In Defense of Tasks and TBLT: Nonissues and Real Issues
Open accessAbstract
ABSTRACT The first aim of this article, addressed in section 1, is to define what is meant, and not meant, by task and task-based language teaching (TBLT). The second is to summarize and evaluate 14 criticisms that have been made of both. Section 2 responds to five alleged problems with TBLT's psycholinguistic rationale, section 3 to six at the classroom level, and section 4 to three claimed problems with implementing TBLT in specific contexts. A few of the criticisms touch on important matters, but most, I will suggest, are nonissues . The third aim of the article is to identify some genuine problems in need of resolution— real issues —and briefly to illustrate research programs under way to address them.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
4 of 63 cited sources checked · 1 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
A large body of research (well over 60 studies) on recasts has shown that implicit negative feedback leads to substantial learning gains in grammar and vocabulary.
“a large body of research-well over 60 studies-on recasts, another device for achieving incidental focus on form, has shown that the implicit negative feedback they provide leads to substantial learning gains in grammar and vocabulary”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Goo & Mackey, 2013 source
The opening section says that more than 60 studies used the input-and-interaction approach, many finding positive associations between recasts and learning; it does not say that all 60-plus studies were on recasts or showed gains. “The Case for Recasts” reports large mean effect sizes and examples of grammatical learning, and “What Are Recasts and Why Should We Study Them?” classifies recasts as implicit negative feedback. The passages found do not establish substantial vocabulary gains from recasts; vocabulary development appears only in a reference title (page numbers unavailable). (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Li, 2010
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Mackey & Goo, 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Many of the 80-plus studies included in two statistical meta-analyses (Goo et al., 2015; Norris & Ortega, 2000) involved new language for the learners concerned.
“Many of the 80-plus studies included in two aforementioned statistical meta-analyses (Goo et al., 2015;Norris & Ortega, 2000), for example, involved new language for the learners concerned.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Goo et al., 2015 source
- cites Norris & Ortega, 2000 source
The passages indexed under this DOI are headed “Self-Monitoring and Self-Reflection in an English Blended Learning Environment,” not the named Norris and Ortega meta-analysis. Searches for the study count and for whether learners encountered new language returned no passage addressing either point, so this copy cannot verify the attribution. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisereasoning
Focus on form is but one of the 10 MPs for implementing TBLT.
“Focus on form (MP6) is but one of the 10 MPs for implementing TBLT by those already convinced by the rationale”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Evidence for the existence of developmental sequences is long-standing and robust.
“Evidence for the existence of developmental sequences is long-standing and robust (for review, see Ortega, 2009).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ortega, 2009 source
- Premisecitation
A second statistical meta-analysis (Goo et al., 2015) confirmed the earlier results.
“Eleven of the original studies, plus 34 new ones reported in the following decade prompted a second statistical meta-analysis (Goo, Granena, Novella, & Yilmaz, 2015), which confirmed the earlier results.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Goo, Granena, Novella, & Yilmaz, 2015 source
- Premisereasoning
Nothing approaching the quality and scope of the empirical work supporting focus on form exists in support of PPP.
“Meanwhile, nothing approaching the quality and scope of this body of empirical work exists in support of the favored PPP model.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
It would be patently absurd to suppose that explicit metalinguistic knowledge provided at Time 1 could never be used by learners at Time 2.
“As Swan suggested, it would be patently absurd to suppose that explicit metalinguistic knowledge provided at Time 1 could never be used by learners at Time 2”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
The research basis for TBLT is many times greater than it was 25 years ago.
“Twenty-five years later, the research basis for TBLT is many, many times greater.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given
Studies comparing classroom and naturalistic learners have found acquisition sequences to be broadly the same.
“studies that have compared classroom and naturalistic learners have found acquisition sequences to be broadly the same.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
The effect of oral corrective feedback was maintained over time.
“that the effect was maintained over time”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Li, 2010
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
L2 grammatical development does not follow an order externally imposed by a teacher or textbook.
“Research has shown that L2 grammatical development does not follow an order externally imposed by a teacher or textbook.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Widdowson's assertion that authenticity is inevitably a chimera is not true of TBLT.
“That may be true of PPP classrooms, but it is not true of TBLT.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Traditional LT approaches using a preset linguistic syllabus and PPP are inconsistent with research findings on interlanguage development and teachability.
“Traditional LT approaches using materials embodying a preset linguistic syllabus and delivered via various widely used incarnations of present-practice-produce (PPP)/focus on forms methodology are inconsistent with research findings on interlanguage development and teachability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
Teachers cannot teach whatever they want, whenever they want, if language learning is their goal.
“40 years of instructed SLA (ISLA) research and classroom studies have demonstrated that teachers cannot teach whatever they want, whenever they want, if language learning is their goal.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Developmental sequences have been documented in a variety of typologically different L2s.
“They have been documented in a variety of typologically different L2s (e.g., Bettoni & Di Biase, 2015;Bonilla, 2015;Johnston, 1997;Pienemann, 2005)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Bettoni & Di Biase, 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Bonilla, 2015 source
- cites Johnston, 1997
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
In a statistical meta-analysis of 33 studies, Li (2010) found a medium overall effect for oral corrective feedback.
“In a statistical meta-analysis of 33 studies, Li (2010) found a medium overall effect for oral corrective feedback”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Li, 2010
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisereasoning
Provision of explicit metalinguistic information is one of many possible PPs by means of which MP6 (focus on form) can be realized in the short term.
“provision of explicit metalinguistic information is one of many possible PPs by means of which MP6 (focus on form) can be realized in the short term.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
A considerable body of research has demonstrated that incidental focus on form works.
“Second, a considerable body of research has demonstrated that incidental focus on form works.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
Conscious awareness at the moment the learner detects the targeted item is not a requirement for uptake.
“conscious awareness at the moment the learner detects the targeted item is not a requirement for uptake.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
There is no evidence that developmental sequences can be interfered with.
“but more to the point, there is no evidence that they can be.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Instruction has failed to alter developmental sequences.
“as has the failure of instruction to alter them (R. Ellis, 1989;Håkansson & Norrby, 2010;Mackey, 1999;Pienemann, 1984).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
The cognitive-interactionist theory of ISLA underpinning TBLT embraces a necessary, principled, symbiotic relationship between incidental and intentional learning.
“The cognitive-interactionist theory of ISLA underpinning TBLT embraces not just incidental focus on form, but (among other processes and abilities) what theory and research findings in SLA show to be a necessary, principled, symbiotic relationship between incidental and intentional learning (Long, 2015, pp. 30-62).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Long, 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisenone given
A key characteristic of focus on form, negative feedback, and expansions is that they are reactive, supplied in harmony with a learner's current developmental readiness to learn.
“A key characteristic of focus on form, negative feedback, and expansions of various kinds, however, is that they are reactive, supplied in harmony with a learner's current developmental readiness to learn”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Swan's (2005) claim that there is no compelling evidence for incidental focus on form is wrong.
“In other words, Swan's (2005) claim is wrong.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Swan, 2005 source
- Premisecitation
The thousands of words advanced learners require, and the even greater numbers of collocations, are far too many to be handled explicitly through PPP pedagogy in the limited classroom time available.
“The thousands of words advanced learners require (Nation, 2006), and the even greater numbers of collocations, are far too many to be handled explicitly through PPP pedagogy in the limited classroom time available.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Nation, 2006 source
- Interpretationcitation
TBLT tailors input and feedback to individual learners.
“In contrast, TBLT tailors input and feedback to individual learners.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The reactive quality of MP6 and MP7 means that the timing of attention to grammar is more likely to be developmentally appropriate and occur at the most propitious moment for the learner(s) concerned, not arbitrarily, when predetermined by an unseen textbook writer.
“The reactive quality of MP6 (focus on form) and MP7 (provide negative feedback) means that the timing of attention to grammar is more likely to be developmentally appropriate and occur at the most propitious moment for the learner(s) concerned, not arbitrarily, when predetermined by an unseen textbook writer.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisereasoning
Attention to grammar and other code features in TBLT occurs in context, embedded in meaning-based activities, not in separate drill-and-kill sessions.
“Attention to grammar and other code features in TBLT occurs in context, embedded in meaning-based activities, not in separate drill-and-kill sessions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Students, including those of the same L2 proficiency, can and do learn from one another when working in pairs or small groups.
“Moreover, contra Bruton, students, including those of the same L2 proficiency, can and do learn from one another when working in pairs or small groups (Eckerth, 2008;Swain, Brooks, & Tocalli-Beller, 2002).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisereasoning
It is simply untrue of TBLT as a whole that it prioritizes oral output.
“Individual modules of task-based materials may prioritize oral output, but if they do so, it is because speech is relevant for the target tasks at hand, for example, some designed for tourists or for U.S. diplomats required to deliver celebratory speeches in Japanese (Hillman, 2015), but it is simply untrue of TBLT as a whole.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
The asserted emphasis on output is a fallacy.
“The asserted emphasis on output is a fallacy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
In TBLT, the teacher's role requires greater expertise than in PPP.
“The teacher's role in TBLT requires greater expertise, and is more important, more demanding, and certainly more communicative than in PPP.”
- Also stated in: § 5.3. In-Service Teacher Education for TBLT · plain
“Far from being downgraded, the teacher's role in TBLT is more important and requires more expertise than that of the teacher in focus on forms/PPP.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § 5.3. In-Service Teacher Education for TBLT · plain
- Premisenone given
The task-based materials students work on-alone, in pairs, in small groups, at the computer, or in lockstep mode with the teacher-constitute the major source of new language, just as they do in conventional PPP courses.
“it is the task-based materials students work michael h.long on-alone, in pairs, in small groups, at the computer, or in lockstep mode with the teacher-which constitute the major source of new language, just as they do in conventional PPP courses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Studies have often found LT materials writers' intuitions about language use to differ considerably from authentic language use, even in familiar everyday activities for which their textbooks are supposedly intended to prepare students.
