Cited by 854Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionCO2 Reduction Techniques and CatalystsCatalytic Processes in Materials Science

Amorphous Cobalt Boride (Co 2 B) as a Highly Efficient Nonprecious Catalyst for Electrochemical Water Splitting: Oxygen and Hydrogen Evolution

Masa, Justus, Weide, Philipp, Peeters, Daniel, Sinev, Ilya, Xia, Wei, Sun, Zhenyu, Somsen, Christoph, Muhler, Martin +1 more·2016·Advanced Energy Materials

Abstract

It is demonstrated that amorphous cobalt boride (Co 2 B) prepared by the chemical reduction of CoCl 2 using NaBH 4 is an exceptionally efficient electrocatalyst for the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) in alkaline electrolytes and is simultaneously active for catalyzing the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER). The catalyst achieves a current density of 10 mA cm −2 at 1.61 V on an inert support and at 1.59 V when impregnated with nitrogen‐doped graphene. Stable performance is maintained at 10 mA cm −2 for at least 60 h. The optimized catalyst, Co 2 B annealed at 500 °C (Co 2 B‐500) evolves oxygen more efficiently than RuO 2 and IrO 2 , and its performance matches the best cobalt‐based catalysts reported to date. Co 2 B is irreversibly oxidized at OER conditions to form a CoOOH surface layer. The active form of the catalyst is therefore represented as CoOOH/Co 2 B. EXAFS observations indicate that boron induces lattice strain in the crystal structure of the metal, which potentially diminishes the thermodynamic and kinetic barrier of the hydroxylation reaction, formation of the OOH* intermediate, a key limiting step in the OER.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/aenm.201502313

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The operation voltage of the Au-Rh-aerogel-based electrolyzer is smaller than for most previously reported electrocatalysts in alkaline medium (1.51-1.81 V).

    “The obtained operation voltage of the Au–Rh-aerogel-based electrolyzer is also smaller than for most previously reported electrocatalysts in alkaline medium (1.51–1.81 V).[35–38]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Masa, J., Weide, P., Peeters, D., Sinev, I., Xia, W., Sun, Z., Somsen, C., Muhler, M., & Schuhmann, W.
Affiliations
Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Masa, Justus
  • Schuhmann, Wolfgang
Venue
Advanced Energy Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-01-07
Volume
6
Issue
6
ISSN
  • 1614-6832 (ISSN-L)
  • 1614-6840
OpenAlex
W2227328155
Cited by
854
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 66 · 2023: 81 · 2022: 87 · 2021: 92 · 2020: 118 · 2019: 113 · 2018: 104 · 2017: 93 · 2016: 20
FWCI
29.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Advanced Energy Materials (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • DFG (EXC1069)
  • Helmholtz-Energie-Allianz “Stationäre elektrochemische Speicher und Wandler” (HA-E-0002)
  • Ruhr-Universität Research Department IFSC
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
Keywords
Co2B, oxygen evolution reaction, hydrogen evolution reaction, electrocatalysis, non-noble metal catalysts, alkaline electrolyte, nitrogen-doped graphene, EXAFS, water splitting, catalyst stability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review