The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effective Learning in the Life Sciences: How Students can Achieve their Full Potential
Abstract
Chapter 1: Creativity ( David J. Adams & Kevin Byron). Chapter 2: Problem solving: developing critical, evaluative and analytical thinking skills (Tina L. Overton). Chapter 3: In the Laboratory )Pauline Millican & David J. Adams). Chapter 4: Fieldwork (Julie Peacock, Julian R. Park & Alice Mauchline). Chapter 5: In vivo work (Dave Lewis). Chapter 6: Research projects (Martin Luck). Chapter 7: Maths and Stats for Biologists (Dawn Hawkins). Chapter 8: E-learning for biologists (Jo Badge, Jon Scott, Terry McAndrew). Chapter 9: Bioethics (Chris Willmott). Chapter 10: Assessment, Feedback and Review (Stephen Maw & Paul Orsmond). Chapter 11: Communication in the Biosciences (Maureen Dawson & Joanna Verran). Chapter 12: Bioenterprise (Lee J. Beniston, David J. Adams & Carol Wakeford).
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Participants who iteratively engaged with ChatGPT generally performed better on tasks requiring logical reasoning and decision making.
“Reflecting on the findings of Adams [20] related to the use of data, the results suggest that participants who iteratively engaged with ChatGPT generally performed better on tasks requiring logical reasoning and decision making.”
From Exploring the Impact of AI Tools on Cognitive Skills: A Comparative Analysis (2025) · cites this paper as [20]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ulibarrí, N., Cravens, A. E., Nabergoj, A. S., Kernbach, S., & Royalty, A. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108594639 · Cited by 28
Digital Learning Ecosystem: Current State, Prospects, and Hurdles
Belessova, D., Ibashova, A., Босова, Л. Л., et al. (2023) · Open Education Studies · doi:10.1515/edu-2022-0179 · Cited by 21
“These patterns are re fl ected in the teaching of each speci fi c academic discipline ( Adams, 2011 ) .”
BackgroundTeaching Bioethics via the Production of Student-generated Videos
Willmott, C. (2014) · Journal of Biological Education · doi:10.1080/00219266.2014.897640 · Cited by 19
Crawford, B. A., Capps, D. K., DRIEL, J. H. V., et al. (2013) · Contributions from science education research · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-7281-6_12 · Cited by 14
Exploring the Impact of AI Tools on Cognitive Skills: A Comparative Analysis
Musazade, N., Mezei, J., & Wang, X. (2025) · Algorithms · doi:10.3390/a18100631 · Cited by 10
“Similarly, Adams [20] defines critical thinking skills as an important contributor to competence in problem solving.”
InfluentialIncreasing Classroom Interactivity at Unicorn College Using Advanced Learning Techniques
Beránek, M., & Kovář, V. (2016) · Cited by 1
González, E. A. P. (2016) · Creative Education · doi:10.4236/ce.2016.77099
“However it is necessary to consider also Ethics in the hidden curriculum in the learning process of many disciplines when is incorporated to their academic body not as a separate course (Potter, 1988, Adams, 2011, Weyrich & Harvill, 2013; Clarke, 2014).”
BackgroundByron, K. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-15347-6_9
Metadata
- Venue
- Wiley eBooks
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-10-04
- OpenAlex
- W290395388
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.87
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Wiley eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Social Sciences › Education › Science and Education Research
- Keywords
- life sciences education, effective learning, creativity, problem solving, critical thinking, laboratory teaching, fieldwork, research projects, online learning, bioethics, assessment and feedback, communication skills
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
