Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 158

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Using Logic Models

McLaughlin, John A., Jordan, Gretchen B.·2015·Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation

Abstract

Individuals responsible for designing, conducting, reporting, and using program evaluations are the primary audience for this chapter. The authors believe that program managers and staff will also find the logic model tool presented in this chapter useful for conceptualizing, planning, and communicating with others about their program. The logic model serves as a useful advance organizer when evaluators and others are designing evaluation studies and performance measurement systems. Logic models are increasingly used for program design and management. This usually requires development of a theory of change and means that more resources and time are needed to complete and update the logic model. The logic model describes the logical linkages among program resources, activities, outputs for customers reached, and short-term, intermediate, and long-term outcomes. Once this model of expected performance is produced, critical monitoring and evaluation areas can be identified. The chapter explains five stages in building a logic model.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/9781119171386.ch3

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 158

Metadata

Authors
McLaughlin, J. A., & Jordan, G. B.
Venue
Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-08-10
Pages
62-87
OpenAlex
W2473100710
Cited by
158
References
0
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Using Logic Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/9781119171386.ch3
The paper
McLaughlin, J. A., & Jordan, G. B. (2015). Using Logic Models. Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119171386.ch3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.