The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Matching the faces of robbers captured on video
Abstract
Recent research has shown that unfamiliar face matching from both high‐ and low‐quality closed circuit television video images to photographs is highly prone to error, even when viewpoint and expression are matched as closely as possible. The current experiments made use of a filmed, staged reconstruction of a bank raid that was captured on CCTV and on high‐quality broadcasting video. Experiment 1 tested the ability of members of the public to match actors captured on CCTV to photo‐spreads containing similar‐looking distractors. Further experiments, each testing different groups of subjects, investigated matching ability using both high‐quality photographs (Experiment 2) and broadcast‐quality video material (Experiment 3). Experiment 3 also investigated the effect of disguising hairstyle, and varied whether or not the target was present in the photo line‐up. The results of these experiments confirm those of previous work, that matching the identity of unfamiliar faces is highly fallible, even when high‐quality footage is used. Experiments 4 and 5 tested matching ability using two‐alternative forced‐choice and single‐item verification tasks. Performance remained highly error‐prone even with the simplest question asked. The legal implications of the results are discussed. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
All forms of facial comparison accuracy will suffer when using low-resolution analogue CCTV images, even if image quality is good in other respects.
“In general, all forms of facial comparison accuracy will suffer when using low-resolution analogue CCTV images, even if image quality is good in other respects [48,81,93,122].”
From Forensic Facial Comparison: Current Status, Limitations, and Future Directions (2021) · cites this paper as [81]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- 10.1037/1076-898X.5.4.339 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3758/BF03333151 · DOI
- 10.1111/1467-9280.00144 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1975.tb01437.x · DOI
- 10.1068/p080431 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199706)11:3<211::AID-ACP430>3.0.CO;2-O · DOI
- 10.1037/h0031646 · DOI
- 10.1037/0278-7393.3.4.406 · DOI
- Shepherd JW, 1982, Identification Evidence. A Psychological Evaluation
- 10.1037/0003-066X.48.5.553 · DOI
- 10.1068/p140737 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Forensic Facial Comparison: Current Status, Limitations, and Future Directions
Bacci, N., Davimes, J. G., Steyn, M., & Briers, N. (2021) · Biology · doi:10.3390/biology10121269 · Cited by 26
Validation of forensic facial comparison by morphological analysis in photographic and CCTV samples
Bacci, N., Houlton, T. M. R., Briers, N., & Steyn, M. (2021) · International Journal of Legal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00414-021-02512-3 · Cited by 23
Finding Makhubu: A morphological forensic facial comparison
Houlton, T. M. R., & Steyn, M. (2018) · Forensic Science International · doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.01.022 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Henderson, Z., Bruce, V., & Burton, A. M.
- Venue
- Applied Cognitive Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-07
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 445-464
- ISSN
- 0888-4080
- 1099-0720
- Cited by
- 96
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review