Cited by 65Memory and Neural MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeurobiology and Insect Physiology Research

The Neuroethology of Predation and Escape

Sillar, Keith T., Picton, Laurence D., Heitler, William J.·2016·Wiley eBooks

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/9781118527061

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Multiple examples show that exchanging tools and concepts between behavioral ecology and neuroscience can be extremely useful for both fields.

    “Even if optimal research programs in the two fields at first sight have contradictory demands, multiple examples show that exchanging tools and concepts can be extremely useful for both of them.189”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sillar, K. T., Picton, L. D., & Heitler, W. J.
Venue
Wiley eBooks
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-02-26
OpenAlex
W2480677584
Cited by
65
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
3.15
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Wiley eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
Keywords
neuroethology, predation, escape behavior, predator-prey interactions, animal behavior, neural control of behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review