The Status and Conservation of Leopards and Other Large Carnivores in the Congo Basin, and the Potential Role of Reintroduction
Abstract
This chapter contains sections titled: Summary Introduction Large carnivores in the Congo Basin: historical distribution, recent decline and current status Is there a need for reintroduction? Acknowledgements References
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Primates and large carnivores appear extremely vulnerable and their populations plummet with intense hunting.
“Primates and large carnivores appear extremely vulnerable and their populations plummet with intense hunting (Henschel 2009, Oates 1996).”
From Empty forests, empty stomachs? Bushmeat and livelihoods in the Congo and Amazon Basins (2011) · cites this paper as Henschel 2009
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Empty forests, empty stomachs? Bushmeat and livelihoods in the Congo and Amazon Basins
Nasi, R., Taber, A., & Van Vliet, N. (2011) · International Forestry Review · doi:10.1505/146554811798293872 · Cited by 457 · see citing works
- Authors
- Henschel, P.
- Corresponding author
- Henschel, Philipp
- ORCID
- Henschel, Philipp
- Venue
- Reintroduction of Top‐Order Predators
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-03-27
- Pages
- 206-237
- OpenAlex
- W1578953196
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Keywords
- leopard, large carnivores, wildlife conservation, reintroduction, population decline (ecology), historical distribution, Congo Basin
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
