Cited by 115Reading and Literacy DevelopmentNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismSecond Language Acquisition and Learning

Comprehension skill and word‐to‐text integration processes

Perfetti, Charles, Yang, Chin‐Lung, Schmalhofer, Franz·2008·Applied Cognitive Psychology

Abstract

We examine comprehension skill differences in the processes of word‐to‐text integration, the connection of the meaning of a word, as it is read, to a representation of the text. We review two ‘on‐line’ integration studies using event related potentials (ERPs) to provide fine‐grain temporal data on the word‐to‐text processes of adult readers. The studies demonstrate indicators for word‐to‐text integration and show differences in these indicators as a function of adult reading comprehension skill. For skilled comprehenders, integration processes were reflected in N400 indicators when a critical word had an explicit link to a word in the prior text and by both N400 and P300 indicators when its meaning was a paraphrase of a prior word. When forward inferences were required for subsequent word‐to‐text integration, effects for skilled comprehenders were not reliable. Less skilled comprehenders showed delayed and less robust ERP effects, especially when meaning paraphrase was the basis of the integration. We discuss the significance of skill differences in integration processes with a focus on the use of context‐dependent word meaning as a possible source of these differences. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/acp.1419

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Working memory provides temporary storage and updating needed to integrate word-reading and language processes to produce comprehension.

    “Integral to the reading process, working memory provides the temporary storage and updating of information needed to integrate these word-reading and language processes to produce a level of comprehension (Perfetti et al., 2008)”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Perfetti, C., Yang, C., & Schmalhofer, F.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Osnabrück University (DE)
Corresponding author
Perfetti, Charles
Venue
Applied Cognitive Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-03-11
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
303-318
ISSN
  • 0888-4080 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0720
OpenAlex
W2099712893
Cited by
115
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Applied Cognitive Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Keywords
reading comprehension, N400, P300, event-related potentials, context-dependent word meaning, paraphrase, forward inference, adult readers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review