“studies have often found LT materials writers' intuitions about language use to differ considerably from authentic language use, even in familiar everyday activities for which their textbooks are supposedly intended to prepare students (see, e.g., Auerbach & Burgess, 1985;Bartlett, 2005;Cathcart, 1989).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
In TBLT, the teacher's role is more demanding than in PPP.
“The teacher's role in TBLT requires greater expertise, and is more important, more demanding, and certainly more communicative than in PPP.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
At least a dozen empirical studies have demonstrated that elaborated spoken and written input achieves almost the same level of comprehensibility as simplified input, with redundancy compensating for higher linguistic burden.
“At least a dozen empirical studies have demonstrated that elaborated spoken and written input achieves almost the same level of comprehensibility as simplified input, with various forms of redundancy in the elaboration process compensating for the higher linguistic burden that elaborated materials present.(For a review of research findings, see Long, 2015, pp. 248-258).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Long, 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Attention (with or without conscious awareness) and repeated exposure to target items will need to suffice for gradual uptake.
“Attention (with or without conscious awareness) and repeated exposure to target items will need to suffice for gradual uptake (hence, input frequency effects).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
In TBLT, the teacher's role is more important than in PPP.
“The teacher's role in TBLT requires greater expertise, and is more important, more demanding, and certainly more communicative than in PPP.”
- Also stated in: § 5.3. In-Service Teacher Education for TBLT · plain
“Far from being downgraded, the teacher's role in TBLT is more important and requires more expertise than that of the teacher in focus on forms/PPP.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § 5.3. In-Service Teacher Education for TBLT · plain
- Premisereasoning
Task-based elaborated input retains authentic models of the use of lexical items and collocations typically absent in the text-based linguistically simplified input of commercial course books.
“One of several advantages of the task-based elaborated input employed in TBLT materials is precisely that it retains authentic models of the use of lexical items and collocations typically absent in the text-based linguistically simplified input of spoken and written materials in commercial course books.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Additional formative and summative evaluations of TBLT for children and adults have been published since, all favorable to a greater or lesser extent.
“Additional formative and summative evaluations of TBLT for children and adults have been published since, all favorable to a greater or lesser extent-for example, Gonzalez-Lloret & Nielson (2015; Spanish in the United States), Markee (2007; English as a second language [ESL] in the United States), Nielson (2015;distance EFL andESL), andShintani (2011, 2013; EFL for children in Japan).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Gonzalez-Lloret & Nielson (2015)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Markee (2007)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Shintani (2011, 2013)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
There is little empirical support for the idea that learners reinforce one another's incorrect L2 assumptions.
“Less than 1% led to non-target-like revisions of originally correct learner hypotheses, meaning that there was little empirical support for the idea that learners reinforce one another's incorrect L2 assumptions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Eckerth, 2008 source
- Premisecitation
In 22% of cases, neither learner possessed the relevant L2 knowledge at the outset, yet the collaborative dialogue led to learning gains after task completion.
“In 22% of cases, neither learner possessed the relevant L2 knowledge at the outset, yet the collaborative dialogue led to learning gains after task completion.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Eckerth, 2008 source
- Premisecitation
TBLT makes better use of available instructional time than the diet of PPP most critics advocate.
“Studies like those cited earlier on focus on form show that TBLT makes better use of it than the diet of PPP most critics advocate.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Some classroom studies and a statistical meta-analysis favor input-based approaches over output-based instruction.
“Some classroom studies, moreover (e.g., Shintani, 2011Shintani, , 2013)), have compared input-based and outputbased instruction; the results, together with those of a statistical meta-analysis of the same issues in teaching grammar in general (Shintani, Li, & Ellis, 2013), favor input-based approaches.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
In TBLT, the teacher's role is more communicative than in PPP.
“The teacher's role in TBLT requires greater expertise, and is more important, more demanding, and certainly more communicative than in PPP.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
Through MP1, MP2, MP6, MP7, and other MPs, attention to form and meaning are much better integrated in TBLT than in traditional LT.
“On the contrary, through MP1 (use task, not text, as the unit of analysis), MP2 (promote learning by doing), MP6 (focus on form), MP7 (provide implicit negative feedback), and other MPs, attention to form and meaning are much better integrated in TBLT than in traditional LT.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Implementing TBLT's focus on form and corrective feedback is harder than working through PPP drills and exercises one item at a time.
“This is harder (but also more intellectually stimulating and rewarding) than working through tedious drills and exercises one item at a time, knowing what the learners are supposed to say or write before they say or write it.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
In TBLT, implementing focus on form (MP6) and providing corrective feedback (MP7) often requires appropriate diagnosis and quick-thinking reaction to unforeseen learner errors or surprising task directions.
“MP6 (focus on form) and MP7 (provide corrective feedback), for example, can each often require an appropriate diagnosis and quick-thinking reaction, triggered by unforeseen learner errors or by the surprising direction in which learners sometimes take a task.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
In PPP, the teacher is relegated to implementing lessons planned by an unseen textbook writer and assumed appropriate for all students in a group on the same predetermined day.
“The PPP teacher is relegated to the job of implementing lessons planned down to the last drill and exercise by an unseen textbook writer and assumed appropriate for all students in a group on the same predetermined day.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
TBLT devotes most of its attention to equipping learners with the abilities they need, including familiarity with the new task-relevant language they need, to perform their target tasks successfully.
“It is true that TBLT devotes most of its attention to equipping learners with the abilities they need, including familiarity with the new task-relevant language they need, to perform their target tasks successfully.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
PPP, delivered following a one-size-fits-all commercial textbook, undermines the teacher's creativity and decision-making role.
“As Skehan (2002) pointed out in a response to an earlier flurry of charges from Bruton (2002a), it is Bruton's favored language-based, lockstep PPP, delivered following the dictates of a one-size-fits-all commercial textbook, which really undermines the teacher's creativity and decision-making role.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Skehan, 2002 source
- Interpretationreasoning
The idea that task-based interaction is restricted, and when ungrammatical, likely to remain so, is unfounded.
“The idea that task-based interaction is restricted, and when ungrammatical, likely to remain so, is unfounded-another nonissue.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
Some TBLT courses devote little or no time at all to output, depending on why students are learning the language.
“Depending on why students are learning the language concerned, some TBLT courses devote little or no time at all to output.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
In TBLT, attention to grammar is not carried out as a separate activity, as an end in itself (focus on forms), but during (and if necessary after, but not before) task work, as part of the methodology of TBLT.
“The difference is that attention to grammar (or phonology, lexis, collocations, pragmatics, etc.) is not carried out as a separate activity, as an end in itself (focus on forms), but during (and if necessary after, but not before) task work, as part of the methodology of TBLT.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
Students in TBLT courses learn as much grammar and vocabulary as students in PPP-type programs, even at the beginners level, when instruction is geared to learners' processing capacity.
“Students in TBLT courses learn as much grammar and vocabulary, even at the beginners level, with instruction geared to learners' processing capacity, and with the additional crucial advantage that course content is relevant to their communicative needs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisereasoning
The English for nebulous purposes (ENP) courses commercial publishers favor do not teach such things because they are not designed to cater to the communicative needs of particular learners or groups of learners.
“The English for nebulous purposes (ENP) michael h.long courses commercial publishers favor do not teach such things because they are not designed to cater to the communicative needs of particular learners or groups of learners.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Reports of the first 20 years of successful implementation of TBLT in over 200 state primary and secondary schools in Flanders appeared in 2006.
“Reports of the first 20 years of successful implementation of TBLT in over 200 state primary and secondary schools in Flanders appeared in 2006(Van den Branden, 2006a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Van den Branden, 2006a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationnone given
The scarcity of evaluations of TBLT is mostly due to the advent of TBLT having been relatively recent.
“The scarcity of evaluations is mostly due to the advent of TBLT having been relatively recent.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The literature on the diffusion of education has long identified large perceived differences between current performance and that required by new developments as a major factor mitigating against teacher buy-in and adoption of new ideas.
“This is potentially a problem, as the literature on the diffusion of education (see, e.g., Markee, 1993) has long identified large perceived differences between current performance and that required by new developments as a major factor mitigating against teacher buy-in and adoption of new ideas.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Markee, 1993
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Useful work on teachers' classroom performance and in-service education for TBLT has been carried out.
“Useful work on teachers' classroom performance and in-service education for TBLT has been carried out (e.g., East, 2012;Foster, 2009;Newton, 2015;Samuda, 2015;Van den Branden, 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites East, 2012
- cites Foster, 2009 source
- cites Newton, 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Work on transferability issues has begun, with valuable contributions from several researchers.
“Work on these issues has begun, with valuable contributions from, among others, Benson (2015); Brown, Hudson, Norris, and Bonk (2002); Nielson (2015); Nielson, Masters, Rhoades, and Freynik (2009); and Norris (2009), but the transferability of task-based abilities remains a real issue.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Benson (2015)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Brown, Hudson, Norris, and Bonk (2002)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Nielson (2015)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
The transferability of task-based abilities remains a real issue.
“Work on these issues has begun, with valuable contributions from, among others, Benson (2015); Brown, Hudson, Norris, and Bonk (2002); Nielson (2015); Nielson, Masters, Rhoades, and Freynik (2009); and Norris (2009), but the transferability of task-based abilities remains a real issue.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 35
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 29
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationNoticing can be facilitative, especially in speeding up learning of perceptually nonsalient features or in establishing a new representation in longterm memory, after which subsequent examples of the same feature in the input can be parsed implicitly, but it is neither a necessary component nor a necessary result of focus on form.
“Noticing can be facilitative, especially in speeding up learning of perceptually nonsalient features or in establishing a new representation in longterm memory, after which subsequent examples of the same feature in the input can be parsed implicitly (N.Ellis, 2005), but it is neither a necessary component nor a necessary result of focus on form.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites N. Ellis, 2005 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationNorris and Ortega (2000) published a statistical meta-analysis of 49 studies of explicit and implicit instruction and focus on forms vs focus on form.
