Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 276

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Highly Improved Rate Capability for a Lithium‐Ion Battery Nano‐Li4Ti5O12 Negative Electrode via Carbon‐Coated Mesoporous Uniform Pores with a Simple Self‐Assembly Method

Kang, Eunae, Jung, Yoon Seok, Kim, Gi‐Heon, Chun, Jinyoung, Wiesner, Ulrich, Dillon, Anne C., Kim, Jin Kon, Lee, Jinwoo·2011·Advanced Functional Materials

Abstract

A mesostructured spinel Li 4 Ti 5 O 12 (LTO)‐carbon nanocomposite (denoted as Meso‐LTO‐C) with large (>15 nm) and uniform pores is simply synthesized via block copolymer self‐assembly. Exceptionally high rate capability is then demonstrated for Li‐ion battery (LIB) negative electrodes. Polyisoprene‐block‐poly(ethylene oxide) (PI‐b‐PEO) with a sp 2‐hybridized carbon‐containing hydrophobic block is employed as a structure‐directing agent. Then the assembled composite material is crystallized at 700 °C enabling conversion to the spinel LTO structure without loss of structural integrity. Part of the PI is converted to a conductive carbon that coats the pores of the Meso‐LTO‐C. The in situ pyrolyzed carbon not only maintains the porous mesostructure as the LTO is crystallized, but also improves the electronic conductivity. A Meso‐LTO‐C/Li cell then cycles stably at 10 C‐rate, corresponding to only 6 min for complete charge and discharge, with a reversible capacity of 115 mA h g−1 with 90% capacity retention after 500 cycles. In sharp contrast, a Bulk‐LTO/Li cell exhibits only 69 mA h g−1 at 10 C‐rate. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) with symmetric LTO/LTO cells prepared from Bulk‐LTO and Meso‐LTO‐C cycled in different potential ranges reveals the factors contributing to the vast difference between the rate‐capabilities. The carbon‐coated mesoporous structure enables highly improved electronic conductivity and significantly reduced charge transfer resistance, and a much smaller overall resistance is observed compared to Bulk‐LTO. Also, the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI)‐free surface due to the limited voltage window (>1 V versus Li/Li+) contributes to dramatically reduced resistance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/adfm.201101123

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 60 references

Cited by

See all 276

Metadata

Authors
Kang, E., Jung, Y. S., Kim, G., Chun, J., Wiesner, U., Dillon, A. C., Kim, J. K., & Lee, J.
Venue
Advanced Functional Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-09-09
Volume
21
Issue
22
Pages
4349-4357
ISSN
  • 1616-301X (ISSN-L)
  • 1616-3028
OpenAlex
W1965269764
Cited by
276
References
60
FWCI
20.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Highly Improved Rate Capability for a Lithium‐Ion Battery Nano‐Li4Ti5O12 Negative Electrode via Carbon‐Coated Mesoporous Uniform Pores with a Simple Self‐Assembly Method. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adfm.201101123
The paper
Kang, E., Jung, Y. S., Kim, G., Chun, J., Wiesner, U., Dillon, A. C., Kim, J. K., & Lee, J. (2011). Highly Improved Rate Capability for a Lithium‐Ion Battery Nano‐Li4Ti5O12 Negative Electrode via Carbon‐Coated Mesoporous Uniform Pores with a Simple Self‐Assembly Method. Advanced Functional Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201101123

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.