Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 207

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Quantification of Quantum Efficiency and Energy Losses in Low Bandgap Polymer:Fullerene Solar Cells with High Open‐Circuit Voltage

Vandewal, Koen, Ma, Zaifei, Bergqvist, Jonas, Tang, Zheng, Wang, Ergang, Henriksson, Patrik, Tvingstedt, Kristofer, Andersson, Mats R., Zhang, Fengling, Inganäs, Olle·2012·Advanced Functional Materials

Abstract

In organic solar cells based on polymer:fullerene blends, energy is lost due to electron transfer from polymer to fullerene. Minimizing the difference between the energy of the polymer exciton (ED*) and the energy of the charge transfer state (ECT) will optimize the open‐circuit voltage (Voc). In this work, this energy loss ED*‐ECT is measured directly via Fourier‐transform photocurrent spectroscopy and electroluminescence measurements. Polymer:fullerene photovoltaic devices comprising two different isoindigo containing polymers: P3TI and PTI‐1, are studied. Even though the chemical structures and the optical gaps of P3TI and PTI‐1 are similar (1.4 eV–1.5 eV), the optimized photovoltaic devices show large differences in Voc and internal quantum efficiency (IQE). For P3TI:PC 71 BM blends a ED*‐ECT of ∼ 0.1 eV, a Voc of 0.7 V and an IQE of 87% are found. For PTI‐1:PC 61 BM blends an absence of sub‐gap charge transfer absorption and emission bands is found, indicating almost no energy loss in the electron transfer step. Hence a higher Voc of 0.92 V, but low IQE of 45% is obtained. Morphological studies and field dependent photoluminescence quenching indicate that the lower IQE for the PTI‐1 system is not due to a too coarse morphology, but is related to interfacial energetics. Losses between ECT and qVoc due to radiative and non‐radiative recombination are quantified for both material systems, indicating that for the PTI‐1:PC 61 BM material system, Voc can only be increased by decreasing the non‐radiative recombination pathways. This work demonstrates the possibility of obtaining modestly high IQE values for material systems with a small energy offset (<0.1 eV) and a high Voc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/adfm.201200608

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 207

Metadata

Authors
Vandewal, K., Ma, Z., Bergqvist, J., Tang, Z., Wang, E., Henriksson, P., Tvingstedt, K., Andersson, M. R., Zhang, F., & Inganäs, O.
Venue
Advanced Functional Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-05-07
Volume
22
Issue
16
Pages
3480-3490
ISSN
  • 1616-301X (ISSN-L)
  • 1616-3028
OpenAlex
W2146509297
Cited by
207
References
0
FWCI
11.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantification of Quantum Efficiency and Energy Losses in Low Bandgap Polymer:Fullerene Solar Cells with High Open‐Circuit Voltage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adfm.201200608
The paper
Vandewal, K., Ma, Z., Bergqvist, J., Tang, Z., Wang, E., Henriksson, P., Tvingstedt, K., Andersson, M. R., Zhang, F., & Inganäs, O. (2012). Quantification of Quantum Efficiency and Energy Losses in Low Bandgap Polymer:Fullerene Solar Cells with High Open‐Circuit Voltage. Advanced Functional Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201200608

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.