“By 2000, five years before Swan's (2005) polemic first appeared, Norris and Ortega (2000) published a widely cited statistical meta-analysis of 49 studies of the relative effectiveness of explicit and implicit instruction and (a related but different issue) of focus on forms and focus on form.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Norris and Ortega, 2000 source
The text indexed under this DOI appears to be a different document: its sections are headed “Self-Monitoring and Self-Reflection in an English Blended Learning Environment.” Searches for Norris and Ortega, 49 studies, explicit versus implicit instruction, and focus on form found no passage addressing the claimed meta-analysis. This copy therefore cannot verify the attribution. (LLM, conf=0.79)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningBased on Bruton's miscellany of activities, skills, modalities, pedagogic procedures, language, conversational moves, and cognitive processes, it would be impossible to define task or task type or know what would and would not qualify as examples of either.
“Based on such a miscellany of activities, skills, modalities, pedagogic procedures, language, conversational moves, and cognitive processes, it would be impossible to define task or task type or know what would and would not qualify as examples of either.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
PremisereasoningTask and task-based language teaching (TBLT) mean different things to different people.
“Task and task-based language teaching (TBLT) mean different things to different people.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAll tasks in the third sense (structure-trapping tasks) are components in the delivery of a traditional linguistic syllabus and are part of task-supported LT.
“In other words, they are part of task-supported LT.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Skehan, 1998
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningNowhere did Doughty suggest that learning from other sources or by alternative means cannot occur, or occur over a longer period than 40 seconds.
“Nowhere did Doughty suggest that learning from other sources or by alternative means cannot occur, or occur over a longer period than 40 seconds.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Doughty, 2001 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationUnderstanding is facilitative, but not required for learning.
“Understanding is facilitative, but not required.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schmidt, 2010
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningStudents play a decisive role in the language-learning process; their readiness to learn is not determined by the day of the week or the page in a textbook.
“Students play a decisive role in the language-learning process; their readiness to learn is not determined by the day of the week or the page in a textbook.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationDoughty claimed no such thing as that acquisition only takes place online during communication; nor is such a belief part of the psycholinguistic rationale for TBLT.
“But Doughty claimed no such thing; nor is such a belief part of the psycholinguistic rationale for TBLT.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Doughty, 2001 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIncidentally and/or implicitly learned L2 knowledge is more durable and tends to increase over time.
“results to date suggest that incidentally and/or implicitly learned L2 knowledge is more durable and tends to increase over time”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Li, 2010
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningTarget tasks for different individuals or groups may differ greatly, which underscores the inadequacy of off-the-shelf commercial LT materials.
“Target tasks for two or more individuals or groups of learners may obviously differ greatly, which underscores the inadequacy of off-the-shelf commercial LT materials”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationProcessability determines learnability, and learnability determines teachability.
“In Pienemann's terms, processability determines learnability, and learnability determines teachability (Pienemann, 1984).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pienemann, 1984 source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe value of explicit knowledge for language learning was irrelevant for the issue Doughty was discussing and Swan's charge is therefore a nonissue both there and where TBLT is concerned.
“The value of explicit knowledge for language learning was irrelevant for the issue Doughty was discussing and Swan's charge is therefore a nonissue both there and where TBLT is concerned.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenIf TBLT is discredited, the conclusion that traditional linguistically focused approaches and PPP are justified by default is a non sequitur.
“If TBLT is discredited to an author's satisfaction, the conclusion drawn is often that traditional linguistically focused approaches and present-practice-produce (PPP) are justified by default-a non sequitur.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationDoughty discussed a window of perhaps 40 seconds following production during which selective attention might utilize online implicit negative feedback for form-function mapping.
“Doughty was discussing theory and research findings on working memory and short-term memory pertaining to the estimated period of perhaps 40 seconds following production during which speakers' (and by inference, L2 learners') selective attention span might be expected to be capable of utilizing online implicit negative feedback in the form of recasts for form-function mapping.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Doughty, 2001 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFocus on form works, and its gains in grammar and vocabulary are not statistically significantly smaller than those achieved by traditional focus on forms.
“Focus on form works, and the gains it produces in the learning of grammar and vocabulary are not statistically significantly smaller than those achieved by traditional focus on forms, which Swan favors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationExplicit procedures often do as well as, and sometimes slightly better than, incidental, online focus on form, but usually only with simple linguistic targets, only on immediate posttests, and only using discrete-point measures, and improvements achieved that way tend to deteriorate over time.
“Results show that explicit procedures often do as well as, and sometimes slightly better than, incidental, online focus on form, but as noted above, usually only with simple linguistic targets, only on immediate posttests, and only using discrete-point measures, and that improvements achieved that way tend to deteriorate over time (Doughty, 2003).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Doughty, 2003 source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningTask-based assessment can be problematic and involve choices among less desirable options.
“Task-based assessment can be problematic, however, and involve choices among less desirable options”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationDoughty (2001) provided a review of the psycholinguistic underpinnings of focus on form.
“Doughty (2001) provided a review of the psycholinguistic underpinnings of focus on form.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Doughty, 2001 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone givenThere is no assumption in TBLT that conscious awareness is required for acquisition.
“In fact, there is no assumption in TBLT that conscious awareness is required for acquisition”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationPPP and the skill-builders' view is that language acquisition is teacher-driven, whereas TBLT views language acquisition as learner-driven.
“As Skehan (2002, p. 294) noted, PPP and the skill-builders' view is that language acquisition is teacher-driven, whereas, with support from decades of SLA research, TBLT views language acquisition as learner-driven.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Skehan, 2002 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningWhat TBLT relies on is students' capacity for both incidental and intentional learning, and teachers and materials writers' use of both.
“What TBLT relies on is students' capacity for both incidental and intentional learning, and teachers and materials writers' use of both.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenMost lexical items and collocations are learned incidentally by adults, not just by children.
“even most skeptics recognize that most lexical items and collocations are learned that way-by adults, not just by children”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe methodological principles (MPs) are motivated by SLA research and by principles from the philosophy of education.
“The MPs are motivated by what second language acquisition (SLA) research has shown about how children and adults learn L2s successfully (Long, 2009(Long, , 2015, pp. 300-328) , pp. 300-328) and independently, by principles from the philosophy of education (Long, 2015, pp. 63-83).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Long, 2009 source
- cites Long, 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenOperationalizing and demonstrating incidental (and implicit) language learning under laboratory conditions is notoriously difficult, and harder still in the wild.
“Operationalizing and demonstrating incidental (and implicit) language learning under laboratory conditions is notoriously difficult, and harder still in the wild.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe gains from focus on form are achieved without the side effects of focus on forms, including irrelevance to student needs, accidental developmental appropriateness, exposure to non-native-like L2 models, little communicative practice, and monotony.
“The gains are achieved, moreover, without the latter's side effects: among other problems, irrelevance to student needs, at best only accidental developmental appropriateness, exposure to non-native-like L2 models, little opportunity for michael h.long communicative practice, and in all too many classrooms, mind-numbing monotony.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe noticing hypothesis holds that learning requires attention and awareness, but not intention or understanding.
“The noticing hypothesis holds that learning requires attention and awareness, but not intention or understanding.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schmidt, 2010
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningLearners traverse developmental sequences, often producing utterances reflecting learner-created, non-target-like rules.
“Instead, with occasional L1 influence on the duration of stages and/or the addition of substages, learners traverse developmental sequences, often producing utterances reflecting learner-created, non-target-like rules in the process.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningLinguistic items are dealt with in TBLT, and dealt with in a more scientifically defensible manner than by the traditional synthetic syllabus.
“In sum, linguistic items are dealt with, and dealt with in a more scientifically defensible manner than by the traditional synthetic syllabus.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningThere is no polarization of meaning-based and form-based instruction in the rationale for TBLT or in its implementation, and no exclusion of either form or meaning.
“There is no such polarization in the rationale for TBLT or in its implementation, and no exclusion of either form or meaning.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMuch good work has been published on task complexity and on task syllabus design.
“Much good work has been published on task complexity and on task syllabus design (see, e.g., Gilabert, Barón, & Levkina, 2011;Révész, Michel, & Gilabert, 2015;Robinson, 2009Robinson, , 2011;;Skehan, 2014), and more is under way.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenAssessment of task-based abilities always involves use of task-based, criterion-referenced performance tests.
“Views differ on the best way(s) to assess task-based abilities, although the process always involves use of task-based, criterion-referenced performance tests.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenTBLT courses have the additional crucial advantage that course content is relevant to learners' communicative needs.
“Students in TBLT courses learn as much grammar and vocabulary, even at the beginners level, with instruction geared to learners' processing capacity, and with the additional crucial advantage that course content is relevant to their communicative needs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenMost problems are dealt with reactively, usually by the teacher, but also by other students, and, if pedagogic tasks are designed cleverly enough, by corrective feedback loops in the tasks themselves.
“Most problems are dealt with reactively, usually by the teacher, but also by other students, and, if pedagogic tasks are designed cleverly enough, by corrective feedback loops in the tasks themselves.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenAlmost all sequences of pedagogic tasks with which the author is familiar begin with input-based tasks, and many end there.
“Almost all sequences of pedagogic tasks with which I in defense of tasks and tblt 21 am familiar begin with input-based tasks, and many end there.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationUntrained teachers with poor command of the L2 can implement PPP but cannot implement TBLT.
“Untrained teachers with poor command of the L2 can do PPP; they cannot do TBLT.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe overall yield of task complexity research has been disappointing, largely due to noncomparability of conflicting findings, mostly because researchers used a wide variety of tasks, task types, moderator variables, and outcome measures.
