The DOI matches its Crossref record.
GDPR Enforcement
Abstract
This chapter examines how the rights and responsibilities of the Data Controllers and Processors under General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR) can be enforced under the scheme of the regulation. There are four ways to enforce GDPR compliance: through "in-house" modalities and mechanisms; by approaching the appropriate Supervisory Authority (SA); by going to court; and by having an Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR) mechanism in place. If the in-house mechanisms for resolving disputes fail, the next option open to data subjects would be approaching the SA. It is evident that any GDPR complaint or suit can be filed by the data subject directly or through a legal representative/attorney to represent their rights before the SA/court. Two scenarios for exercising judicial remedies against the SA are for appeal and delay. GDPR nowhere prohibits or allows a forum selection clause, leaving a vacuum in answering the issues.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“With the rapid growth of the IoT service industry, a large amount of data is being obtained and released through sensing devices all the time, and a large number of economic, social, and personal interests are represented in the data [115].”
From A Survey of IoT Privacy Security: Architecture, Technology, Challenges, and Trends (2024) · cites this paper as [115]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
A Survey of IoT Privacy Security: Architecture, Technology, Challenges, and Trends
Sun, P., Shen, S., Wan, Y., Wu, Z., Fang, Z., & Gao, X.-Z. (2024) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2024.3372518 · Cited by 172
Regulating Recommending: Motivations, Considerations, and PrinciplesPreprint
Cobbe, J., & Singh, J. P. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3371830 · Cited by 50
Diniz, J. M., Vasconcelos, H., Souza, J., Rb-Silva, R., Ameijeiras-Rodriguez, C., & Freitas, A. (2023) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/45823 · Cited by 4
A security study in Portuguese Public Hospitals - GDPR perspective (Preprint)Preprint
Santos-Pereira, C. (2020) · doi:10.2196/preprints.17896
GDPR:n valvominen, kirjallisuuskatsaus
Leinonen, L. (2023) · Jyväskylä University Digital Archive (University of Jyväskylä)
Metadata
- Authors
- Sharma, S.
- Corresponding author
- Sanjay Sharma
- Venue
- Data Privacy and GDPR Handbook
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-10-21
- Pages
- 233-267
- OpenAlex
- W4239673212
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1 (tdm)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
- Social Sciences › Law › Diverse Legal and Medical Studies
- Social Sciences › Law › Government, Law, and Information Management
- Keywords
- GDPR enforcement, data controllers, data processors, supervisory authorities, data subject rights, alternate dispute resolution, forum selection clauses, data protection law
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: GDPR Enforcement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/9781119594307.ch7
- The paper
- Sharma, S. (2019). GDPR Enforcement. Data Privacy and GDPR Handbook. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119594307.ch7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.