Cited by 18Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and TherapiesPharmaceutical Economics and PolicyHealthcare Policy and Management

Impact of the medicare modernization act of 2003 on utilization and spending for medicare part B–covered biologics in rheumatoid arthritis

Open access
Doshi, Jalpa A., Li, Pengxiang, Puig, Andrea·2010·Arthritis Care & Research

Abstract

Objective: To examine changes in utilization and expenditures for infliximab in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients associated with the 2 changes implemented by the Medicare Prescription Drug Improvement and Modernization Act (MMA) of 2003, specifically 1) reductions in physician reimbursement for Part B drugs between 2003 and 2005 and 2) availability of alternative RA biologics in 2006. Methods: Using 2002–2006 5% Medicare files, nationally representative estimates of infliximab use and expenditures were estimated in annual cross‐sectional samples of RA beneficiaries. Infliximab initiation and continuation rates were estimated in 2‐year longitudinal cohorts (2005–2006 versus 2002–2003, 2003–2004, and 2004–2005). Results: Total payments (in 2006 dollars) for infliximab increased from $357 million in 2002 to $492 million in 2006. The largest annual increase in infliximab payments occurred in the pre‐MMA period from 2002 to 2003, wherein payments per RA patient increased by 31%. From 2003 to 2004, despite the reduction in payments brought by the MMA, there was a 4% increase in total expenditures for infliximab per RA patient driven by an increase in utilization factors. Total payments for infliximab per RA patient actually decreased from 2004 to 2005, when reimbursement was further reduced. Continuation and initiation rates for infliximab use remained unchanged in 2006, as compared with previous years. Conclusion: Infliximab expenditures increased from 2002 to 2006, yet the passage of the MMA was associated with a remarkable slowdown in the rate of increase in expenditures. There was no evidence of significant substitution of infliximab with other biologics made available in 2006.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/acr.20010

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [6]Federal register/ rules and regulations 2004 November 15 Monday Vol. 69 No. 219

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Doshi, J. A., Li, P., & Puig, A.
Affiliations
  • Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Venue
Arthritis Care & Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-02-25
Volume
62
Issue
3
Pages
354-361
ISSN
  • 0893-7524 (ISSN-L)
  • 2151-464X
  • 2151-4658
OpenAlex
W1990713219
Cited by
18
References
16
Citations by year
2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Arthritis Care & Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (1-R01-AG024451-01, R01AG024451)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
Keywords
Medicare Part B, Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003, infliximab, rheumatoid arthritis, biologic therapy, medication use, health care expenditure, physician reimbursement, drug substitution, Medicare beneficiaries
MeSH terms
Infliximab, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Biological Factors, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Reimbursement, Incentive, United States, Medicare Part B, Medicare Part D

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review