Cited by 93Innovative Teaching and Learning MethodsInnovative Education and Learning PracticesEducational Strategies and Epistemologies

Transfer of learning: paradoxes for learners

Open access
Simons, P.R.J·1999·International Journal of Educational Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0883-0355(99)00025-7

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Simons, P. R. J.
Affiliations
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Corresponding author
Simons, P.R.J
Venue
International Journal of Educational Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-01
Volume
31
Issue
7
Pages
577-589
ISSN
0883-0355 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2156730760
Cited by
93
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
6.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • International Journal of Educational Research (publishedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
Keywords
transfer of learning, prior knowledge, tacit knowledge, near transfer, far transfer, meta-learning, knowledge application, instructional design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review