The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Improving Unfamiliar Face Matching by Masking the External Facial Features
Abstract
Summary: Counter‐terrorism and crime prevention often depend on our ability to match images of unfamiliar faces. For example, when issuing passports, staff must establish an applicant's identity by comparing the submitted photograph witht those in the database of current passports to ensure that multiple documents are not issued to the same person under different names. Previous research has shown that this is a difficult and error prone task. We suggest that this ‘passport problem’ may be due to an over‐reliance on the appearance of external facial features that can be unreliable cues to identity. Compatible with this explanation, we demonstrate that in difficult trials involving a change of appearance or attempted fraud involving a similar looking foil, participants are better able to determine whether two images are of the same person when shown only the internal features of the faces rather than whole images. This discovery has significant practical implications and could form the basis of a procedure to improve the detection of identity fraud.Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Performance with matching unfamiliar adult faces can be improved by displaying only the internal features.
“Indeed, there is some evidence to suggest that performance with matching unfamiliar adult faces can be improved by displaying only the internal features (Kemp et al., 2016).”
From Unfamiliar face matching with photographs of infants and children (2018) · cites this paper as Kemp et al., 2016
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- 10.1068/p5675 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1982.tb01795.x · DOI
- 10.1037/1076-898X.5.4.339 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/1076-898X.7.3.207 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3758/BRM.42.1.286 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/1467-9280.00144 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1068/p3335 · DOI
- 10.1080/13506280444000021 · DOI
- 10.1037/a00273930720(199706)11 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0027393 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199706)11:3<211 · DOI
- 10.3758/BF03193433 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1068/p3027 · DOI
- 10.3758/BF03342823 · DOI
- 10.1080/00450610802537960 · DOI
- 10.3758/BF03207704 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0084754 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0103510 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1068/p140737 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Forensic Facial Comparison: Current Status, Limitations, and Future Directions
Bacci, N., Davimes, J. G., Steyn, M., & Briers, N. (2021) · Biology · doi:10.3390/biology10121269 · Cited by 26
Unfamiliar face matching with photographs of infants and children
Kramer, R. S. S., Mulgrew, J., & Reynolds, M. G. (2018) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.5010 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Kemp, R. I., Caon, A., Howard, M., & Brooks, K. R.
- Affiliations
- School of Psychology University of New South Wales Sydney Australia
- Department of Psychology Macquarie University Sydney Australia
- Venue
- Applied Cognitive Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-06
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 622-627
- ISSN
- 0888-4080
- 1099-0720
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review