Trust and Economic Organization
Abstract
During the past four decades, the role of trust in the economy has gained increasing attention beginning with economist Kenneth Arrow's contention that trust is the lubricant of the economy increasing efficiency and saving on transactions costs. It is also important in the political realm, facilitating collective action. Robert Putnam, among others, contends that trust, as one component of social capital, is a key factor in the vibrancy of civil society. Both economists and social psychologists have used game theory and experimental methods to investigate trust and reciprocity. A key question remains How is trust maintained in the absence of monitoring, especially in the case of principal–agent relations? Economic historians and anthropologists have identified several mechanisms that serve to facilitate trust‐based interactions across space and time. In the context of organizations and management, a wide range of trust‐related issues have been explored, especially in the wake of Enron (a company no longer in existence) and the more recent failure of investment banks and other large financial institutions. At the macro‐level, Francis Fukuyama, among others, has explored the cultural underpinnings of differences in levels of general trust in various societies and its consequences for economic development. More recently, trust has become a central theme in the study of the sharing economy in which an astonishing array of goods and services is now offered by auction or exchange on the Internet. Detailed research on such enterprises (e.g., eBay, CouchSurfing, and AirBnB) is now possible through the development of computational social science.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Trust has been repeatedly identified as the most important driver of the long-term success of customer-to-customer (C2C) platforms.
“Hence, trust has been repeatedly identified as the most important driver of the long-term success of customer-to-customer (C2C) platforms (Cook & State, 2015;Strader & Ramaswami, 2002).”
From Antecedents of trust in the sharing economy: A systematic review (2017) · cites this paper as Cook & State, 2015
Cites
Social Trust and Fractionalization: A Possible Reinterpretation
Bjornskov, C. (2008) · European Sociological Review · doi:10.1093/esr/jcn004 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Antecedents of trust in the sharing economy: A systematic review
ter Huurne, M., Ronteltap, A., Corten, R., & Buskens, V. (2017) · Journal of Consumer Behaviour · doi:10.1002/cb.1667 · Cited by 456 · see citing works
Majorca's tourism cluster: The creation of an industrial district, 1919–36
Cirer-Costa, J. C. (2014) · Business History · doi:10.1080/00076791.2013.876532 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cook, K. S., & State, B.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- ORCID
- Cook, Karen S.
- Venue
- Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-05-15
- Pages
- 1-11
- OpenAlex
- W1563406225
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Wiley eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Capital and Networks
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Theory and Institutions
- Keywords
- trust, economic organization, social capital, reciprocity, principal-agent relationship, transaction costs, civil society, organizational trust, sharing economy, computational social science, Enron, financial institutions, game theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review