Cited by 506Healthcare Quality and ManagementPatient Satisfaction in HealthcarePrimary Care and Health Outcomes

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Improving Patient Care: The Implementation of Change in Health Care

Richard P.T.M. Grol, Michel Wensing, and Eccles, Martin·2013·Wiley eBooks

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/9781118525975

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 505

Metadata

Authors
Grol, R. P. T. M., Wensing, M., & and Eccles, M.
Venue
Wiley eBooks
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-05-20
OpenAlex
W2475480659
Cited by
506
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 72 · 2020: 76 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 5
FWCI
32.89
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Wiley eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Healthcare Quality and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Keywords
patient care, quality improvement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review