The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Lean Product Playbook: How to Innovate with Minimum Viable Products and Rapid Customer Feedback
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Software startups were selected as our object of study due to these companies frequent use of prototyping to explore and shape their business models and product offerings, as part of the Lean startup method where new products are designed through continuously building, measuring, and learning what the customers want and are willing to pay for.
“Software startups were selected as our object of study due to these companies frequent use of prototyping to explore and shape their business models and product offerings, as part of the Lean startup method (Ries 2011) where new products are designed through continuously building, measuring, and learning what the customers want and are willing to pay for (Olsen 2015).”
From An empirically based model of software prototyping: a mapping study and a multi-case study (2023) · cites this paper as Olsen 2015
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
An empirically based model of software prototyping: a mapping study and a multi-case study
Bjarnason, E., Lang, F., & Mjöberg, A. (2023) · Empirical Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10664-023-10331-w · Cited by 75
Metadata
- Authors
- Olsen, D.
- Corresponding author
- Olsen, Dan
- Venue
- Wiley eBooks
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-05-26
- OpenAlex
- W4240441358
- Cited by
- 93
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 4.42
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Wiley eBooks (publishedVersion)
- International Linear Collider (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Innovation
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Product Development and Customization
- Keywords
- lean product development, product management, product innovation, customer feedback
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
