Cited by 185Evolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorAnimal Behavior and ReproductionEvolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation

The Theoretical Foundations of Evolutionary Psychology

Tooby, John, Cosmides, Leda·2015·The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology

Abstract

The human brain is the most highly organized system yet identified, and natural selection is the only physical process capable of pushing the designs of species uphill against entropy.Consequently, all functional mechanisms present in our species' neural architecture were constructed by selection acting on our ancestors.The design features of our psychological mechanisms are therefore linked directly as cause and effect to the specific structure of ancestral adaptive problems, allowing models of the adaptive problems identified by biologists and anthropologists to serve as maps that accelerate the discovery of previously unknown psychological mechanisms.The brain's function is specifically computational: to regulate behavior, development, and the body in ways that would have produced responses likely to have promoted genetic propagation under ancestral conditions.Evolutionary psychologists and allies are working toward two goals: The first is the progressive mapping of the program architectures (circuit logics) of the neurocomputational adaptations designed to solve ancestral adaptive problems. The second is the reformulation and theoretical unification of the social sciences made possible by an accurate, natural‐science‐based model of human nature.Here we sketch the discipline's theoretical foundations together with illustrative empirical discoveries (in reasoning, emotion and motivational programs, and parametric coordinative adaptations).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/9781119125563.evpsych101

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Evolutionary explanations typically involve integrating diverse data from different disciplines and thereby contribute to a more complete understanding of traits and human cognition.

    “Moreover, they typically involve integrating diverse data from different disciplines (e.g., psychology, biology, anthropology etc.), and thereby contribute to the development of a more complete understanding of the traits at play and human cognition, in general (Tooby and Cosmides 2015).”

    From What Is the Function of Confirmation Bias? (2022) · cites this paper as Tooby and Cosmides 2015

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 160 · Cited by 185

Authors
Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L.
Affiliations
University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
Venue
The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-11-18
Pages
1-85
OpenAlex
W2472751175
Cited by
185
References
160
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
Keywords
evolutionary psychology, theoretical foundations, natural selection, human brain, adaptive problems, psychological mechanisms, human nature, reasoning, emotions, motivation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review