Small is Powerful: Recent Progress in Solution‐Processed Small Molecule Solar Cells
Abstract
Over the last 5 years, research on the synthesis, device engineering, and device physics of solution‐processed small molecule solar cells (SMSCs) has rapidly expanded. Improvements in molecular design and emergent device processing techniques have helped solution‐processed SMSCs overcome earlier difficulties in controlling active layer morphology, such that many systems are now at—or approaching—10% power conversion efficiency. In this review, details of the highest performing blend systems are presented in order to identify key trends and provide perspective on current progress in the field. Among the best systems, a planarized molecular structure is prevalent, which can be achieved using large fused‐ring moieties, intermolecular non‐bonding interactions, and side chain engineering. To obtain efficient devices, the highest performing systems have been optimized through the careful combination of thermal and solvent annealing procedures. Even without additional processing, some systems have been able to obtain interconnected morphologies and efficient charge generation and charge transport. Ultimately, the design of more efficient materials also requires additional understanding of the device physics and loss mechanisms. After highlighting what is known to date on processes limiting device efficiency, an outlook on the most important challenges remaining to the field is provided.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The literature also witnesses to the success of 2-(1,1-dicyanomethylene) rhodanine as compared to ethylrhodanine.
“The literature also witnesses to the success of 2-(1,1-dicyanomethylene) rhodanine as compared to ethylrhodanine.”
From Recent progress in porphyrin-based materials for organic solar cells (2018) · cites this paper as [105]
Cites
Exciton diffusion in organic semiconductors
Mikhnenko, O. V., Blom, P. W. M., & Nguyen, T.-Q. (2015) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c5ee00925a · Cited by 997 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Recent progress in porphyrin-based materials for organic solar cells
Mahmood, A., Hu, J.-Y., Xiao, B., Tang, A., Wang, X., & Zhou, E. (2018) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/c8ta06392c · Cited by 311 · see citing works
- Authors
- Collins, S. D., Ran, N. A., Heiber, M. C., & Nguyen, T.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
- Corresponding author
- Nguyen, Thuc‐Quyen
- Venue
- Advanced Energy Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-01-09
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 10
- ISSN
- 1614-6832 (ISSN-L)
- 1614-6840
- OpenAlex
- W2571394977
- Cited by
- 414
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 73 · 2018: 84 · 2017: 45
- FWCI
- 30.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Advanced Energy Materials (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Research
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies
- Keywords
- small molecule solar cells, organic solar cells, solution processing, active layer morphology, non-bonded interactions, side-chain engineering, annealing, solvent annealing, charge transport, power conversion efficiency, device physics, loss mechanisms
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review