Cited by 384Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionAdvanced battery technologies researchSupercapacitor Materials and Fabrication

CuCo Bimetallic Oxide Quantum Dot Decorated Nitrogen‐Doped Carbon Nanotubes: A High‐Efficiency Bifunctional Oxygen Electrode for Zn–Air Batteries

Cheng, Hui, Li, Mei‐Ling, Su, Chang‐Yuan, Li, Nan, Liu, Zhao‐Qing·2017·Advanced Functional Materials

Abstract

The large‐scale production of metal–air batteries, an appealing solution for next‐generation energy storage, requires low‐cost, earth‐abundant, and efficient oxygen electrode materials, yet insights into active catalyst structures and synergistic reactivity remain largely unknown. Here, a new bifunctional oxygen electrode based on nitrogen‐doped carbon nanotubes decorated by spinel CuCo2O4 quantum dots (CuCo2O4/N‐CNTs) is reported, outperforming the benchmark of state‐of‐the‐art noble metal catalysts. Combining spectroscopic characterization and electrochemical studies, a prominent synergetic effect between CuCo2O4 and N‐doped carbon nanotubes is uncovered: the high conductivity, large active surface area, and increase in the number of catalytic sites induced by Cu doping (i.e., Cu2+ and CuN) can be beneficial to the overall electrocatalytic activities. Remarkably, the native flexibility of CuCo2O4/N‐CNTs allows its direct use as reversible oxygen electrodes in Zn–air batteries either with liquid alkaline electrolyte or in the all‐solid‐state configuration. The prepared devices demonstrate excellent discharging/charging performance, large energy density (83.83 mW cm−2 in liquid state, 1.86 W g−1 in all‐solid‐state), and long lifetime (48 h in liquid state, 9 h in all‐solid‐state), holding great promise in the practical application of rechargeable metal–air batteries and other fuel cells.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/adfm.201701833

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cheng, H., Li, M., Su, C., Li, N., & Liu, Z.
Affiliations
  • Guangzhou University (CN)
  • School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering/Guangzhou Key Laboratory for Environmentally Functional Materials and Technology Guangzhou University Guangzhou Higher Education Mega Center Waihuan Xi Road No. 230 Guangzhou 510006 P. R. China
Corresponding author
Liu, Zhao‐Qing
Venue
Advanced Functional Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-07-03
Volume
27
Issue
30
ISSN
  • 1616-301X (ISSN-L)
  • 1616-3028
OpenAlex
W2724326477
Cited by
384
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 75 · 2019: 66 · 2018: 71 · 2017: 7
FWCI
16.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Advanced Functional Materials (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (21576056, 21576057)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2014A030313520, 2015A030313503)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced battery technologies research
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication
Keywords
nitrogen-doped carbon nanotubes, bifunctional oxygen electrocatalysts, zinc-air batteries, metal-air batteries, spinel oxides, copper doping, synergistic effect, all-solid-state batteries, alkaline electrolyte, energy density

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review