Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 580

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Culturally Responsive Teaching

·2018·The ELL Teacher's Toolbox

Abstract

This chapter presents thirty-sixth innovative and research-based instructional strategy [culturally responsive teaching (CRT)] which teachers can use to support all levels of English Language Learners (ELLs). It describes this strategy by explaining what it is; why teachers like it; what research it supports, its common core connections, and its applications; and what could go wrong about it and its technology connections in more detail. Two of the most-common philosophies guiding how teachers of all races can be better teachers to students of color are CRT and culturally sustaining pedagogy (CSP). CSP is an emerging perspective that builds on the tenets of CRT. Although the focus of CRT isn't on meeting certain Standards, it is on leveraging students‘ cultural and linguistic tools in order for them to learn at high levels. Recent research has found CRT to be vitally important to educating ELLs with disabilities.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/9781119428701.ch36

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Venue
The ELL Teacher's Toolbox
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-04-16
Pages
351-357
OpenAlex
W2478869548
Cited by
580
References
0
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.