Cited by 20

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Improving Unfamiliar Face Matching by Masking the External Facial Features

Kemp, Richard I., Caon, Alita, Howard, Mark, Brooks, Kevin R.·2016·Applied Cognitive Psychology

Abstract

Summary: Counter‐terrorism and crime prevention often depend on our ability to match images of unfamiliar faces. For example, when issuing passports, staff must establish an applicant's identity by comparing the submitted photograph witht those in the database of current passports to ensure that multiple documents are not issued to the same person under different names. Previous research has shown that this is a difficult and error prone task. We suggest that this ‘passport problem’ may be due to an over‐reliance on the appearance of external facial features that can be unreliable cues to identity. Compatible with this explanation, we demonstrate that in difficult trials involving a change of appearance or attempted fraud involving a similar looking foil, participants are better able to determine whether two images are of the same person when shown only the internal features of the faces rather than whole images. This discovery has significant practical implications and could form the basis of a procedure to improve the detection of identity fraud.Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/acp.3239

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Performance with matching unfamiliar adult faces can be improved by displaying only the internal features.

    “Indeed, there is some evidence to suggest that performance with matching unfamiliar adult faces can be improved by displaying only the internal features (Kemp et al., 2016).”

    From Unfamiliar face matching with photographs of infants and children (2018) · cites this paper as Kemp et al., 2016

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. 10.1068/p5675 · DOI
  2. 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1982.tb01795.x · DOI
  3. 10.1037/1076-898X.5.4.339 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1037/1076-898X.7.3.207 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.3758/BRM.42.1.286 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1111/1467-9280.00144 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1068/p3335 · DOI
  8. 10.1080/13506280444000021 · DOI
  9. 10.1037/a00273930720(199706)11 · DOI
  10. 10.1037/a0027393 · DOI
  11. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199706)11:3<211 · DOI
  12. 10.3758/BF03193433 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1068/p3027 · DOI
  14. 10.3758/BF03342823 · DOI
  15. 10.1080/00450610802537960 · DOI
  16. 10.3758/BF03207704 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1371/journal.pone.0084754 · DOI
  18. 10.1371/journal.pone.0103510 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1068/p140737 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kemp, R. I., Caon, A., Howard, M., & Brooks, K. R.
Affiliations
  • School of Psychology University of New South Wales Sydney Australia
  • Department of Psychology Macquarie University Sydney Australia
Venue
Applied Cognitive Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-06
Volume
30
Issue
4
Pages
622-627
ISSN
  • 0888-4080
  • 1099-0720
Cited by
20
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review