Cited by 22Microbial bioremediation and biosurfactantsMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and BioproductionBacterial Genetics and Biotechnology

Metabolic Engineering for Large‐Scale Environmental Bioremediation

Nikel, Pablo I., de Lorenzo, Víctor·2021·Metabolic Engineering

Abstract

Designing biological agents for counteracting the noxious effects of chemical pollutants includes – but goes beyond – engineering biodegradative pathways in suitable microbial hosts. The soil bacterium Pseudomonas putida has emerged as a test bed for many of the issues that need to be tackled in the way of devising safe and efficacious bioremediation strategies. The performance of pollution-cleanup agents in large, open environments and under diverse conditions demands traits different of those which would suffice for the controlled circumstances of a bioreactor or a laboratory. Sophisticated molecular tools, specifically tailored to secure the delivery of the desired catalytic activities in situ, have been developed to further expand the catabolic repertoire of P. putida to this end. Importance. Due to the global environmental deterioration brought about by urban, agricultural, and industrial activities, deploying bioremediation interventions for curbing chemical pollution has expanded from well-located sites to large-scale, even planet-wide scenarios. The onset of systems and synthetic biology is empowering the field for addressing environmental pollution problems that were considered intractable before, including reversal of CO2 emission and elimination of plastics and micropollutants. The repertoire of biological agents that can be engineered for this purpose includes not only specialized bacterial strains but also communities and “super spreaders” of beneficial propertie…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/9783527823468.ch22

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Nikel, P. I., & de Lorenzo, V.
Affiliations
Novo Nordisk Foundation (DK)
Venue
Metabolic Engineering
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-06-04
Pages
859-890
ISSN
1096-7176 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3173047361
Cited by
22
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Metabolic Engineering (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microbial bioremediation and biosurfactants
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Keywords
bioremediation, Pseudomonas putida, environmental microbiome, horizontal gene transfer, gene dissemination, plastic biodegradation, micropollutant removal, synthetic biology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review