Sequences and Processes in Language Learning
Abstract
This chapter contains sections titled: Learner Language or Interlanguage Sequences in Language Learning Processes Sequences, Processes, and Instruction: Five Generalizations and a Coda References
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Evidence for the existence of developmental sequences is long-standing and robust.
“Evidence for the existence of developmental sequences is long-standing and robust (for review, see Ortega, 2009).”
From In Defense of Tasks and TBLT: Nonissues and Real Issues (2016) · cites this paper as Ortega, 2009
Cited by
Sorted by citations
In Defense of Tasks and TBLT: Nonissues and Real Issues
Long, M. H. (2016) · Annual Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0267190515000057 · Cited by 359 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ortega, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Hawaii System (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ortega, Lourdes
- ORCID
- Ortega, Lourdes
- Venue
- The Handbook of Language Teaching
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-07-10
- Pages
- 81-105
- OpenAlex
- W1555094397
- Cited by
- 73
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 5 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and Language Analysis
- Keywords
- language learning process, interlanguage, language teaching, second language acquisition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
