Cited by 63Sustainability and Climate Change GovernanceAgricultural Innovations and PracticesAgriculture, Land Use, Rural Development

Crafting actionable knowledge on ecological intensification: Lessons from co-innovation approaches in Uruguay and Europe

Open access
Rossing, Walter A.H., Albicette, Maria Marta, Aguerre, Veronica, Leoni, Carolina, Ruggia, Andrea, Dogliotti, Santiago·2021·Agricultural Systems

Abstract

Despite a wealth of analytical knowledge on factors and processes that operate to slow down or impede sustainability transitions in various sectors of society, design-oriented researchers face a lack of guidance on the ‘how to’ question for developing knowledge to support sustainability changes. From 2007, we crafted co-innovation as an approach for governance and management of change-oriented projects, combining three domains; a complex adaptive systems perspective, a social learning setting, and dynamic monitoring and evaluation. This paper sets out to describe the co-innovation approach and draw lessons from its application in projects on ecological intensification in Uruguay and the European Union. We used an analytical framework for evaluating sustainability transition experiments, which considers project features that provide insights into the contribution to sustainability transformations by project outputs, outcomes, processes and inputs, and their interactions. Empirical information on 6 cases from 3 projects was collected through in-depth interviews with former project staff, group discussion, and project documentation. This enabled a reflexive evaluation of co-innovation. Outputs showed substantial variation among the cases despite a similar approach to project governance and management. More significant contributions to sustainability transitions were associated with in-depth project preparation, a focus at the farm-level instead of the crop or field level, connections during the project's lifetime with regional innovation system actors, and frequent facilitated interactions among project actors to reflect on results, wider system implications, and project direction. We discuss the results in relation to the three domains of co-innovation. To enhance the role of projects in destabilizing currently unsustainable systems we highlight: reconsidering the role of projects as a business model; stimulating institutional learning from previous change-oriented projects; and making funding more adaptive to evolving project needs. With most of the budget for agricultural research-for-change spent through projects, how projects are conducted is a critical determinant of the rate of sustainability transitions. Effective disruption of unsustainable practices through project interventions requires rethinking linear cause-effect relations to include project governance and management approaches based on complex adaptive systems thinking, social learning settings, and monitoring geared to adaptation and learning.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103103

Cites

94 of 95 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 97 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Dogliotti, S., García, M.C., Peluffo, S., Dieste, J.P., Pedemonte, A.J., Bacigalupe, G.F., Scarlato, M., Alliaume, F., Alvarez, J., Chiappe, M., Rossing, W.A.H., 2014b. Co- innovation of family farm systems: a systems approach to sustainable agriculture. Agric. Syst. 126, 76-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2013.02.009. · DOI
  2. Elzen, B., Barbier, M., Cerf, M., Grin, J., 2012b. Farming Systems Research into the 21st Century: The New Dynamic 431-455. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4503-2. · DOI
  3. Geertsema, W., Rossing, W.A., Landis, D.A., Bianchi, F.J., Van Rijn, P.C., Schaminée, J. H., Tscharntke, T., Van Der Werf, W., 2016b. Actionable knowledge for ecological intensification of agriculture. Front. Ecol. Environ. 14, 209-216. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/fee.1258. · DOI · Paper page
  4. Gibbon, D., Dedieu, B. (Eds.), Farming Systems Research into the 21st Century: The New Dynamic. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp. 457-483. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-94-007-4503-2. · DOI
  5. Likens, G.E. (Ed.), 1989. Long Term Studies in Ecology: Approaches and Alternatives. Springer, New York.
  6. Gordon, I.J., T, H., H, P., Squire, G.R. (Eds.), Food Production and Nature Conservation. Conflicts and Solutions. Earthscan, London and New York, pp. 261-280.
  7. Wijnands, F.G., 1999. A methodical way of prototyping more sustainable farming systems in interaction with pilot farms. In: Härdtlein, M., Kaltschmitt, M., Lewandowski, I., Wurl, H.N. (Eds.), Nachhaltigheit in Der Landwirtschaft. Initiatieven Zum Umweltschutz, vol. 15. Schmidt Verlag, Berlin, pp. 365-391. Band.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rossing, W. A. H., Albicette, M. M., Aguerre, V., Leoni, C., Ruggia, A., & Dogliotti, S.
Affiliations
  • Wageningen University & Research (NL)
  • Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (UY)
  • Universidad de la República de Uruguay (UY)
Corresponding author
Rossing, Walter A.H.
Venue
Agricultural Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-05
Volume
190
Pages
103103
ISSN
0308-521X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3132455918
Cited by
62
References
97
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1
FWCI
4.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Agricultural Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Horizon 2020
  • European Commission Sixth Framework Programme
  • Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research Domain Science
  • National Agricultural Research Institute of Uruguay
  • European Commission Seventh Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development Environment
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Keywords
co-innovation, ecological intensification, sustainability transitions, complex adaptive systems, social learning, monitoring and evaluation, innovation systems, project evaluation, institutional learning, Uruguay, European Union

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review