journals. Of secondary interest we developed a list of agreed criteria for judging the quality of the theories. We identified 82 theories and 9 criteria for assessing theory quality. The potential relevance of this wide-ranging number of theories to public health interventions and the ease and usefulness of evaluating the theories in terms of the quality criteria are however yet to be determined.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17437199.2014.941722

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 40 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    Behaviour was most commonly measured by self-report methods (N=194; 70%).

    “Behaviour was most commonly measured by self-report methods (N = 194; 70%).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The review identified 82 theories of behaviour and behaviour change.

    “We identified 82 theories and 9 criteria for assessing theory quality.”
    • Also stated in: § Theories identified · plain
      “Eighty-two theories of behaviour and behaviour change were identified.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The four disciplines psychology, sociology, anthropology and economics are the relevant disciplines for identifying theories of potential value to public health behaviour change.
    • Rests on an assumption: The search strategy and sources were comprehensive enough to identify all relevant theories meeting the review's inclusion criteria.
  • Findingown data

    The remaining 23 theories were identified by the advisory group and/or through abstracts of retrieved articles.

    “The remaining theories (N = 23) were identified by the advisory group and/or through abstracts of the articles retrieved in our literature search.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The 24-member UK expert advisory group is sufficiently representative of the social and behavioural sciences and population health to determine the review's scope, methods, definitions and quality criteria.
    • Rests on an assumption: The search strategy and sources were comprehensive enough to identify all relevant theories meeting the review's inclusion criteria.
  • Findingown data

    Eighteen categories of behaviours were identified.

    “Eighteen categories of behaviours were identified”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Fifty-two (19%) articles addressed multiple health-related behaviours.

    “Fifty-two (19%) articles addressed multiple health-related behaviours”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 35
  • May combine two claims. 26
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingreasoning

    The literature identified in the scoping review reflects the search strategy aimed at identifying theories rather than exhaustively reviewing theoretically informed empirical studies.

    “the literature identified in the scoping review reflects the search strategy that aimed to identify theories rather than exhaustively review theoretically informed empirical studies.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Most articles reported interventions (N=168; 61%) or were evaluative (N=62; 35%).

    “most reported interventions (N = 168; 61%) or were evaluative (N = 62; 35%)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Thirty-one descriptive articles were identified.

    “Thirty-one descriptive articles (either primary theory sources or extensions of a theory) were identified.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    19 articles were found to be based on the same intervention or data-set, covering 9 interventions/data-sets.

    “This was found to be the case for 19 articles in total (covering 9 interventions/data-sets; see Tables 1 and 2).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingreasoning

    The final set of included articles was 276.

    “resulting in 276 articles”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Articles were published between 1977 and 2012.

    “Articles were published between 1977 and 2012”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingreasoning

    The review was labelled a scoping review rather than a systematic review.

    “we have nevertheless labelled what we did a scoping review.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    A further 20 articles were added through searching reference lists of included articles.

    “To these a further 20 articles were added through searching the reference lists of the included articles”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    The 23 remaining theories met the review's inclusion criteria but lacked retrieved articles that met the article inclusion criteria.

    “In other words, these were theories that met our inclusion criteria but did not have relevant articles retrieved from our search strategy that met our article inclusion criteria, i.e., articles did not fall within one of our four categories (descriptive, intervention, evaluative, review).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The search strategy and sources were comprehensive enough to identify all relevant theories meeting the review's inclusion criteria.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingnone given

    The review was informed by psychology, sociology, anthropology, and economics.

    “This scoping review of theories of behaviour/behaviour change of potential relevance to designing and evaluating public health interventions was informed by the disciplines of psychology, sociology, anthropology and economics.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The remaining 70 theories were applied fewer than 6 times each, with most applied once or twice.

    “The remaining theories (N = 70) were applied fewer than 6 times each in the literature that met our inclusion criteria, with most only being applied once or twice”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    A further four theories accounted for an additional 32 (12%) of articles: HBM (N=9; 3%), SDT (N=9; 3%), HAPA (N=8; 3%), and SLT (N=6; 2%).

    “A further four theories accounted for an additional 32 (12%) of the included articles: the HBM (N = 9; 3%), Self-determination Theory (SDT; N = 9; 3%), Health Action Process Approach (HAPA; N = 8; 3%) and Social Learning Theory (SLT; N = 6; 2%; SLT is a precursor of SCT).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Of 8680 articles retrieved, 6620 were excluded at title/abstract screening and 1804 after full-text screening, leaving 256 articles.

