The DOI matches its Crossref record.
“Solvent Annealing” Effect in Polymer Solar Cells Based on Poly(3‐hexylthiophene) and Methanofullerenes
Abstract
The self‐organization of the polymer in solar cells based on regioregular poly(3‐hexylthiophene) (RR‐P3HT):[6,6]‐phenyl C 61‐butyric acid methyl ester (PCBM) is studied systematically as a function of the spin‐coating time ts (varied from 20–80 s), which controls the solvent annealing time ta, the time taken by the solvent to dry after the spin‐coating process. These blend films are characterized by photoluminescence spectroscopy, UV‐vis absorption spectroscopy, atomic force microscopy, and grazing incidence X‐ray diffraction (GIXRD) measurements. The results indicate that the π‐conjugated structure of RR‐P3HT in the films is optimally developed when ta is greater than 1 min (ts ∼ 50 s). For ts < 50 s, both the short‐circuit current (JSC) and the power conversion efficiency (PCE) of the corresponding polymer solar cells show a plateau region, whereas for 50 < ts < 55 s, the JSC and PCE values are significantly decreased, suggesting that there is a major change in the ordering of the polymer in this time window. The PCE decreases from 3.6 % for a film with a highly ordered π‐conjugated structure of RR‐P3HT to 1.2 % for a less‐ordered film. GIXRD results confirm the change in the ordering of the polymer. In particular, the incident photon‐to‐electron conversion efficiency spectrum of the less‐ordered solar cell shows a clear loss in both the overall magnitude and the long‐wavelength response. The solvent annealing effect is also studied for devices with different concentrations of PCBM (PCBM concentrations ranging from 25 to 67 wt %). Under “solvent annealing” conditions, the polymer is seen to be ordered even at 67 wt % PCBM loading. The open‐circuit voltage (VOC) is also affected by the ordering of the polymer and the PCBM loading in the active layer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bulk Heterojunction Solar Cells: Morphology and Performance Relationships
Huang, Y., Kramer, E. J., Heeger, A. J., & Bazan, G. C. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr400353v · Cited by 1,249
Liang, Y., & Yu, L. (2010) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar1000296 · Cited by 697
Dang, M. T., Hirsch, L., Wantz, G., & Wuest, J. D. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr300005u · Cited by 587
Light Harvesting for Organic Photovoltaics
Hedley, G. J., Ruseckas, A., & Samuel, I. D. W. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00215 · Cited by 580
High-performance multiple-donor bulk heterojunction solar cells
Yang, Y. (., Chen, W., Dou, L., Chang, W.-H., Duan, H.-S., Bob, B., Li, G., & Yang, Y. (2015) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2015.9 · Cited by 527
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, G., Yao, Y., Yang, H., Shrotriya, V., Yang, G., & Yang, Y.
- Venue
- Advanced Functional Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-05-18
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1636-1644
- ISSN
- 1616-301X (ISSN-L)
- 1616-3028
- OpenAlex
- W2022983236
- Cited by
- 1,147
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 68.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: “Solvent Annealing” Effect in Polymer Solar Cells Based on Poly(3‐hexylthiophene) and Methanofullerenes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adfm.200600624
- The paper
- Li, G., Yao, Y., Yang, H., Shrotriya, V., Yang, G., & Yang, Y. (2007). “Solvent Annealing” Effect in Polymer Solar Cells Based on Poly(3‐hexylthiophene) and Methanofullerenes. Advanced Functional Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.200600624
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.