“The overall yield has been disappointing, however, largely due to the noncomparability of what are sometimes conflicting findings, mostly the result of researchers having used a wide variety of tasks, task types, moderator variables, and outcome measures (Sasayama, Malicka, & Norris, 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sasayama, Malicka, & Norris, 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenTBLT devotes far more attention to lexis and to collocations-and to relevant lexis and collocations-than do the majority of commercial textbooks.
“TBLT devotes far more attention to lexis and to collocations-and to relevant lexis and collocations, moreover-than do the majority of commercial textbooks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningSwan's charge that evidence is lacking of successful long-term classroom implementation of TBLT had some merit in 2005, less so in 2011 and today in 2016.
“Of the many charges Swan leveled, this one (2005, p. 379) had some merit in 2005, when his original article was published, although less so when it was reprinted in 2011 and today in 2016.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Swan, 2005 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenWhen unambiguous behavioral variables exist to indicate success or failure at task completion, assessment is fairly straightforward.
“Things are fairly straightforward as long as unambiguous behavioral variables exist to indicate success or failure at task michael h.long completion.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenMost word frequency lists are based on corpora unconnected to the discourse domains relevant for particular groups or types of learners, especially advanced learners.
“Unfortunately, most word frequency lists are based on corpora unconnected to the discourse domains relevant for particular groups or types of learners, especially advanced learners.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenWhile many criticisms of tasks and TBLT are unwarranted, TBLT is not a panacea; several problems remain.
“While many criticisms of tasks and TBLT are unwarranted-nonissues-this is emphatically not to say that TBLT is a panacea.Several problems remain-real issues.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningSo-called unfocused pedagogic tasks in genuine TBLT are not designed to teach particular grammatical structures, but that does not mean that grammar is not taught.
“It is true that so-called unfocused pedagogic tasks in genuine TBLT are not designed to teach particular grammatical structures, but that certainly does not mean that grammar (or any other linguistic subsystem) is not taught.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn 38% of cases, non-target-like hypotheses were replaced by L2-conforming representations and integrated into the learners' interlanguage grammars, with the majority of such changes traceable to learning opportunities arising from task-based interactions.
“in 38% of cases, non-target-like hypotheses were replaced by L2-conforming representations and integrated into the learners' interlanguage grammars, as reflected in the medium-term posttest, with the majority of such changes traceable to learning opportunities arising from the task-based interactions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Eckerth, 2008 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenA lot of grammar is learned from positive evidence, that is, from repeated exposure to instances of target grammatical features and their authentic uses encountered primarily in task-based materials.
“A lot of grammar is learned from positive evidence, that is, from repeated exposure to instances of target grammatical features and their authentic uses encountered primarily in task-based materials.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenAdvanced learners have usually mastered most of the grammar they need, but typically still lack the vocabulary and collocations required to operate effectively in the specialized discourse domains that usually motivated their need for advanced L2 abilities.
“Advanced learners, especially, have usually mastered most of the grammar they need, but typically still lack the vocabulary and collocations required to operate effectively in the specialized discourse domains (academic, occupational, vocational, etc.) that usually motivated their need for advanced L2 abilities in the first place.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenTBLT adoption requires expertise on the part of course designers and classroom teachers, and a considerable investment of time and effort if it is to be successful.
“TBLT is still a relatively recent innovation-one whose adoption requires expertise on the part of course designers and classroom teachers, and a considerable investment of time and effort if it is to be successful.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: TBLT is still a relatively recent innovation.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningPrograms for refugees and migrant workers would be very well served by TBLT, but often lack adequate staffing, funding, and other resources, and so require the assistance of volunteers.
“Programs for refugees and migrant workers would be very well served by TBLT, too, but often lack adequate staffing, funding, and other resources, and so require the assistance of volunteers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenMany criticisms of TBLT lack merit, but some raise important matters.
“Many criticisms of TBLT lack merit, but some raise important matters.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe Belgian experience has highlighted the importance of adequate in-service (re-)training and continued teacher support.
“The Belgian experience, in particular (see Van den Branden, 2006b), has highlighted the importance of adequate in-service (re-)training and continued teacher support.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Van den Branden, 2006b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningReal issues remain for TBLT.
“Real issues remain.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningTBLT success will be more likely in programs housed in institutions with a stable, qualified, and experienced teaching staff and a relatively stable student population, located in societies where language learning is a serious matter and recognized and supported as such.
“Success will be more likely in programs housed in institutions with a stable, qualified, and experienced teaching staff and a relatively stable student population (thereby making an NA and materials development worth the effort), located in societies where language learning is a serious matter and recognized and supported as such.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Washback from grammar-based final exams in many foreign language programs for high school students, especially centralized state-controlled systems, exerts a huge influence on what is taught and how.
“In my view, a more serious problem (for any communicative LT, not just TBLT) in many foreign language programs for high school students, especially those that form part of centralized, state-controlled education systems, is washback from what is often a grammar-based final exam that both teachers and students know lies in wait at the end of the year.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In some countries, the state-mandated final exam lacks validity for language assessment.
“In some countries, the exam looks more like an IQ test and lacks validity for language assessment, but it can have serious implications for university entrance, so tends to exert a huge influence on what is taught and how.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Over 300 studies on task complexity have been published in journal articles to date.
“The research effort has been intense, with over 300 studies to date in journal articles alone.”
The paper relies on this without support.
TBLT brings increased student motivation, as reported by teachers.
“This can be offset by the increased student motivation teachers report that TBLT brings, but it is a real issue, nonetheless.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Increasing numbers of school systems, universities, and government language programs in many countries meet the requirements for TBLT success.
“Increasing numbers of school systems, universities, and government language programs in many countries meet those requirements.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Inadequate instructional time and lack of L2 exposure outside the classroom are real problems for all kinds of language teaching, not just TBLT and not just in foreign language settings.
“Inadequate instructional time and lack of L2 exposure outside the classroom are real problems for all kinds of LT, not just TBLT, and not just in foreign language settings.”
The paper relies on this without support.
TBLT is still a relatively recent innovation.
“TBLT is still a relatively recent innovation-one whose adoption requires expertise on the part of course designers and classroom teachers, and a considerable investment of time and effort if it is to be successful.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Long questioned whether metalinguistic knowledge gained at one time can be used by the learner at another time, as Swan claimed.
“but he also questioned whether metalinguistic knowledge acquired at one time can be used by the learner at another timeas Swan claimed can happen.”
From Position paper: Moving task-based language teaching forward (2017) · cites this paper as Long (2016)
In §2.3, Long says it would be “patently absurd” to suppose that metalinguistic knowledge provided at Time 1 could never be used at Time 2. He questions the long-term benefit in Swan’s example and says such knowledge is usually of limited value, but does not question whether later use is possible. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredMany objections raised by Sheen and Swan against TBLT are invalid because they misunderstand TBLT and ignore relevant research.
“However, many of the points raised by Sheen and Swan are invalid, displaying a misunderstanding of what TBLT is and an ignorance of the relevant research -see Ellis (2009) and Long (2016) for refutations of their objections.”
From Towards a modular language curriculum for using tasks (2019) · cites this paper as Long (2016)
In sections 2.1 and 3.5 (pages unavailable), Long argues that Swan discounts empirical research and mischaracterizes TBLT, calling one objection a straw man. These passages support the claim about Swan, but the passages found do not address Sheen's objections, so Long alone does not support that part of the attribution. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe critiques directed at TBLT rest on misunderstandings, concern non-issues, and have already been adequately answered in prior work.
“The critiques levelled at TBLT are based on “misunderstandings” about TBLT and concern “non-issues” and have already been adequately addressed (see Ellis, 2009;Long, 2016).”
From Position paper: Moving task-based language teaching forward (2017) · cites this paper as Long, 2016
The Abstract says most of the 14 criticisms are nonissues, and section 3.1 calls one criticism a misunderstanding. But the Abstract and Conclusion also acknowledge that some criticisms raise important matters, and the passages do not establish that the critiques had already been adequately answered in prior work. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredLong (2016) produced his own list of real issues, covering only items 3, 9 and 10 of the author's Table 1, based on his particular conception of TBLT.
“Long (2016), in an issue of the Annual Review of Applied Linguistics devoted to TBLT, produced his own list of 'real issues' (only #3, 9 and 10 in Table 1) based on his particular view of what constitutes TBLT .”
From Position paper: Moving task-based language teaching forward (2017) · cites this paper as Long (2016)
Section 5, “Tasks and TBLT: Some Real Issues,” says Long will mention three real issues, and the paper defines the conception of TBLT he uses. Our copy cannot establish whether those issues correspond only to items 3, 9 and 10 of the citing author's Table 1. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredLong stressed that focus on form must be reactive.
“What Long emphasized is that focus on form must be reactive.”
From Position paper: Moving task-based language teaching forward (2017) · cites this paper as Long (2016)
Section 2.1 describes focus on form in TBLT as reactive and often triggered by task work. But it does not say it must always be reactive; section 2.5 also allows teachers or task designers to deliberately direct attention to language during meaning-focused use. The claim turns a description into an absolute requirement. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Long (2016) stated that acquisition does not occur only online during communication.
“Long (2016) pointed out that that this is not the case”
From Position paper: Moving task-based language teaching forward (2017) · cites this paper as Long (2016)
Much of the rationale for tasks is based on the interaction approach.
“but much of the rationale for tasks is based on the interaction approach (Bygate, Skehan & Swain 2001;Ellis 2003;Long 2016;Ellis 2017b;Kim 2017).”
From Interaction and instructed second language acquisition (2018) · cites this paper as Long 2016
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Ellis quotation cites a page outside its listed range
MinorThe text attributes a quotation to page 160 of Ellis (1997), but the corresponding reference lists that work on pages 221-246.
“(R. Ellis, 1997, p. 160)”
“25. Ellis, R. (1997). Task-based language teaching: sorting out the misunderstandings. International Jour- nal of Applied Linguistics, 19(3), 221-246.”
