The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Vulvar Pain: The Neurologist's View
Abstract
This chapter contains sections titled: Introduction An Approach to Vulvar Pain Management Conclusions References
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Other forms of treatment (for all forms of female sexual pain) include the use of cannabidiol (CBD, a compound derived from cannabis), botulinum toxin (botox) injections in the vulva and vagina, or vestibulectomy (the surgical removal of part of the vulva), 30 which seem even less likely to be acceptable options for these women.”
From TOWARDS A NEW UNDERSTADING OF THE CURSE OF EVE: FEMALE SEXUAL PAIN IN GENESIS 3:16 AND OTHER ANCIENT TEXTS (2020) · cites this paper as Gordon (2009)
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Van Dijk-Coombes, R. M. (2020) · Scriptura · doi:10.7833/119-1-1699 · Cited by 1
“30 For the use of cannabinoids in the treatment of female sexual pain, see Gordon (2009).”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Gordon, A. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Gordon, Allan S.
- ORCID
- Gordon, Allan S.
- Venue
- Female Sexual Pain Disorders
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-03-06
- Pages
- 169-175
- OpenAlex
- W1531378663
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2020: 1 · 2012: 1
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Genital Health and Disease
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
- Keywords
- vulvar pain, vulvodynia, pain management, neurology, neuropathic pain
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
