The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Quantification of Quantum Efficiency and Energy Losses in Low Bandgap Polymer:Fullerene Solar Cells with High Open‐Circuit Voltage
Abstract
In organic solar cells based on polymer:fullerene blends, energy is lost due to electron transfer from polymer to fullerene. Minimizing the difference between the energy of the polymer exciton (ED*) and the energy of the charge transfer state (ECT) will optimize the open‐circuit voltage (Voc). In this work, this energy loss ED*‐ECT is measured directly via Fourier‐transform photocurrent spectroscopy and electroluminescence measurements. Polymer:fullerene photovoltaic devices comprising two different isoindigo containing polymers: P3TI and PTI‐1, are studied. Even though the chemical structures and the optical gaps of P3TI and PTI‐1 are similar (1.4 eV–1.5 eV), the optimized photovoltaic devices show large differences in Voc and internal quantum efficiency (IQE). For P3TI:PC 71 BM blends a ED*‐ECT of ∼ 0.1 eV, a Voc of 0.7 V and an IQE of 87% are found. For PTI‐1:PC 61 BM blends an absence of sub‐gap charge transfer absorption and emission bands is found, indicating almost no energy loss in the electron transfer step. Hence a higher Voc of 0.92 V, but low IQE of 45% is obtained. Morphological studies and field dependent photoluminescence quenching indicate that the lower IQE for the PTI‐1 system is not due to a too coarse morphology, but is related to interfacial energetics. Losses between ECT and qVoc due to radiative and non‐radiative recombination are quantified for both material systems, indicating that for the PTI‐1:PC 61 BM material system, Voc can only be increased by decreasing the non‐radiative recombination pathways. This work demonstrates the possibility of obtaining modestly high IQE values for material systems with a small energy offset (<0.1 eV) and a high Voc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Next-generation organic photovoltaics based on non-fullerene acceptors
Cheng, P., Li, G., Zhan, X., & Yang, Y. (2018) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/s41566-018-0104-9 · Cited by 1,905
Organic Photovoltaics over Three Decades
Inganäs, O. (2018) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201800388 · Cited by 708
Self-citationQuantifying Losses in Open-Circuit Voltage in Solution-Processable Solar Cells
Yao, J., Kirchartz, T., Vezie, M. S., Faist, M. A., Gong, W., He, Z., Wu, H., Troughton, J., Watson, T., Bryant, D., et al. (2015) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.4.014020 · Cited by 657
Small is Powerful: Recent Progress in Solution‐Processed Small Molecule Solar Cells
Collins, S. D., Ran, N. A., Heiber, M. C., & Nguyen, T. (2017) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201602242 · Cited by 414
High-efficiency polymer solar cells with small photon energy loss
Kawashima, K., Tamai, Y., Ohkita, H., Osaka, I., & Takimiya, K. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms10085 · Cited by 391
Metadata
- Authors
- Vandewal, K., Ma, Z., Bergqvist, J., Tang, Z., Wang, E., Henriksson, P., Tvingstedt, K., Andersson, M. R., Zhang, F., & Inganäs, O.
- Venue
- Advanced Functional Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-05-07
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 3480-3490
- ISSN
- 1616-301X (ISSN-L)
- 1616-3028
- OpenAlex
- W2146509297
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantification of Quantum Efficiency and Energy Losses in Low Bandgap Polymer:Fullerene Solar Cells with High Open‐Circuit Voltage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adfm.201200608
- The paper
- Vandewal, K., Ma, Z., Bergqvist, J., Tang, Z., Wang, E., Henriksson, P., Tvingstedt, K., Andersson, M. R., Zhang, F., & Inganäs, O. (2012). Quantification of Quantum Efficiency and Energy Losses in Low Bandgap Polymer:Fullerene Solar Cells with High Open‐Circuit Voltage. Advanced Functional Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201200608
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.