The same Ellis article has two publication years
MinorThe reference list gives the same article, journal volume, issue, and page range under both 1997 and 2009. Those entries cannot both have the correct publication year.
“25. Ellis, R. (1997). Task-based language teaching: sorting out the misunderstandings. International Jour- nal of Applied Linguistics, 19(3), 221-246.”
“27. Ellis, R. (2009). Task-based language teaching: Sorting out the misunderstandings. International Jour- nal of Applied Linguistics, 19(3), 221-246.”
Cites
The Role of the Linguistic Environment in Second Language Acquisition
Long, M. H. (1996) · Handbook of Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1016/b978-012589042-7/50015-3 · Cited by 3,927 · see citing works
Self-citationTask-based Language Learning and Teaching
Ellis, R. (2003) · Asian Journal of English Language Teaching · doi:10.65961/ajelt-2003-1-009 · Cited by 3,601 · see citing works
A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning
Garcia, P., & Skehan, P. (1999) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587891 · Cited by 3,489 · see citing works
TASK-BASED LANGUAGE LEARNING AND TEACHING
Mackey, A. (2004) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263104293056 · Cited by 2,838 · see citing works
THE SIGNIFICANCE OF LEARNER'S ERRORS
Corder, S. P. (1967) · IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching · doi:10.1515/iral.1967.5.1-4.161 · Cited by 2,702 · see citing works
(1998) · Cited by 2,572 · see citing works
Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/0023-8333.00136 · Cited by 2,414 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Many of the 80-plus studies included in two aforementioned statistical meta-analyses (Goo et al., 2015; Norris & Ortega, 2000), for example, involved new language for the learners concerned.”
Input in Second Language Acquisition
Bottigheimer, R. B., Gass, S. M., & Madden, C. G. (1986) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/327330 · Cited by 2,336 · see citing works
Cognition and Second Language Instruction
Robinson, P. J. (2001) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139524780 · Cited by 1,753 · see citing works
How Large a Vocabulary is Needed For Reading and Listening?
Nation, I. (2006) · The Canadian Modern Language Review · doi:10.3138/cmlr.63.1.59 · Cited by 1,436 · see citing works
Theories in Second Language Acquisition: An Introduction
McDonough, K. (2008) · Language and Education · doi:10.2167/le128.0 · Cited by 1,267 · see citing works
(2014) · Cited by 1,210 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition
Kuiken, F., Vedder, I., Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203808184 · Cited by 1,124 · see citing works
Task‐based language teaching: sorting out the misunderstandings
Ellis, R. (2009) · International Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1111/j.1473-4192.2009.00231.x · Cited by 1,031 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Klapper’s (2003) proposal, like that of R. Ellis (1994, 2003, 2009), is for a hybrid model, one that may yet turn out to be correct but that some would see as fatally flawed because it seeks to meld two oppositional psycholinguistic positions.”
The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis
Li, S. (2010) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00561.x · Cited by 941 · cited 9× · see citing works
“…and short-term effect of explicit feedback was greater, the longer-term effect size for recasts (a prime example of “incidental, on-linefocusonform”)wasslightlylargerthantheshort-termeffect,moreeffective thanexplicitfeedbackondelayedposttests,andmoreenduring,evenincreasing overtime(Li,2010,p.343).”
InfluentialGroup Work, Interlanguage Talk, and Second Language Acquisition
Long, M. H., & Porter, P. A. (1985) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586827 · Cited by 901 · see citing works
Self-citationAT THE INTERFACE: DYNAMIC INTERACTIONS OF EXPLICIT AND IMPLICIT LANGUAGE KNOWLEDGE
Ellis, N. C. (2005) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s027226310505014x · Cited by 893 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…even most skeptics recognize that most lexical items and collocations are learned that way—by adults, not just by children—and some scholars (e.g., N. Ellis, 2005; Ellis & Wulff, 2015; Rastelli, 2014) maintain that implicit, statistical, usage-based learning underlies most grammatical learning as…”
Three Approaches to Task-Based Syllabus Design
Long, M. H., & Crookes, G. (1992) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587368 · Cited by 866 · see citing works
Self-citationDefining Issues in English Language Teaching
Widdowson, H. G. (2003) · Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa) · Cited by 837 · see citing works
INPUT, INTERACTION, AND SECOND LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT: An Empirical Study of Question Formation in ESL
Mackey, A. (1999) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263199004027 · Cited by 772 · see citing works
Thomas, M. (1999) · Language · doi:10.2307/417479 · Cited by 757 · see citing works
Theories in Second Language Acquisition
(2014) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203628942 · Cited by 747 · see citing works
Thomas, M. (1997) · Language · doi:10.2307/416043 · Cited by 717 · see citing works
Second Language Needs Analysis
Long, M. H. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511667299 · Cited by 646 · see citing works
Self-citationImplicit and Explicit Learning of Languages
VanPatten, B., & Rothman, J. (2015) · Studies in bilingualism · doi:10.1075/sibil.48 · Cited by 609 · see citing works
Psychological Constraints on the Teachability of Languages
Pienemann, M. (1984) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263100005015 · Cited by 584 · see citing works
The Companion to Language Assessment
Jenkins, J., & Leung, C. (2013) · doi:10.1002/9781118411360 · Cited by 566 · see citing works
Communicative Tasks and the Language Curriculum
Nunan, D. (1991) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587464 · Cited by 560 · see citing works
Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form
Doughty, C. (2001) · Cognition and Second Language Instruction · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139524780.010 · Cited by 523 · see citing works
Instructed SLA: Constraints, Compensation, and Enhancement
Doughty, C. J. (2003) · The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1002/9780470756492.ch10 · Cited by 519 · see citing works
The Structural Syllabus and Second Language Acquisition
Ellis, R. (1993) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586953 · Cited by 482 · see citing works
Legislation by Hypothesis: The Case of Task-Based Instruction
Swan, M. (2005) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/ami013 · Cited by 481 · see citing works
(2006) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511667282 · Cited by 409 · see citing works
Cross-Linguistic Aspects of Processability Theory
Pienemann, M. (2005) · Studies in bilingualism · doi:10.1075/sibil.30 · Cited by 397 · see citing works
(2006) · Cited by 383 · see citing works
Classroom Oriented Research in Second Language Acquisition
van Lier, L. A. W., Seliger, H. W., & Long, M. H. (1985) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586835 · Cited by 379 · see citing works
Self-citationManaging Curricular Innovation
Markee, N. P. (1996) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 377 · see citing works
Classroom oriented research in second language acquisition
Karpf, A. (1985) · System · doi:10.1016/0346-251x(85)90048-x · Cited by 374 · see citing works
Conversational interaction in second language acquisition
Mackey, A. (2017) · Cited by 355 · see citing works
9. PEER-PEER DIALOGUE AS A MEANS OF SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNING
Swain, M., Brooks, L., & Tocalli-Beller, A. (2002) · Annual Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0267190502000090 · Cited by 340 · see citing works
The Handbook of Language Teaching
(2009) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781444315783 · Cited by 335 · see citing works
Noticing in second language acquisition: a critical review
Truscott, J. (1998) · Second language Research · doi:10.1191/026765898674803209 · Cited by 331 · see citing works
The Significance of Learners' Errors
Richards, J. C. (2015) · doi:10.4324/9781315836003-8 · Cited by 330 · see citing works
Problems in Second Language Acquisition
Long, M. H. (2017) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315089447 · Cited by 323 · see citing works
Self-citationSecond Language Task Complexity
(2011) · Task-based language teaching · doi:10.1075/tblt.2 · Cited by 321 · see citing works
Communicative language teaching: Making it work
Nunan, D. (1987) · ELT Journal · doi:10.1093/elt/41.2.136 · Cited by 316 · see citing works
Processing Perspectives on Task Performance
(2014) · Task-based language teaching · doi:10.1075/tblt.5 · Cited by 312 · see citing works
Pica, T., Lincoln-Porter, F., Paninos, D., & Linnell, J. (1996) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587607 · Cited by 302 · see citing works
Task‐Based Teaching and Testing
Norris, J. M. (2009) · doi:10.1002/9781444315783.ch30 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
The Effects of Simplified and Elaborated Texts on Foreign Language Reading Comprehension
Yano, Y., Long, M. H., & Ross, S. J. (1994) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1994.tb01100.x · Cited by 279 · see citing works
Self-citationTHE CASE AGAINST THE CASE AGAINST RECASTS
Goo, J., & Mackey, A. (2013) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263112000708 · Cited by 271 · see citing works
Experimental and Intervention Studies on Formulaic Sequences in a Second Language
Boers, F., & Lindstromberg, S. (2012) · Annual Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0267190512000050 · Cited by 271 · see citing works
The Persistence of the Recitation
Hoetker, J., & Ahlbrand, W. P. (1969) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312006002145 · Cited by 261 · see citing works
Task-Based Language Teaching from the Teachers' Perspective
East, M. (2011) · Task-based language teaching · doi:10.1075/tblt.3 · Cited by 252 · see citing works
Robinson, P. (2011) · Task-Based Language Teaching · doi:10.1075/tblt.2.05ch1 · Cited by 251 · see citing works
The Contrast Theory of negative input
Saxton, M. A. (1997) · Journal of Child Language · doi:10.1017/s030500099600298x · Cited by 239 · see citing works
Implicit and explicit instruction in L2 learning: Norris & Ortega (2000) revisited and updated
Goo, J., Granena, G., Yilmaz, Y., & Novella, M. (2015) · Studies in Bilingualism · doi:10.1075/sibil.48.18goo · Cited by 224 · see citing works
Seedhouse, P. (1999) · ELT Journal · doi:10.1093/elt/53.3.149 · Cited by 210 · see citing works
Two Types of Input Modification and EFL Reading Comprehension: Simplification versus Elaboration
Oh, S.-Y. (2001) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587860 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Seedhouse, P. (2005) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00314.x · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Needs analysis for specialized learner populations: Essential methodological improvements
Serafini, E. J., Lake, J. B., & Long, M. H. (2015) · English for Specific Purposes · doi:10.1016/j.esp.2015.05.002 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Self-citationEllis, R. (1989) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263100008159 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Révész, A., Michel, M., & Gilabert, R. (2016) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263115000339 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
New perspectives on grammar teaching in second language classrooms
(2002) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.39-4109 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
New Perspectives on Grammar Teaching in Second Language Classrooms
Gao, C. Z., Hinkel, E., & Fotos, S. S. (2002) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3588337 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Usage-based approaches to SLA.
