Cited by 361Study and Philosophy of ReligionReligion, Spirituality, and PsychologyReligious and Theological Studies

Spiritualities of Life

Heelas, Paul·2008·Wiley eBooks

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/9781444301106

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some recent work has emphasised the significance of personal somatic experience in yoga, underlying a trend in contemporary religiosity.

    “Some recent work has emphasised the significance of the personal somatic experience in yoga, underlying a trend noticed more generally in the landscape of contemporary religiosity (e.g. Heelas 2008).”

    From The development of modern yoga: A survey of the field (2009) · cites this paper as Heelas 2008

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heelas, P.
Corresponding author
Heelas, Paul
Venue
Wiley eBooks
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-04-11
OpenAlex
W4235420751
Cited by
361
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 55 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 12
FWCI
20.09
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Wiley eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religious and Theological Studies
Keywords
spirituality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review