    “Of 8680 articles retrieved through the database search, 6620 were excluded at the first stage of screening (title and abstract) and 1804 articles (out of the remaining 2060) were excluded after full-text screening, leaving 256 articles.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Most of the research was conducted in Europe and North America.

    “with most of the research conducted in Europe and North America”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The cut-offs at either end of the specificity spectrum were agreed by consensus but were inevitably arbitrary.

    “The cut-offs at either end of this spectrum were agreed by consensus but were inevitably arbitrary.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingreasoning

    Behaviour varies in level of specificity.

    “‘Behaviour’ also varies in level of specificity: for example, physical activity includes sports which includes volleyball which includes running.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    It was not possible to categorise the identified theories according to disciplines because many had influences from more than one discipline or authors from several disciplines.

    “it was not possible to categorise the theories according to disciplines. Many of the theories had influences from more than one discipline and/or authors were from several disciplines or could not be categorised into any one discipline.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Behaviours are part of sequences, often dependent on previous behaviours and sometimes on other people's behaviours.

    “Behaviours are also part of sequences, often dependent on previous behaviours (e.g., carrying gym kit) and sometimes on other people's behaviours (e.g., others turning up for a team game).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingreasoning

    The review identified articles that use the theories in relation to the inclusion criteria.

    “the review identified articles that use the theories in relation to our inclusion criteria”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingnone given

    Many theories contained similar constructs or the same constructs but with slightly different names.

    “Many theories contained similar constructs or the same constructs but with slightly different names.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Theories as conceptualised in the review ranged from quite specific to very general, including multiple levels of influence.

    “Theories, as conceptualised here, ranged from quite specific (e.g., to a particular behavioural domain or type of intervention) to very general, including multiple levels of influence.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    Percentage agreement was used instead of Cohen's kappa because kappa is likely to underestimate reliability with unbalanced cells and multiple coders.

    “Since the data constitute unbalanced cells, we have used percentage agreement as it provides a more transparent and more readily interpretable parameter than Cohen's kappa. As kappa corrects for chance agreement among multiple coders, use of kappa is likely to underestimate reliability (Steinijans, Diletti, Bomches, Greis, & Solleder, 1997).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Steinijans, Diletti, Bomches, Greis, & Solleder, 1997

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Existing resources on behaviour change theories tend to reflect specific contexts and disciplines and are limited in the range of theories they cover.

    “Current resources on theories of behaviour change tend to reflect specific contexts and disciplines, and are thus inevitably limited in the range of theories considered (Agar, 2008; Conner & Norman, 2005; Glanz & Bishop, 2010; Glanz, Rimer, & Lewis, 2002).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Agar, 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Conner & Norman, 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Glanz & Bishop, 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Differences of views about inclusion were resolved through discussion and consensus with the other authors.

    “Differences of views about inclusion were resolved through discussion and consensus with the other authors.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Forward and backward citation searching and hand searching of key behavioural science journals were performed to reduce the chance of missing relevant theories.

    “Forward and backward citation searching, and hand searching of key behavioural science journals were performed to minimise the likelihood of relevant theories being missed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Dual data extraction was conducted independently on 60% of included papers by two researchers, with inconsistencies resolved through joint discussion.

    “Dual data extraction was conducted independently on 60% of the included papers by two researchers and inconsistencies resolved through joint discussion.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Articles were not excluded based on quality because the methodology for applying the quality criteria had not been developed.

    “We did not exclude articles based on their quality, since the methodology of applying these criteria has yet to be developed.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    At both screening stages, 30% of abstracts were independently screened by two other researchers.

    “At both screening stages, 30% of the abstracts were independently screened by two other researchers (each of which screened 15%) and inter-rater reliability (calculated using percentage agreement) was assessed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Effective behaviour change interventions tend to have modest effects, with substantial variation in short- and long-term effects.

    “for those that are effective, the effects tend to be modest, with significant heterogeneity of short-term and long-term effects (Michie, Johnston, Francis, Hardeman, & Eccles, 2008).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Michie, Johnston, Francis, Hardeman, & Eccles, 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    In practice, theories of behaviour and theories of change are sometimes difficult to distinguish, and some theories could be viewed as both.

    “In practice, it is sometimes difficult to distinguish between the two and some theories could be viewed as both.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The review's scope, methods and conduct were determined by a 24-member multidisciplinary expert advisory group.