Ellis, N. C., & Wulff, S. (2014) · Deep Blue (University of Michigan) · doi:10.4324/9780203628942-10 · Cited by 163
Significance of learners' errors
Coder, S. P. (1967) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 159 · see citing works
The Hidden Curriculum of Survival ESL
Auerbach, E. R., & Burgess, D. (1985) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586274 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Domains and Directions in the Development of TBLT
(2015) · Task-based language teaching · doi:10.1075/tblt.8 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Evaluating TBLT: The case of a task-based Spanish program
González‐Lloret, M., & Nielson, K. B. (2014) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168814541745 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Shintani, N. (2013) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.1002/tesq.54 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Taking communication to task? A critical review of recent trends in language teaching
Klapper, J. (2003) · Language Learning Journal · doi:10.1080/09571730385200061 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Examinee abilities and task difficulty in task-based second language performance assessment
Norris, J. M., Brown, J. D., Hudson, T. D., & Bonk, W. J. (2002) · Language Testing · doi:10.1191/0265532202lt237oa · Cited by 141 · see citing works
den Branden, K. V. (2009) · International Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1111/j.1473-4192.2009.00241.x · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Tasks, design, and the architecture of pedagogical spaces
Samuda, V. (2015) · Task-based language teaching · doi:10.1075/tblt.8.10sam · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Kim, Y. (2006) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/40264526 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Shintani, N., Li, S., & Ellis, R. (2013) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12001 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
The Diffusion of Innovation in Language Teaching
Markee, N. (1992) · Annual Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0267190500002488 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
From tasking purposes to purposing tasks
Bruton, A. (2002) · ELT Journal · doi:10.1093/elt/56.3.280 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Task-based language teaching: An empirical study of task transfer
Benson, S. D. (2016) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168815569829 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Skehan, P. (2002) · ELT Journal · doi:10.1093/elt/56.3.289 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Klapper, J., & Rees, J. (2003) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1191/1362168803lr128oa · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Shintani, N. (2011) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168810388692 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Training teachers: Task-based as well?
den Branden, K. V. (2006) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511667282.011 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Håkansson, G., & Norrby, C. (2010) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00569.x · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Authentic Discourse and the Survival English Curriculum
Cathcart, R. L. (1989) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587510 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
An investigation of second language task-based performance assessments
Brown, J. D. (2002) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 83 · see citing works
(2012) · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Task-based language teaching: For the state secondary FL classroom?
Bruton, A. (2005) · Language Learning Journal · doi:10.1080/09571730585200091 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Methodological Principles for Language Teaching
Long, M. H. (2009) · The Handbook of Language Teaching · doi:10.1002/9781444315783.ch21 · Cited by 76
Self-citationSequences and Processes in Language Learning
Ortega, L. (2009) · The Handbook of Language Teaching · doi:10.1002/9781444315783.ch6 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Robinson, P. (2009) · The Handbook of Language Teaching · doi:10.1002/9781444315783.ch17 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Discontinuity in Second Language Acquisition
Rastelli, S. (2014) · Multilingual Matters eBooks · doi:10.21832/9781783092475 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Theories in second language acquisition
Larsen‐Freeman, D., & Long, M. H. (2014) · doi:10.4324/9781315835891-14 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Self-citationExploring Regularities and Dynamic Systems in L2 Development
Lenzing, A. (2015) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12092 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Investigating consciousness‐raising tasks: pedagogically targeted and non‐targeted learning gains
Eckerth, J. (2008) · International Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1111/j.1473-4192.2008.00188.x · Cited by 53 · see citing works
From number agreement to the subjunctive: Evidence for Processability Theory in L2 Spanish
Bonilla, C. L. (2015) · Second Language Research · doi:10.1177/0267658314537291 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
A Task-Based Language Teaching Approach to the Police Traffic Stop
O’Connell, S. P. (2015) · TESL Canada Journal · doi:10.18806/tesl.v31i0.1189 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
When and how the language development in TBI?
(2002) · doi:10.1093/elt/56.3.296 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Task‐based language learning research: expecting too much or too little?
Foster, P. (2009) · International Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1111/j.1473-4192.2009.00242.x · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Bartlett, N. J. D. (2005) · Second Language Needs Analysis · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511667299.011 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Waiting for Godot in the EFL classroom
Dinsmore, D. (1985) · ELT Journal · doi:10.1093/elt/39.4.225 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Task‐Based Language Assessment
Gorp, K. V., & Deygers, B. (2013) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118411360.wbcla058 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Chapter 5. Manipulating task complexity across task types and modes
Gilabert, R., Barón Parés, J., & Levkina, M. (2011) · Task-Based Language Teaching · doi:10.1075/tblt.2.10ch5 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Thinking about Language Teaching: Selected Articles 1982-2011
(2013) · doi:10.1093/elt/cct002 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Language syllabuses : state of the art
Tickoo, M. L. (1987) · SEAMEO Regional Language Centre eBooks · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Rastelli, S. (2014) · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Thinking about Language Teaching: Selected Articles 1982-2011
Swan, M. K. (2013) · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Willis, D. (1993) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587406 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
The Persistence of the Recitation
Hoetker, J., & Ahlbrand, W. P. (1969) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.2307/1161891
Pienemann, M., & Keßler, J.-U. (n.d.) · The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.4324/9780203808184.ch14
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Sasayama S. , Malicka A. , & Norris J. M. (2015, September 16–18). Primary challenges in cognitive task complexity research: Results of a comprehensive research synthesis. Paper presented at the colloquium, An International Collaborative Research Network (CRN) on Task Complexity, at the Sixth International Conference on Task-Based Language Teaching (TBLT), Katolieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium.
- Long, 1996, Handbook of second language acquisition, 413
- Newton J. (2015, November 30). Teachers, tasks and textbooks. Plenary address, AALA conference, Adelaide, Australia.
- Schmidt, 2010, Proceedings of CLaSIC 2010, 721
- Long, 2007, Problems in SLA, 139
- 10.1111/j.1473-4192.2009.00231.x · DOI · Paper page
- Johnston, 1985, Syntactic and morphological progressions in learner English
- Johnston, 1997, Development and variation in learner language (Unpublished doctoral dissertation)
- Nielson, 2009, Prototype implementation of an online Chinese course: An analysis of course implementation and learner performance
- Long, 1985, Modeling and assessing second language development, 77
- Wilkins, 1994, Language, language acquisition and syllabus design: Some recent issues, English Teaching (Korea), 49, 41
- Nielson K. (2015, September 16–18). Evaluating the impact of online practice on real-world task performance of second language learners. Paper presented at the Sixth International Conference on Task-Based Language Teaching, Katolieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Interaction and instructed second language acquisition
Loewen, S., & Sato, M. (2018) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444818000125 · Cited by 377 · see citing works
“Baralt, Gilabert & Robinson 2014; Skehan 2014; Long 2015; Gilabert, Manchón & Vasylets 2016; Plonsky & Kim 2016; Ziegler 2016a), but much of the rationale for tasks is based on the interaction approach (Bygate, Skehan & Swain 2001; Ellis 2003; Long 2016; Ellis 2017b; Kim 2017).”
BackgroundTask-Based Language Teaching: Theory and Practice
Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C. (2019) · doi:10.1017/9781108643689 · Cited by 407 · see citing works
Task-based language teaching theory and practice
Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C. (2020) · Cited by 284 · see citing works
Position paper: Moving task-based language teaching forward
Ellis, R. (2017) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444817000179 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
“The critiques levelled at TBLT are based on ‘misunderstandings’ about TBLT and concern ‘non-issues’ and have already been adequately addressed (see Ellis 2009; Long 2016).”
BackgroundInfluentialTBLT implementation and evaluation: A meta-analysis
Bryfonski, L., & McKay, T. (2017) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168817744389 · Cited by 277 · see citing works
“Additional published work was found using backward citations of prominent books and review articles (e.g. Long, 2015) as well as literature reviews and syntheses on the topic of TBLT implementation (e.g. Long, 2016) and previous implementation studies (e.g. McDonough & Chaikitmongkol, 2007).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialTowards a modular language curriculum for using tasks
Ellis, R. (2019) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168818765315 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
“Long (2016) also acknowledged that there may be problems in teachers’ implementing TBLT but argued that this can be addressed through training programmes and cited the Belgian experience reported in Van den Branden (2006).”
BackgroundAlexopoulou, T., Michel, M. C., Murakami, A., & Meurers, D. (2017) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12232 · Cited by 179 · see citing works
“…2013; Robinson, 2011), to date no overarching outcomes can be presented because the different studies have used a plethora of task complexity manipulations and an even larger number of complexity and accuracy measures hindering comparisons (Long, 2016; Jackson and Suethanapornkul, 2013).”
BackgroundThe Cambridge Handbook of Task-Based Language Teaching
Nuzzo, E., & Velásquez, D. C. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868327 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Effects of Task Complexity and Planning Conditions on L2 Argumentative Writing Production
Rahimi, M., & Zhang, L. J. (2017) · Discourse Processes · doi:10.1080/0163853x.2017.1336042 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
“One of the important unresolved issues is task complexity criteria (Ellis, 2013; Long, 2016).”
