The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An own-age bias in face recognition for children and older adults
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In typical perceivers, adult face memory performance is reduced for young children's faces.
“in typical perceivers, evidence suggests that adult face memory performance is reduced for young children’s faces (Anastasi & Rhodes, 2005; Chance et al., 1986; Rhodes & Anastasi, 2012)”
From Enhanced Matching of Children’s Faces in “Super-Recognisers” But Not High-Contact Controls (2020) · cites this paper as Anastasi & Rhodes, 2005
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- Adams-Price, C. (1992). Eyewitness memory and aging: Predictors of accuracy in recall and person recognition.Psychology & Aging,7, 602–608. · DOI
- Anastasi, J. S., &Rhodes, M. G. (2006). Evidence for an own-age bias in face recognition.North American Journal of Psychology,8, 237–253.
- Bäckman, L. (1991). Recognition memory across the adult life span: The role of prior knowledge.Memory & Cognition,19, 63–71. · DOI
- Bartlett, J. C., &Leslie, J. E. (1986). Aging and memory for faces versus single views of faces.Memory & Cognition,14, 371–381. · DOI
- Brigham, J. C., &Malpass, R. S. (1985). The role of experience and contact in the recognition of faces of own- and other-race persons.Journal of Social Issues,41, 139–155. · DOI
- Chance, J. E., &Goldstein, A. G. (1984). Face-recognition memory: Implications for children’s eyewitness testimony.Journal of Social Issues,40, 69–85. · DOI
- Chung, M. S. (1997). Face recognition: Effects of age of subjects and age of stimulus faces.Korean Journal of Developmental Psychology,10, 167–176.
- Cohen, J. (1988).Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.
- Fulton, A., &Bartlett, J. C. (1991). Young and old faces in young and old heads: The factor of age in face recognition.Psychology & Aging,6, 623–630. · DOI
- Furl, N., Phillips, P. J., &O’Toole, A. J. (2002). Face recognition algorithms and the other-race effect: Computational mechanisms for a developmental contact hypothesis.Cognitive Science,26, 797–815. · DOI
- Glanzer, M., &Adams, J. K. (1985). The mirror effect in recognition memory.Memory & Cognition,13, 8–20. · DOI · Paper page
- Glanzer, M., &Adams, J. K. (1990). The mirror effect in recognition memory: Data and theory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 5–16. · DOI
- Levin, D. T. (2000). Race as a visual feature: Using visual search and perceptual discrimination tasks to understand face categories and the cross-race recognition deficit.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,129, 559–574. · DOI
- Lindholm, T. (2005). Own-age biases in verbal person memory.Memory,13, 21–30. · DOI
- List, J. (1986). Age and schematic differences in the reliability of eyewitness testimony.Developmental Psychology,22, 50–57. · DOI
- Mason, S. E. (1986). Age and gender as factors in facial recognition and identification.Experimental Aging Research,12, 151–154. · DOI
- Meissner, C. A., &Brigham, J. C. (2001). Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review.Psychology, Public Policy, & Law,7, 3–35. · DOI · Paper page
- Perfect, T. J., &Harris, L. J. (2003). Adult age differences in unconscious transference: Source confusion or identity blending?Memory & Cognition,31, 570–580. · DOI
- Perfect, T. J., &Moon, H. (2005). The own-age effect in face recognition. In J. Duncan, L. Phillips, & P. McLeod (Eds.),Measuring the mind: Speed, control, and age (pp. 317–340). Oxford: Oxford University Press. · DOI
- Rodin, M. J. (1987). Who is memorable to whom: A study of cognitive disregard.Social Cognition,5, 144–165. · DOI
- Searcy, J. [H.], Bartlett, J. C., &Memon, A. (2000). Influence of post-event narratives, line-up conditions and individual differences on false identification by young and older eyewitnesses.Legal & Criminological Psychology,5, 219–235. · DOI
- Searcy, J. H., Bartlett, J. C., Memon, A., &Swanson, K. (2001). Aging and lineup performance at long retention intervals: Effects of metamemory and context reinstatement.Journal of Applied Psychology,86, 207–214. · DOI
- Slone, A. E., Brigham, J. C., &Meissner, C. A. (2000). Social and cognitive factors affecting the own-race bias in Whites.Basic & Applied Social Psychology,22, 71–84. · DOI
- Snodgrass, J. G., &Corwin, J. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,117, 34–50. · DOI
- Sporer, S. L. (2001). Recognizing faces of other ethnic groups: An integration of theories.Psychology, Public Policy, & Law,7, 36–97. · DOI
- Valentine, T. (1991). A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,43A, 161–204. · DOI
- Wright, D. B., &Stroud, J. S. (2002). Age differences in lineup identification accuracy: People are better with their own age.Law & Human Behavior,26, 641–654. · DOI
- Yarmey, A. D. (1993). Adult age and gender differences in eyewitness recall in field settings.Journal of Applied Social Psychology,23, 1921–1932. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Golarai, G., Ghahremani, D. G., Whitfield-Gabrieli, S., Reiss, A., Eberhardt, J. L., Gabrieli, J. D. E., & Grill-Spector, K. (2007) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1865 · Cited by 541
MultiBench: Multiscale Benchmarks for Multimodal Representation Learning
Liang, P. P., Lyu, Y., Fan, X., Wu, Z., Cheng, Y., Wu, J., Chen, L., Wu, P., Lee, M. A., Zhu, Y., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.07502 · Cited by 85
Enhanced Matching of Children’s Faces in “Super-Recognisers” But Not High-Contact Controls
Bate, S., Bennetts, R., Murray, E., & Portch, E. (2020) · i-Perception · doi:10.1177/2041669520944420 · Cited by 12
A test of age bias in children and adults in prospective person memory
Moore, K. N., Hanan, R. L., & Gaona, K. (2024) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.4140
Metadata
- Authors
- Anastasi, J. S., & Rhodes, M. G.
- Venue
- Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
- Published
- 2005-12
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1043-1047
- ISSN
- 1069-9384
- 1531-5320
- Cited by
- 270
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