    “Twenty-four UK experts from the social and behavioural sciences and/or population health research formed the advisory group, which determined the scope, methods and conduct of the review.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The 24-member UK expert advisory group is sufficiently representative of the social and behavioural sciences and population health to determine the review's scope, methods, definitions and quality criteria.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Theories of behaviour tend to be linear and explain why behaviour occurs by considering predictors, their associations, and their influence on the likelihood of behaviour.

    “Theories of behaviour tend to be linear, and explain the reasons why behaviour may occur by considering a number of predictors and their associations with one another and how these could influence the likelihood of a particular behaviour (Agar, 2008; Conner & Norman, 2005; Glanz & Rimer, 1997; Head & Noar, 2013).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Agar, 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Conner & Norman, 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Head & Noar, 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    A sensitivity analysis was performed to ensure the search results included key articles on behaviour change theories.

    “A sensitivity analysis was performed to ensure that the search results included key articles on theories relevant to behaviour change (identified through the initial scoping of the literature).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A review using the Theory Coding Scheme found that only 10% of theory-based intervention studies reported links between behaviour change techniques and theoretical constructs, and only 9% reported that all constructs were targeted.

    “A review investigating application of theory using the 19-item ‘Theory Coding Scheme’ (Michie & Prestwich, 2010), found that only 10% of studies of theory-based interventions reported links between behaviour change techniques and theoretical constructs and only 9% reported that all the constructs had been targeted by behaviour change techniques.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Michie & Prestwich, 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The TTM, the most frequently appearing theory in the review, has been criticised on several grounds and its empirical support has been questioned by systematic review findings.

    “the theory appearing most frequently in our review, the TTM, has been criticised on several grounds (West, 2005) and its empirical support has been questioned by systematic review findings (e.g., Cahill, Lancaster, & Green, 2010; Etter & Perneger, 1999; Littell & Girvin, 2002; Whitelaw, Baldwin, Bunton, & Flynn, 2000).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites West, 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Cahill, Lancaster, & Green, 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Etter & Perneger, 1999

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Theories of change tend to be cyclical and identify interactional and dynamic processes of behaviour change.

    “Theories of change tend to be more cyclical and identify interactional and dynamic behaviour change processes (Agar, 2008; Head & Noar, 2013).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Agar, 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Head & Noar, 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Inclusion of each theory was independently considered by at least two of the four authors and by advisory group members.

    “The inclusion of each theory was considered independently by at least two of the four authors and by members of the advisory group.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Neither the Theoretical Domains Framework nor the Grid Enabled Measures database specifies relationships between theoretical domains and constructs in terms of effects of one on another.

    “While both these approaches are of value, neither specifies relationships between theoretical domains and constructs in terms of the effect that one domain or construct may have on another.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Inter-rater reliability was assessed.

    “Inter-rater reliability was assessed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    To maximise effectiveness, intervention designers are likely to benefit from using a wider range of theories than is currently used.

    “Therefore, to maximise effectiveness, intervention designers are likely to benefit from drawing from a wider range of theories than currently used.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Definitions of theory and behaviour were agreed through a two-round Delphi process with the advisory group, retaining parts rated important by at least 50%.

    “In the first of two rounds of a Delphi process, advisory group members were asked to rate each definition and parts of the definition for potential use. When a definition (or a part of it) was rated as important by at least 50% of the group it was retained as relevant.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The 24-member UK expert advisory group is sufficiently representative of the social and behavioural sciences and population health to determine the review's scope, methods, definitions and quality criteria.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The application of theory is advocated as an integral step in intervention design, evaluation and evidence synthesis.

    “The application of theory is advocated as an integral step in intervention design and evaluation and in evidence synthesis, for example, by the UK Medical Research Council's guidance for developing and evaluating complex interventions (Campbell et al., 2000, 2007; Craig et al., 2008; Glanz & Bishop, 2010).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Campbell et al., 2000, 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Craig et al., 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Glanz & Bishop, 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    It is unclear how the previous consensus exercise on HIV-related behaviours reached consensus and how relevant its constructs are to other behaviours.

    “However, it is not clear how this consensus was reached and how relevant the included constructs are to other behaviours, given the focus on HIV-related behaviours.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    There have been calls for more operationalization, application, testing and refining of theories over many years, but advances are slow.

    “There have been calls for more operationalization, application, testing and refining of theories over many years (e.g., Michie & Johnston, 2012; Noar & Zimmerman, 2005; Rothman, 2004; Weinstein, 2007; Weinstein & Rothman, 2005), but advances are slow.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Michie & Johnston, 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Noar & Zimmerman, 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Rothman, 2004

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The review's purpose seemed more akin to a scoping review than a systematic review.

