The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Improving Patient Care: The Implementation of Change in Health Care
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In this article, we join others in arguing that the explicit application of theory could shorten the time needed to develop improvement interventions, optimise their design, identify conditions of context necessary for their success, and enhance learning from those efforts.4–9”
From Demystifying theory and its use in improvement (2015) · cites this paper as [7]
In the citing paper
“In this article, we join others in arguing that the explicit application of theory could shorten the time needed to develop improvement interventions, optimise their design, identify conditions of context necessary for their success, and enhance learning from those efforts.4–9”
From Demystifying theory and its use in improvement (2015) · cites this paper as [7]
In the citing paper
“In this article, we join others in arguing that the explicit application of theory could shorten the time needed to develop improvement interventions, optimise their design, identify conditions of context necessary for their success, and enhance learning from those efforts.4–9”
From Demystifying theory and its use in improvement (2015) · cites this paper as [7]
In the citing paper
“In this article, we join others in arguing that the explicit application of theory could shorten the time needed to develop improvement interventions, optimise their design, identify conditions of context necessary for their success, and enhance learning from those efforts.4–9”
From Demystifying theory and its use in improvement (2015) · cites this paper as [7]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–505 of 505
Das, P., Douma, G., Donkers, H., Roets-Merken, L. M., & Graff, M. J. L. (2026) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105939 · Cited by 1
“Nurses reported becoming more aware of inconsistencies between their values and routines, a finding consistent with Grol et al , 43 who emphasise the role of reflection in sustaining behaviour change.”
Hardeman, L. E. S., Hoogendoorn, E. M., van Benten, E., Nonnekes, J. H., Roerdink, M., & Geerse, D. J. (2026) · doi:10.2196/preprints.103337
Carvalho‐e‐Silva, A. P., Poh, J. H. K., Papic, C., & Rebbeck, T. J. (2026) · Musculoskeletal Science and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.msksp.2026.103627
Lin, I. B., Balmer, D., Smith, C. G., et al. (2026) · Australian Journal of Rural Health · doi:10.1111/ajr.70236
Metadata
- Authors
- Grol, R. P. T. M., Wensing, M., & and Eccles, M.
- ORCID
- Michel Wensing
- Venue
- Wiley eBooks
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-05-20
- OpenAlex
- W2475480659
- Cited by
- 506
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 72 · 2020: 76 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 5
- FWCI
- 32.89
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Wiley eBooks (publishedVersion)
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Healthcare Quality and Management
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
- Keywords
- patient care, quality improvement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
