The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A test of age bias in children and adults in prospective person memory
Abstract
Children are disproportionately represented amongst missing people in the United States. Search campaigns target adults to search for missing children, but age biases in face recognition may affect adults' efficacy at sighting missing children. We hypothesized that own‐age biases in children (7–9 years; N = 105) and adults (18–30 years; N = 108) would affect their ability to sight children and adults. Participants completed a prospective person memory task with a simultaneous ongoing task to simulate multi‐tasking while searching for missing people. Both child and adult participants were more accurate at sighting missing adults than missing children. Adults exhibited an own‐age bias. Adult participants were more accurate at sightings than child participants. In conclusion, adults were better suited to search for missing people of all ages than children, and this pattern of results may be impacted by experience with faces.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Normal aging and prospective memory.
Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (1990) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037//0278-7393.16.4.717 · Cited by 1,391
Brysbaert, M. (2019) · Journal of Cognition · doi:10.5334/joc.72 · Cited by 996
The Child Affective Facial Expression (CAFE) set: validity and reliability from untrained adults
LoBue, V., & Thrasher, C. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01532 · Cited by 356
The own-age bias in face recognition: a meta-analytic and theoretical review
Rhodes, M. G., & Anastasi, J. S. (2012) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0025750 · Cited by 346
An own-age bias in face recognition for children and older adults
Anastasi, J. S., & Rhodes, M. G. (2005) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03206441 · Cited by 270
Simons, R. L., & Whitbeck, L. B. (1991) · Journal of Family Issues · doi:10.1177/019251391012003007 · Cited by 266
The Impact of Childhood Sexual Abuse on Later Sexual Victimization among Runaway Youth
Tyler, K. A., Hoyt, D. R., Whitbeck, L. B., & Cauce, A. M. (2001) · Journal of Research on Adolescence · doi:10.1111/1532-7795.00008 · Cited by 211
Development of face recognition
Chung, M., & Thomson, D. M. (1995) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1995.tb02546.x · Cited by 182
Evidence for an Own-Age Bias in Face Recognition.
Anastasi, J. S., & Rhodes, M. G. (2006) · North American journal of psychology · Cited by 153
Rapid communication: The own-age face recognition bias in children and adults
Hills, P. J., & Lewis, M. B. (2010) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470218.2010.537926 · Cited by 118
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Lampinen J. M., 2009, Applied memory, 167
Cited by
Still being checked.
Metadata
- Authors
- Moore, K. N., Hanan, R. L., & Gaona, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Utah (US)
- Oklahoma State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Moore, Kara N.
- ORCID
- Moore, Kara N.
- Venue
- Applied Cognitive Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2023-10-17
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 0888-4080 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0720
- OpenAlex
- W4387730760
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 32
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Applied Cognitive Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Oklahoma State University
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
- Keywords
- own-age bias, person memory, face recognition (cognition), missing children, search for missing persons, age differences, children, adults, multitasking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review