    “its purpose seemed more akin to that of a scoping than a systematic review.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    More general theories may have greater face validity but be less useable in guiding research than more specific theories.

    “more general theories may have greater face validity but be less useable in guiding research than more specific theories”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The relevance of a particular theory may vary across type of behaviour and according to the level of specificity.

    “Just as the relevance of a particular theory may vary across type of behaviour, so it may vary according to the level of specificity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Choice of theory will be partly guided by the purpose it is to be put to.

    “choice of theory will therefore be partly guided by the purpose it is to be put to.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Not only language varies across and within disciplines but so do epistemological and ontological assumptions and preoccupations.

    “not only language varies across and within disciplines but so do epistemological and ontological assumptions and preoccupations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The review attempted a combination of aggregative systematic review and configurative scoping review.

    “Arguably what we wanted to attempt was a combination of these two things”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Transforming the nine quality criteria into reliable scales or response options is a complex task and a study in its own right.

    “Transforming the nine quality criteria into forms, such as reliable scales or response options that can be used in evaluating theories is a complex task, and a study in its own right.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    There is a clear distinction between aggregative systematic reviews and configurative scoping reviews.

    “there is a clear distinction between aggregative systematic reviews that are ‘about seeking evidence to inform decisions’ and configurative scoping reviews which are about ‘seeking concepts to provide enlightenment through new ways of understanding’.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gough, Thomas, and Oliver (2012)

      Not checked in the free run.

52 of 52
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The four disciplines psychology, sociology, anthropology and economics are the relevant disciplines for identifying theories of potential value to public health behaviour change.

    “across four scientific disciplines: psychology, sociology, anthropology and economics”
    “informed by the disciplines of psychology, sociology, anthropology and economics”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The 24-member UK expert advisory group is sufficiently representative of the social and behavioural sciences and population health to determine the review's scope, methods, definitions and quality criteria.

    “Twenty-four UK experts from the social and behavioural sciences and/or population health research formed the advisory group, which determined the scope, methods and conduct of the review.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The search strategy and sources were comprehensive enough to identify all relevant theories meeting the review's inclusion criteria.

    “To be as comprehensive as possible we focused on both theories of behaviour and behaviour change.”
    “Forward and backward citation searching, and hand searching of key behavioural science journals were performed to minimise the likelihood of relevant theories being missed.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The number of articles reporting a theory is a valid indicator of the theory's empirical application.

    “These are listed in Table 1 along with the lead author, date of the paper that originally described the theory and the number of articles that reported using the theory.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Nine defining features are conceptually important for a good theory.

    “Nine defining features were identified as conceptually important for a good theory: (i) clarity of constructs – ‘Has the case been made for the independence of constructs from each other?’”
5 of 5

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Evaluative articles have an incorrect percentage

    Minor

    The 62 evaluative articles are about 22.5% of the 276 included articles, not 35%.

    Reported 35 · recomputed 22.463768

  • Discussion changes the total number of theories

    Minor

    The discussion says 83 theories were catalogued, while the results report 82 and Table 1 is numbered through 82.

2 of 2

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 88 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. House of Lords, 2011, Behaviour change. Science and technology select committee, 2nd Report of Session 2010
  2. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 2007, Behaviour change at population, community and individual levels [NICE public health guidance 6]
  3. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2010, Health systems and health-related behaviour change – A review of primary and secondary evidence
  4. Roe L., 1997, Health promotion interventions to promote healthy eating in the general population: A review
  5. Steinijans V. W., 1997, International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 35, 93
  6. Stephenson J. M., 2000, AIDS, 14, S115

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davis, R., Campbell, R., Hildon, Z., Hobbs, L., & Michie, S.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
Corresponding author
Michie, Susan
Venue
Health Psychology Review
Published
2014-08-08
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
323-344
ISSN
  • 1743-7199 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-7202
OpenAlex
W2132253094
Cited by
1,411
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 99 · 2025: 152 · 2024: 174 · 2023: 150 · 2022: 160 · 2021: 184 · 2020: 202 · 2019: 104 · 2018: 90 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 2
FWCI
3.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Health Psychology Review (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Medical Research Council (PHSRN10)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Public Health Policies and Education
Keywords
behavior change, public health interventions, intervention effectiveness, cultural factors, economic factors
MeSH terms
Behavior Therapy, Humans, Motivation, Psychological Theory, Public Health, Health Behavior, Behavior Control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-06.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-06.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review