BackgroundWe need to talk about coursebooks
Jordan, G., & Gray, H. (2019) · ELT Journal · doi:10.1093/elt/ccz038 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Kim, Y., Jung, Y., & Tracy–Ventura, N. (2017) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.1002/tesq.381 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Foundational Principles ofTask-Based Language Teaching
East, M. (2021) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003039709 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
‘Tasks’ appearing in primary school textbooks
Butler, Y. G., Kang, K. I., Kim, H., & Liu, Y. (2017) · ELT Journal · doi:10.1093/elt/ccx056 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Ecological systems theory and second language research
Chong, S. W., Isaacs, T., & McKinley, J. (2022) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444822000283 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Task-Based Learning in Task-Based Teaching: Training Teachers of Chinese as a Foreign Language
Han, Z. (2018) · Annual Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s026719051800003x · Cited by 89 · see citing works
“However, there is a glaring shortfall in the TBLT literature to date: Writings on teacher training have remained scant (Brandl, 2016; Ellis, 2017; Long, 2016; Van den Branden, 2016).”
BackgroundEffects of increasing the degree of reasoning and the number of elements on L2 argumentative writing
Rahimi, M. (2019) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168818761465 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
“One of the main issues is developing criteria for task difficulty and sequencing (Ellis, 2013; Long, 2016).”
BackgroundBryfonski, L. (2021) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/13621688211026570 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
“As Long (2016) points out, TBLT is ‘harder . . . than working through tedious drills and exercises one item at a time, knowing what the learners are supposed to say or write before they say or write it’ (p. 25).”
BackgroundInfluentialLi, S., Ellis, R., & Zhu, Y. (2019) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716418000796 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
“Working memory is also assumed to be important for noticing linguistic input in the currently popular cognitive–interactionist approach to language learning (Long, 2016).”
BackgroundTechnology-mediated task-based language teaching: A research agenda
SMITH, B. K., & González‐Lloret, M. (2020) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444820000233 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
“In the TBLT literature, tasks have been conceptualized on a continuum from communicative activities that can accompany more traditional form-focused approaches (Ellis, 2009) to more authentic everyday life activities that reflect real-world activities and interactions (Long, 1985, 2016).”
BackgroundOptions in a task-based language-teaching curriculum
Ellis, R. (2021) · TASK Journal on Task-Based Language Teaching and Learning · doi:10.1075/task.00002.ell · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Long, M. H., Lee, J.-Y., & Hillman, K. K. (2019) · The Cambridge Handbook of Language Learning · doi:10.1017/9781108333603.022 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citationRiestenberg, K., & Sherris, A. (2018) · Canadian Modern Language Review/ La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes · doi:10.3138/cmlr.4051 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Task-based language teaching for beginner-level young learners
Ellis, R. (2020) · Language Teaching for Young Learners · doi:10.1075/ltyl.19005.ell · Cited by 67 · see citing works
TASK-BASED PRONUNCIATION TEACHING AND RESEARCH
Mora, J. C., & Levkina, M. (2017) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263117000183 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
“…approach where focus on form (FonF) is not artificially imposed but rather driven by the context the task is placed in. Tasks are defined as real-world communicative activities “to which learners will put the L2 beyond the classroom—the things they will do in and through the L2” (Long, 2016).”
BackgroundThe impact of teaching approach on growth in L2 proficiency and self-efficacy
Harris, J., & Leeming, P. (2021) · Journal of Second Language Studies · doi:10.1075/jsls.20014.har · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Effects of task complexity and working memory capacity on L2 reading comprehension
Jung, J. (2018) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2018.02.005 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Interaction, Feedback and Task Research in Second Language Learning
Mackey, A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108589284 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Meaningful interaction and affordances for language learning at a Zapotec revitalisation programme
Riestenberg, K. J. (2020) · Language Learning Journal · doi:10.1080/09571736.2020.1722205 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
“After an initial period of getting accustomed to these input floods, learners’ implicit language learning mechanisms kick in, and learning takes place at a much more rapid pace than it would without rich input (Long 2015, 2016).”
BackgroundArabic as a heritage language: A scoping review
Visonà, M. W., & Plonsky, L. (2020) · International Journal of Bilingualism · doi:10.1177/1367006919849110 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
“In order to examine the general types of designs employed, we distinguished between cross-sectional studies examining representative samples from different national backgrounds or levels of acquisition, longitudinal studies comparing a sample of learners over time, and cross-sectional studies with a control group that…”
BackgroundMethodEffects of CALL-mediated TBLT on motivation for L2 reading
Tavakoli, H., Lotfi, A. R., Biria, R., & Wang, S. (2019) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2019.1580916 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
“TBLT is still a relatively recent innovation – one whose implementation requires expertise on the part of course designers and classroom teachers, and a substantial investment of time and effort if it is to be successful (Long, 2016).”
BackgroundMeasurement of functional adequacy in different learning contexts
Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2022) · TASK Journal on Task-Based Language Teaching and Learning · doi:10.1075/task.00013.kui · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Research methods for IDs and TBLT: A substantive and methodological review
Bryfonski, L., Ku, Y., & Mackey, A. (2024) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263124000135 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
“Many researchers in our field have called for more long-term research (e.g., Long, 2016; Mackey & Goo, 2007).”
Dai, D. W. (2023) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/13621688221144836 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
“This finding corroborates the lamentation in Long (2016) where Long lambasted the disconnect between L2 teaching materials and L2 speakers’ genuine learning needs.”
BackgroundResultAgency and technology-mediated task repetition with young learners
Pinter, A. (2019) · Language Teaching for Young Learners · doi:10.1075/ltyl.00010.pin · Cited by 42 · see citing works
“Long (2016), whose task definition is widely used in ESL contexts, for example, promotes a real life needs-based approach to defining and selecting tasks for L2 learners but younger learners’ needs are often vague, or even non-existent in early compulsory English education and even if existent,…”
BackgroundMochizuki, N. (2017) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.1002/tesq.391 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
EFL Reformed Curriculum in Vietnam: An Understanding of Teachers’ Cognitions and Classroom Practices
Tran, N. G., Ha, X. V., & Trần, N. H. (2021) · RELC Journal · doi:10.1177/00336882211043670 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
“Task-based language teaching (TBLT) refers to a language teaching approach which employs tasks as the main tool in teaching and focuses on the use of purposeful and functional language (Bryfonski, 2020; Ellis, 2003, 2009; Ellis et al., 2019; Long, 2016).”
BackgroundA CALL FOR CAUTIOUS INTERPRETATION OF META-ANALYTIC REVIEWS
Boers, F., Bryfonski, L., Faez, F., & McKay, T. (2020) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263120000327 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
“Some TBLT proponents distinguish between programs that use tasks throughout (Long, 2016), and task-supported programs, where tasks are used alongside or in addition to other approaches, including those involving explicit instruction (Ellis, 2018).”
BackgroundMediating Innovation through Language Teacher Education
East, M. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009127998 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Crookes, G. V., & Ziegler, N. (2021) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci11060254 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
“Defining tasks remains a somewhat debated topic within the field of TBLT, as tasks and task-based language teaching are interpreted differently by different scholars [43], with Ellis [44] recently highlighting that the operationalization of “task” remains a “real issue” (p.”
BackgroundThe effects of different task sequences on novice L2 learners’ oral performance in the classroom
Kim, N. (2020) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168820937548 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
“From a theoretical perspective, Long (2016), an advocate of a strong version of TBLT, argued that ‘students in TBLT courses learn as much grammar and vocabulary, even at the beginner’s level, with instruction geared to learners’ processing capacity, and with the additional crucial advantage that…”
BackgroundCho, H., & Kim, Y. (2021) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/13621688211046740 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
“Although an extensive application of task-based language teaching (TBLT) has been observed in the last two decades (Long, 2015, 2016), there has been a lack of TBLT research on integrated writing tasks.”
Ha, X. V., Tran, N. G., & Trần, N. H. (2021) · The Qualitative Report · doi:10.46743/2160-3715/2021.5063 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
“As acknowledged by TBLT advocates in recent studies (Ellis, 2017; Long, 2016), in-service teacher education is a real issue for progress in TBLT.”
BackgroundAldosari, M. S., & Alsager, H. N. (2023) · BMC Psychology · doi:10.1186/s40359-023-01478-8 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
“A powerful TBLT framework is students-centered in that student’s ’notice’ language rules while engaging in communication activi - ties, contrary to the conventional teacher-oriented pres-entation-practice-production (PPP) strategy [63].”
BackgroundHow can register analysis inform task-based language teaching?
Crawford, W., & Zhang, M. (2021) · Register Studies · doi:10.1075/rs.20021.cra · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Pragmatics, tasks, and technology
González‐Lloret, M., & Ortega, L. (2018) · Task-based language teaching · doi:10.1075/tblt.10.08gon · Cited by 30 · see citing works
The Cognition Hypothesis, the Triadic Componential Framework and the SSARC Model
Robinson, P. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868327.013 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
From Needs Analysis to Task Selection, Design, and Sequencing
Gilabert, R., & Malicka, A. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868327.014 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
The effects of hybrid online planning and L2 proficiency on video-based speaking task performance
Wang, Z., Skehan, P., & Chen, G. (2019) · Instructed Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1558/isla.37398 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
The Role of Context in Young Learners’ Processes for Responding to Self‐Assessment Items
Butler, Y. G. (2018) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/modl.12459 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Meta-analysis to estimate the relative effectiveness of TBLT programs: Are we there yet?
