Methodological Principles for Language Teaching
Abstract
This chapter contains sections titled: The Methodological Pendulum On What Basis Advice, Then? Methodological Principles, Pedagogic Procedures, and Evaluation Criteria Some Relevant SLA Research Findings Implications for Approaches to LT Ten MPs References
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The methodological principles (MPs) are motivated by SLA research and by principles from the philosophy of education.
“The MPs are motivated by what second language acquisition (SLA) research has shown about how children and adults learn L2s successfully (Long, 2009(Long, , 2015, pp. 300-328) , pp. 300-328) and independently, by principles from the philosophy of education (Long, 2015, pp. 63-83).”
From In Defense of Tasks and TBLT: Nonissues and Real Issues (2016) · cites this paper as Long, 2009
Cited by
Sorted by citations
In Defense of Tasks and TBLT: Nonissues and Real Issues
Long, M. H. (2016) · Annual Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0267190515000057 · Cited by 359 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Long, M. H.
- Affiliations
- University of Maryland, College Park (US)
- Corresponding author
- Long, Michael H.
- ORCID
- Long, Michael H.
- Venue
- The Handbook of Language Teaching
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-07-10
- Pages
- 371-394
- OpenAlex
- W1567876312
- Cited by
- 76
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Second Language Learning and Teaching
- Social Sciences › Education › Foreign Language Teaching Methods
- Keywords
- language teaching, methodological principles, evaluation criteria, second language acquisition research, language teaching approaches
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
