The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Progress of the Interface Design in All‐Solid‐State Li–S Batteries
Abstract
Lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries are one of the most promising next‐generation battery types for their high energy density and low cost. On the other hand, safety issues and poor cyclability strongly limit practical application. Solid‐state electrolytes (SSEs) can present as high ionic conductivity as aprotic electrolytes and eventually avoid the shuttle effect, which provides an ultimate solution for safe Li–S batteries with good cyclability. In this review, the recent achievements in all‐solid‐state Li–S batteries based on inorganic SSEs are summarized. Furthermore, the main attentions are paid to the interfaces, including metallic lithium|SSEs, SSEs|SSEs, and composite sulfur cathode|SSEs. The potential approaches to deal with these interfacial issues are proposed as well, such as composite SSEs with an asymmetric structure to enhance their compatibility with lithium anodes and sulfur cathodes, adding Li 2 O or LiF and increasing the densification to reduce the grain boundary resistance, and nanomaterials used to improve the kinetic process in cathode.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Opportunities and challenges for a sustainable energy future
Chu, S., & Majumdar, A. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11475 · Cited by 12,550
Li-O2 and Li-S batteries with high energy storage
Bruce, P. G., Freunberger, S. A., Hardwick, L. J., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2012) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat3191 · Cited by 9,479
Electrolytes and Interphases in Li-Ion Batteries and Beyond
Xu, K. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500003w · Cited by 5,566
A solid future for battery development
Janek, J., & Zeier, W. G. (2016) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/nenergy.2016.141 · Cited by 3,979
Interface Stability in Solid-State Batteries
Richards, W. D., Miara, L. J., Wang, Y., Kim, J. C., & Ceder, G. (2016) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b04082 · Cited by 1,652
Cited by
Interface engineering toward stable lithium–sulfur batteries
Guo, Y., Niu, Q., Pei, F., Wang, Q., Zhang, Y., Du, L., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y., Fan, L., et al. (2024) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d3ee04183b · Cited by 322
Self-citationThe 2021 battery technology roadmap
Ma, J., Li, Y., Grundish, N. S., Goodenough, J. B., Chen, Y., Guo, L., Peng, Z., Qi, X., Yang, F., Qie, L., et al. (2021) · Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6463/abd353 · Cited by 269
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Yue, J., Yan, M., Yin, Y., & Guo, Y.
- Venue
- Advanced Functional Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-03-08
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 38
- ISSN
- 1616-301X (ISSN-L)
- 1616-3028
- OpenAlex
- W2789638551
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 11.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Progress of the Interface Design in All‐Solid‐State Li–S Batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adfm.201707533
- The paper
- Yue, J., Yan, M., Yin, Y., & Guo, Y. (2018). Progress of the Interface Design in All‐Solid‐State Li–S Batteries. Advanced Functional Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201707533
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.