Boers, F., & Faez, F. (2023) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/13621688231167573 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
“This could highlight the fundamental notion that tasks involve the use of language for the purposes that it serves in real life (Long, 2016), such as passing on information to some-one who does not already have this information, reading a manual to figure out how to use a newly purchased device,…”
New to School and New to Print: Everyday Peer Interaction Among Adolescent High School Newcomers
King, K. A., Bigelow, M., & Hirsi, A. (2017) · International Multilingual Research Journal · doi:10.1080/19313152.2017.1328958 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
“While there are multiple definitions of tasks currently circulating within the field (Long, 2016), most emphasize communication used to accomplish a particular (nonlinguistic) goal and are embedded in studies aiming to isolate learner variables (e.g., proficiency level) and/or task characteristics…”
BackgroundSova, L., & Timpe‐Laughlin, V. (2024) · Springer texts in education · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-69206-2_4 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Zhang, L. J., & Qiang, S. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.880408 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Task-Based Language Teaching as an Innovation
den Branden, K. V. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868327.035 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Learning pragmatics through tasks
Barón, J., Celaya, M. L., & Levkina, M. (2020) · Applied Pragmatics · doi:10.1075/ap.18010.bar · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Kim, Y., & Namkung, Y. (2024) · Annual Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0267190524000096 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
“Despite critiques of TBLT, several review papers (Ellis, 2017; Long, 2016) and meta-analyses (Bryfonski & McKay, 2019) have emphasized the abundant empirical support for the benefits of using tasks for L2 instruction.”
The relationship between differentiated instruction and learner levels of engagement at university
Moallemi, R. (2022) · Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning · doi:10.1108/jrit-07-2022-0041 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Why Task? Task as a Unit of Analysis for Language Education
Sasayama, S. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868327.004 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
East, M. (2020) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s026144481900048x · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Jia, S., & Harji, M. B. (2023) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-11586-y · Cited by 26 · see citing works
“Kukulska-Hulme (2018) presented a review article on mobile collaborative learning and Long (2016) examined TBL from multiple perspectives.”
BackgroundBygate, M., Samuda, V., & den Branden, K. V. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868327.003 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2025) · Task-based language teaching · doi:10.1075/tblt.17.08kui · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Task-Based Language Teaching; Potential Benefits and Possible Criticisms in Indonesian Contexts
Maulana, M. I. (2021) · Journal of English Teaching and Learning Issues · doi:10.21043/jetli.v4i2.12183 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
“Therefore, Long (2016) asserted that teachers’ role in TBLT is upgraded.”
BackgroundInfluentialUniversity Lecturers’ Task-Based Language Teaching Beliefs and Practices
Lam, H. T. L., Nguyen, S. V., & Nguyen, H. A. (2021) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci11110748 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Responding to the critics: Implementation of TBLT in Japan
Harris, J. (2018) · Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.17509/ijal.v8i1.11473 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
“Another issue brought up by teachers was assessment, something that is presently considered to be one of the major issues within TBLT (Long, 2016).”
BackgroundResearch trends in task-based language teaching: A bibliometric analysis from 1985 to 2020
Qin, J., & Lei, L. (2022) · Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.14746/ssllt.2022.12.3.3 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
“Hence, it constitutes a radical departure from the traditional, structural approaches that consider language as an object to be systematically taught and intentionally learned (Ellis et al., 2020; Long, 2016; Van den Branden, 2016).”
InfluentialData collection in the research on the effectiveness of corrective feedback
Li, S. (2018) · Language learning and language teaching · doi:10.1075/lllt.51.03li · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Torres–Martínez, S. (2017) · European Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1515/eujal-2016-0012 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
“…collaborative learning MP10: Individualize instruction It follows that the notion of tasks referring to “the real-world communicative uses to which learners will put the L2 beyond the classroom—the things they will do in and through the L2 (...)” (Long 2016:6), can be reframed cognitively.”
BackgroundKhezrlou, S. (2023) · Language Awareness · doi:10.1080/09658416.2023.2177659 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
“Long (2016), for instance, advocates a need to attract learners’ attention to form during task performance (main-task phase) in the form of corrective feedback, Skehan (1998) favors pre-task planning and task design options, Willis (1996) argues that concerns for accuracy could be dealt with in the…”
BackgroundZhang, Y., & Luo, S. (2018) · Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1515/cjal-2018-0022 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
In defence of a modular curriculum for tasks
Ellis, R. (2020) · ELT Journal · doi:10.1093/elt/ccaa015 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Task-based approaches to teaching and assessing pragmatics
Taguchi, N., & Kim, Y. (2018) · Task-based language teaching · doi:10.1075/tblt.10.01tag · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Alazemi, A. F. T., Gheisari, A., & Patra, I. (2023) · Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education · doi:10.1186/s40862-023-00220-6 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
“Long (2016) stresses the necessity of correcting language forms when students are performing communicative tasks, not before.”
BackgroundKim, Y., Kang, S., D’Arienzo, M., & Taguchi, N. (2023) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/13621688231195876 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
“1 Theoretical foundation: TBLT Since the 1980s, TBLT has gained considerable attention in the areas of instructed SLA and L2 pedagogy (e.g. East, 2021; Ellis, 2003; Long, 2015, 2016; Samuda & Bygate, 2008).”
InfluentialInteraction, Feedback and Task Research in Second Language Learning : Methods and Design
Mackey, A. (2020) · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Tabari, M. A., Farahanynia, M., & Botes, E. (2024) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2024.100912 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
L2 learning outcomes of a research-based digital app for Japanese children
Bang, H. J., Setoguchi, E., Mackey, A., & Fujii, A. (2024) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263124000147 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“…used in this study were designed to engage young learners in authentic contexts (i.e., situations that are relevant or familiar to children based on their lives outside of the language learning app) (Long, 2015; 2016), which has also been shown to increase engagement and interest (Pinter, 2019).”
BackgroundMethodNoroozi, M., & Taheri, S. (2022) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2022.2105775 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
“Therefore, tasks play a pivotal role in designing, implementing, and evaluating a TBLT educational framework (Ellis, 2017; M. H. Long, 2016; M. Long, 2015).”
MethodPeltzer, K., Siekmann, L., Parr, J. M., & Busse, V. (2022) · Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft · doi:10.1007/s11618-022-01089-w · Cited by 18 · see citing works
“TBLT structures teaching around relevant tasks and initiates learners’ active use of the target language by engaging them in problem solving (Ellis 1999; Long 2016; Van den Branden 2006).”
BackgroundBridging the gap: a study of academic language-learning needs of Saudi international students
Alkutbi, D. (2018) · UVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria) · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Jie, L., & Zou, W. (2021) · Journal of Education for Teaching International Research and Pedagogy · doi:10.1080/02607476.2021.1989287 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Testing a Research-Based Digital Learning Tool
Bang, H. J., Olander, K., & Lenihan, E. (2020) · CALICO Journal · doi:10.1558/cj.40544 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Chen, J. (2020) · TESOL Quarterly (Print) · doi:10.1002/tesq.550 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
A review of learner motivation and engagement research in task-based language teaching
Namkung, Y., & Kim, Y. (2024) · Task-based language teaching · doi:10.1075/tblt.16.07nam · Cited by 12 · see citing works
The Case for a True Task-Based Curriculum for Medical Spanish Courses
Coss, M. D. (2022) · Teaching and Learning in Medicine · doi:10.1080/10401334.2021.2020120 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Task-Based Language Assessment
Norris, J. M., & East, M. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868327.029 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
The contributions of working memory and pre-task explicit instruction to L2 oral performance
Sadeghi, M., & Pourhaji, M. (2020) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2020.102409 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Ellis, R. (2024) · Task-based language teaching · doi:10.1075/tblt.16.12ell · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Teacher IDs and task adaptations
Gurzynski‐Weiss, L., Bryfonski, L., & Reagan, D. (2024) · Task-based language teaching · doi:10.1075/tblt.16.11gur · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Taking communication to task once more – a further decade on
East, M. (2024) · Language Learning Journal · doi:10.1080/09571736.2024.2305424 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“(Long 2016: 28–29) Let us look forward to what the next ten years of scholarship and practice will bring.”
InfluentialSouzandehfar, M., & Ibrahim, K. A. A.-A. (2023) · Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education · doi:10.1186/s40862-023-00218-0 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
“According to TBLT, it’s critical to address linguistic forms when students are engaging in a communicative task rather than before (Long, 2016).”
BackgroundRahimi, S. (2022) · Education Research International · doi:10.1155/2022/8041206 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
East, M. (2020) · Language Learning Journal · doi:10.1080/09571736.2020.1719433 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C. (2019) · Task-Based Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/9781108643689.010 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
L2 task engagement: A research agenda
Hiver, P. V., Dao, P., & Yamazaki, J. S. (2025) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444825101043 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
“Scholars must remain mindful of the somewhat varying definitions of tasks that can create confusion in synthetic work on the topic (Ellis, 2017; Long, 2016).”
Sim, S., Kim, Y., & Ku, K. (2025) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.1002/tesq.70010 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Developing transferable skills in virtual exchange
O’Dowd, R. (2023) · Journal of virtual exchange · doi:10.21827/jve.6.41362 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Khezrlou, S. (2022) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2022.2033789 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“Although some scholars (e.g., Long, 2016) advocate delaying a FonF to task performance using corrective feedback, others (Skehan, 1998) underscore the role of pre-task preparation such as pre-task planning or the inclusion of attention to form before, during and after the task performance (e.g.,…”
BackgroundTask-Based Language Teaching: Early Days, Now and into the Future
Ellis, R. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-4226-5_4 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Tabari, M. A., & Johnson, M. D. (2025) · Research Methods in Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1016/j.rmal.2025.100225 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
- Authors
- Long, M. H.
- Affiliations
- University of Maryland, College Park (US)
- Corresponding author
- Long, Michael H.
- ORCID
- Long, Michael H.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Applied Linguistics
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2016-03
- Volume
- 36
- Pages
- 5-33
- ISSN
- 0267-1905 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-6356
- OpenAlex
- W2324748824
- Cited by
- 359
- References
- 108
- Citations by year
- 2026: 25 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 71 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 134.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Annual Review of Applied Linguistics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Second Language Learning and Teaching
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Keywords
- task-based language teaching, task-based language learning, classroom implementation, language teaching, second language acquisition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review