Cited by 414Organic Electronics and PhotovoltaicsOrganic Light-Emitting Diodes ResearchPhotochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies

Small is Powerful: Recent Progress in Solution‐Processed Small Molecule Solar Cells

Collins, Samuel D., Ran, Niva A., Heiber, Michael C., Nguyen, Thuc‐Quyen·2017·Advanced Energy Materials

Abstract

Over the last 5 years, research on the synthesis, device engineering, and device physics of solution‐processed small molecule solar cells (SMSCs) has rapidly expanded. Improvements in molecular design and emergent device processing techniques have helped solution‐processed SMSCs overcome earlier difficulties in controlling active layer morphology, such that many systems are now at—or approaching—10% power conversion efficiency. In this review, details of the highest performing blend systems are presented in order to identify key trends and provide perspective on current progress in the field. Among the best systems, a planarized molecular structure is prevalent, which can be achieved using large fused‐ring moieties, intermolecular non‐bonding interactions, and side chain engineering. To obtain efficient devices, the highest performing systems have been optimized through the careful combination of thermal and solvent annealing procedures. Even without additional processing, some systems have been able to obtain interconnected morphologies and efficient charge generation and charge transport. Ultimately, the design of more efficient materials also requires additional understanding of the device physics and loss mechanisms. After highlighting what is known to date on processes limiting device efficiency, an outlook on the most important challenges remaining to the field is provided.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/aenm.201602242

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The literature also witnesses to the success of 2-(1,1-dicyanomethylene) rhodanine as compared to ethylrhodanine.

    “The literature also witnesses to the success of 2-(1,1-dicyanomethylene) rhodanine as compared to ethylrhodanine.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Collins, S. D., Ran, N. A., Heiber, M. C., & Nguyen, T.
Affiliations
University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
Corresponding author
Nguyen, Thuc‐Quyen
Venue
Advanced Energy Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-01-09
Volume
7
Issue
10
ISSN
  • 1614-6832 (ISSN-L)
  • 1614-6840
OpenAlex
W2571394977
Cited by
414
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 73 · 2018: 84 · 2017: 45
FWCI
30.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Advanced Energy Materials (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Research
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies
Keywords
small molecule solar cells, organic solar cells, solution processing, active layer morphology, non-bonded interactions, side-chain engineering, annealing, solvent annealing, charge transport, power conversion efficiency, device physics, loss mechanisms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review