The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Growth and Electrochemical Characterization versus Lithium of Fe3O4 Electrodes Made by Electrodeposition
Abstract
Interest in binary oxides has been renewed because of their novel reactivity towards Li at low potential, which leads to large capacity gains. Here, the structural, morphological, and electrochemical properties of copper‐supported Fe 3 O 4 deposits prepared by cathodic reduction of a Fe III chelate in alkaline solution are reported. By tuning the deposit growth parameters, namely the deposition time and the temperature of the electrolytic bath, it is possible to prepare deposits with various morphologies. Thick deposits with well‐faceted particles of Fe 3 O 4 are produced when long deposition times are used; thin and shapeless deposits are formed after shorter electrolysis times. A screening study shows Fe 3 O 4 films prepared at 50 °C under –5 mA cm–2 for 40 s give the best electrochemical performance towards Li, namely with a sustained reversible capacity for over 50 cycles and outstanding rate capability even after 50 repeated charge–discharge sequences. Electrodeposition techniques provide an alternative efficient way to configure high‐performance conversion electrodes based on carbon‐free binary oxides.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Review on recent progress of nanostructured anode materials for Li-ion batteries
Goriparti, S., Miele, E., De Angelis, F., Di Fabrizio, E., Proietti Zaccaria, R., & Capiglia, C. (2014) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.11.103 · Cited by 2,092
Electrode Degradation in Lithium-Ion Batteries
Pender, J. P., Jha, G., Youn, D. H., Ziegler, J. M., Andoni, I., Choi, E. J., Heller, A., Dunn, B. S., Weiss, P. S., Penner, R. M., et al. (2020) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.9b04365 · Cited by 873
Zhang, M., Lei, D., Yin, X., Chen, L., Li, Q., Wang, Y., & Wang, T. (2010) · Journal of Materials Chemistry · doi:10.1039/c0jm00638f · Cited by 300
Metadata
- Authors
- Mitra, S., Poizot, P., Finke, A., & Tarascon, J. ‐.
- Venue
- Advanced Functional Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-09-21
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 2281-2287
- ISSN
- 1616-301X (ISSN-L)
- 1616-3028
- OpenAlex
- W2160245654
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Growth and Electrochemical Characterization versus Lithium of Fe3O4 Electrodes Made by Electrodeposition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adfm.200500753
- The paper
- Mitra, S., Poizot, P., Finke, A., & Tarascon, J. ‐. (2006). Growth and Electrochemical Characterization versus Lithium of Fe3O4 Electrodes Made by Electrodeposition. Advanced Functional Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.200500753
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
