Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 271

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nanoporous Nitrogen‐Doped Graphene Oxide/Nickel Sulfide Composite Sheets Derived from a Metal‐Organic Framework as an Efficient Electrocatalyst for Hydrogen and Oxygen Evolution

Jayaramulu, Kolleboyina, Masa, Justus, Tomanec, Ondrej, Peeters, Daniel, Ranc, Vaclav, Schneemann, Andreas, Zboril, Radek, Schuhmann, Wolfgang, Fischer, Roland A.·2017·Advanced Functional Materials

Abstract

Engineering of controlled hybrid nanocomposites creates one of the most exciting applications in the fields of energy materials and environmental science. The rational design and in situ synthesis of hierarchical porous nanocomposite sheets of nitrogen‐doped graphene oxide (NGO) and nickel sulfide (Ni 7 S 6) derived from a hybrid of a well‐known nickel‐based metal‐organic framework (NiMOF‐74) using thiourea as a sulfur source are reported here. The nanoporous NGO/MOF composite is prepared through a solvothermal process in which Ni(II) metal centers of the MOF structure are chelated with nitrogen and oxygen functional groups of NGO. NGO/Ni 7 S 6 exhibits bifunctional activity, capable of catalyzing both the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) and the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) with excellent stability in alkaline electrolytes, due to its high surface area, high pore volume, and tailored reaction interface enabling the availability of active nickel sites, mass transport, and gas release. Depending on the nitrogen doping level, the properties of graphene oxide can be tuned toward, e.g., enhanced stability of the composite compared to commonly used RuO 2 under OER conditions. Hence, this work opens the door for the development of effective OER/HER electrocatalysts based on hierarchical porous graphene oxide composites with metal chalcogenides, which may replace expensive commercial catalysts such as RuO 2 and IrO 2.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/adfm.201700451

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 271

Metadata

Authors
Jayaramulu, K., Masa, J., Tomanec, O., Peeters, D., Ranc, V., Schneemann, A., Zboril, R., Schuhmann, W., & Fischer, R. A.
Venue
Advanced Functional Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-07-03
Volume
27
Issue
33
ISSN
  • 1616-301X (ISSN-L)
  • 1616-3028
OpenAlex
W2732165182
Cited by
271
References
7
FWCI
8.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nanoporous Nitrogen‐Doped Graphene Oxide/Nickel Sulfide Composite Sheets Derived from a Metal‐Organic Framework as an Efficient Electrocatalyst for Hydrogen and Oxygen Evolution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adfm.201700451
The paper
Jayaramulu, K., Masa, J., Tomanec, O., Peeters, D., Ranc, V., Schneemann, A., Zboril, R., Schuhmann, W., & Fischer, R. A. (2017). Nanoporous Nitrogen‐Doped Graphene Oxide/Nickel Sulfide Composite Sheets Derived from a Metal‐Organic Framework as an Efficient Electrocatalyst for Hydrogen and Oxygen Evolution. Advanced Functional Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201700451

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.