Cited by 96

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Matching the faces of robbers captured on video

Henderson, Zoë, Bruce, Vicki, Burton, A. Mike·2001·Applied Cognitive Psychology

Abstract

Recent research has shown that unfamiliar face matching from both high‐ and low‐quality closed circuit television video images to photographs is highly prone to error, even when viewpoint and expression are matched as closely as possible. The current experiments made use of a filmed, staged reconstruction of a bank raid that was captured on CCTV and on high‐quality broadcasting video. Experiment 1 tested the ability of members of the public to match actors captured on CCTV to photo‐spreads containing similar‐looking distractors. Further experiments, each testing different groups of subjects, investigated matching ability using both high‐quality photographs (Experiment 2) and broadcast‐quality video material (Experiment 3). Experiment 3 also investigated the effect of disguising hairstyle, and varied whether or not the target was present in the photo line‐up. The results of these experiments confirm those of previous work, that matching the identity of unfamiliar faces is highly fallible, even when high‐quality footage is used. Experiments 4 and 5 tested matching ability using two‐alternative forced‐choice and single‐item verification tasks. Performance remained highly error‐prone even with the simplest question asked. The legal implications of the results are discussed. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/acp.718

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • All forms of facial comparison accuracy will suffer when using low-resolution analogue CCTV images, even if image quality is good in other respects.

    “In general, all forms of facial comparison accuracy will suffer when using low-resolution analogue CCTV images, even if image quality is good in other respects [48,81,93,122].”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. 10.1037/1076-898X.5.4.339 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.3758/BF03333151 · DOI
  3. 10.1111/1467-9280.00144 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1975.tb01437.x · DOI
  5. 10.1068/p080431 · DOI
  6. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199706)11:3<211::AID-ACP430>3.0.CO;2-O · DOI
  7. 10.1037/h0031646 · DOI
  8. 10.1037/0278-7393.3.4.406 · DOI
  9. Shepherd JW, 1982, Identification Evidence. A Psychological Evaluation
  10. 10.1037/0003-066X.48.5.553 · DOI
  11. 10.1068/p140737 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Henderson, Z., Bruce, V., & Burton, A. M.
Venue
Applied Cognitive Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-07
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
445-464
ISSN
  • 0888-4080
  • 1099-0720
Cited by
96
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review