The Theoretical Foundations of Evolutionary Psychology
Abstract
The human brain is the most highly organized system yet identified, and natural selection is the only physical process capable of pushing the designs of species uphill against entropy.Consequently, all functional mechanisms present in our species' neural architecture were constructed by selection acting on our ancestors.The design features of our psychological mechanisms are therefore linked directly as cause and effect to the specific structure of ancestral adaptive problems, allowing models of the adaptive problems identified by biologists and anthropologists to serve as maps that accelerate the discovery of previously unknown psychological mechanisms.The brain's function is specifically computational: to regulate behavior, development, and the body in ways that would have produced responses likely to have promoted genetic propagation under ancestral conditions.Evolutionary psychologists and allies are working toward two goals: The first is the progressive mapping of the program architectures (circuit logics) of the neurocomputational adaptations designed to solve ancestral adaptive problems. The second is the reformulation and theoretical unification of the social sciences made possible by an accurate, natural‐science‐based model of human nature.Here we sketch the discipline's theoretical foundations together with illustrative empirical discoveries (in reasoning, emotion and motivational programs, and parametric coordinative adaptations).
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Evolutionary explanations typically involve integrating diverse data from different disciplines and thereby contribute to a more complete understanding of traits and human cognition.
“Moreover, they typically involve integrating diverse data from different disciplines (e.g., psychology, biology, anthropology etc.), and thereby contribute to the development of a more complete understanding of the traits at play and human cognition, in general (Tooby and Cosmides 2015).”
From What Is the Function of Confirmation Bias? (2022) · cites this paper as Tooby and Cosmides 2015
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 160 · Cited by 185
- Authors
- Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
- Venue
- The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-11-18
- Pages
- 1-85
- OpenAlex
- W2472751175
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 160
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
- Keywords
- evolutionary psychology, theoretical foundations, natural selection, human brain, adaptive problems, psychological mechanisms, human nature, reasoning, emotions, motivation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review