Cited by 7

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Prevalence of Autoimmune Diseases in Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: An Epidemiological Study Using A Global Network of Health Care Organizations

Khandwala, Pushti, Desai, Devashish, Lau, Arthur·2025·ACR Open Rheumatology

Abstract

Objective: Evaluate prevalence of new onset autoimmune conditions (ACs) after commencement of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Methods: This retrospective observational study was done using TriNetX. Patients with neoplasm for which ICIs were approved were stratified into two groups based on ICI use. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard models and Kaplan Meier method were used to assess risk of developing ACs among the groups. Subgroup analysis was done to evaluate risk of ACs in patients receiving cytotoxic T‐lymphocyte‐associated protein 4 inhibitor (CTLA4i) versus program cell death protein 1 inhibitor (PD1i) and program death ligand 1 inhibitor (PDL1i) inhibitors and combination treatment (CT) (CTLA4 + PD1i/PDL1i) versus PD1i/PDL1i. Results: Patients who received ICIs (2.03% of total population) were younger (68.7 ± 12.6 vs 71.8 ± 13.9; P < 0.001), predominantly male (54% vs 41%; P < 0.0001), and White (68% vs 58%; P < 0.0001), had lower odds of developing systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) (0.366% vs 0.437%, odds ratio [OR] 0.837; P = 0.0005) and systemic sclerosis (0.108% vs 0.135%, OR 0.796; P = 0.0151), and had higher odds of developing rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (2.194% vs 1.752%, OR 1.258; P < 0.0001 with hazard ratio 1.746; P < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in developing vasculitis, dermatopolymyositis, and psoriatic arthritis when compared to patients who did not receive ICIs. The prevalence of ACs remained true after propensity score matching, except that there was no difference compared with the prevalence of SLE (0.37% [n = 391] vs 0.393% n = 415], OR 0.942 [0.82–1.082]; P = 0.3970). Conclusion: Patients receiving ICIs have an increased risk of developing ACs, especially RA. There needs to be a high index of suspicion and awareness about ACs for prescribers of ICIs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/acr2.11787

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Targeting GD3 ganglioside carries a risk of autoimmunity, particularly in older individuals with pre-existing immune dysregulation.

    “targeting this pathway carries a risk of autoimmunity, particularly in older individuals with pre-existing immune dysregulation59,60.”

    From Emerging strategies in senotherapeutics: from broad-spectrum senolysis to precision reprogramming (2026) · cites this paper as [59]

    The Introduction says that blocking immune checkpoints may break self-tolerance and cause immune-related adverse effects, and the Discussion reports increased autoimmune-condition risk among patients receiving checkpoint inhibitors. The paper does not address GD3 ganglioside targeting or show that the risk is particularly high in older individuals with pre-existing immune dysregulation. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. 10.1056/NEJMoa1003466 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1186/s13045-021-01056-8 · DOI
  3. 10.1002/art.41068 · DOI
  4. 10.1038/s41584-022-00841-0 · DOI
  5. 10.21037/atm-20-8124 · DOI
  6. 10.4110/in.2022.22.e2 · DOI
  7. 10.3390/ph17020252 · DOI
  8. 10.1002/acr.23177 · DOI
  9. 10.2217/imt-2017-0108 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2018.02.011 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80089-8 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.3390/cells8101213 · DOI
  13. 10.3390/ijms21093389 · DOI
  14. 10.1136/lupus-2018-000313 · DOI
  15. 10.4049/jimmunol.0903401 · DOI
  16. 10.4049/jimmunol.1202382 · DOI
  17. 10.4049/jimmunol.0901652 · DOI
  18. 10.1038/ni.2496 · DOI
  19. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215819 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.autrev.2020.102596 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2014.11.006 · DOI
  22. 10.1186/ar3495 · DOI
  23. 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000550 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.03.016 · DOI
  25. 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000222 · DOI
  26. 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2004.01668.x · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.alit.2021.08.005 · DOI
  28. 10.1073/pnas.1616848114 · DOI
  29. 10.1007/s11926-019-0828-7 · DOI
  30. 10.1007/s10067-018-4177-0 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14368-1 · DOI
  32. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-212257 · DOI
  33. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217018 · DOI
  34. 10.1200/JCO.2017.77.6385 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Khandwala, P., Desai, D., & Lau, A.
Venue
ACR Open Rheumatology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2025-01
Volume
7
Issue
1
ISSN
2578-5745
Cited by
7
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review