Cited by 73Adult and Continuing Education TopicsLabour Market and MigrationEducation Systems and Policy

Women, work, and learning

Bierema, Laura L.·2001·New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education

Abstract

Women are disadvantaged when it comes to opportunity and learning. Adult educators can take steps to begin changing women's secondary status in the workplace.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ace.40

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bierema, L. L.
Affiliations
University of Georgia (US)
Corresponding author
Bierema, Laura L.
Venue
New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-12
Volume
2001
Issue
92
Pages
53-62
ISSN
  • 1052-2891 (ISSN-L)
  • 1536-0717
OpenAlex
W2008395598
Cited by
73
References
5
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
18.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Adult and Continuing Education Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Labour Market and Migration
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education Systems and Policy
Keywords
women in the workplace, gender inequality, adult education, workplace learning, gender equity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review