The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Contemporary Debates in Political Philosophy
Abstract
Acknowledgements. Introduction Thomas Christiano and John Christman. Questions of Method . 1. Facts and Principles G.A. Cohen. 2. Constructivism, Facts, and Moral Justification Samuel Freeman. 3. Reason and the Ethos of a Late-Modern Citizen Stephen White. Liberalism. Political Neutrality . 4. The Moral Foundations of Liberal Neutrality Gerald F. Gaus. 5. Perfectionism in Politics: A Defense Steven Wall. Liberty and Distributive Justice. 6. Individualism and Libertarian Rights Eric Mack. 7. Left-Libertarianism and Liberty Peter Vallentyne. Equality. 8. Illuminating Egalitarianism Larry S. Temkin. 9. A Reasonable Alternative to Egalitariansim John Kekes. Democracy and Its Limits. The Value of Democracy . 10. The Supposed Right to a Democratic Say Richard Arneson. 11. Democracy: Instrumental vs. Non-Instrumental Value Elizabeth Anderson. Deliberative Democracy . 12. Deliberative Democracy Russell Hardin. 13. Reflections on Deliberative Democracy Constitutionalism Joshua Cohen. 14. Constitutionalism-A Skeptical View Jeremy Waldron. 15. Constitutionalism Larry Alexander. Persons, Identity and Difference. Individualism and Community . 16. Individualism and the Claims of Community Richard Dagger. 17. Liberalism, Communitarianism, and the Politics of Identity Margaret Moore. Identity and the Politics of Difference. 18. Relational Liberalism and Demands for Equality, Recognition and Group Rights Anthony S. Laden. 19. Structural Injustice and the Politics of Difference Iris Marion Young. Global Justice. Cosmopolitanism . 20. Cosmopolitanism and Justice Simon Caney. 21. Distributive Justice at Home and Abroad Jon Mandle. Human Rights . 22. The Dark Side of Human Rights Onora O'Neill. 23. A Defense of Welfare Rights as Human Rights James W. Nickel. .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
What Is the Point of Equality?
Anderson, E. S. (1999) · Ethics · doi:10.1086/233897 · Cited by 3,095
On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice
Cohen, G. A. (1989) · Ethics · doi:10.1086/293126 · Cited by 2,917
Well-Being, Agency and Freedom: The Dewey Lectures 1984
Sen, A. (1985) · The Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.2307/2026184 · Cited by 2,714
Equality and equal opportunity for welfare
Arneson, R. J. (1989) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/bf00646210 · Cited by 1,970
Berlin, I. (2002) · Liberty · doi:10.1093/019924989x.003.0004 · Cited by 1,948
Considerations on Representative Government
Mill, J. S. (2010) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511783128 · Cited by 1,695
19. The Second Treatise of Government
Locke, J. (2016) · Democracy · doi:10.7312/blau17412-025 · Cited by 1,278
The Core of the Case against Judicial Review
Waldron, J. (2006) · The Yale Law Journal · doi:10.2307/20455656 · Cited by 1,266
What is Equality? Part 1: Equality of Welfare
Dworkin, R. (2018) · The Notion of Equality · doi:10.4324/9781315199795-6 · Cited by 1,180
Sen, A. K. (1980) · Cited by 1,088
Cited by
Breaking the filter bubble: democracy and design
Bozdag, E., & van den Hoven, J. (2015) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-015-9380-y · Cited by 375
Metadata
- Venue
- Wiley eBooks
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-04-17
- OpenAlex
- W193213265
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 9.53
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Contemporary Debates in Political Philosophy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/9781444310399
- The paper
- Contemporary Debates in Political Philosophy. (2009). Wiley eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444310399
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
