The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nickel@Nickel Oxide Core–Shell Electrode with Significantly Boosted Reactivity for Ultrahigh‐Energy and Stable Aqueous Ni–Zn Battery
Abstract
The main bottlenecks of aqueous rechargeable Ni–Zn batteries are their relatively low energy density and poor cycling stability, mainly arising from the low capacity and inferior reversibility of the current Ni‐based cathodes. Additionally, the complicated and difficult‐to‐scale preparation procedures of these cathodes are not promising for large‐scale energy storage. Here, a facile and cost‐effective ultrasonic‐assisted strategy is developed to efficiently activate commercial Ni foam as a robust cathode for a high‐energy and stable aqueous rechargeable Ni–Zn battery. 3D Ni@NiO core–shell electrode with remarkably boosted reactivity and an area of 300 cm 2 is readily obtained by this ultrasonic‐assisted activation method (denoted as SANF). Benefiting from the in situ formation of electrochemically active NiO and porous 3D structure with a large surface area, the as‐fabricated SANF//Zn battery presents ultrahigh capacity (0.422 mA h cm−2) and excellent cycling durability (92.5% after 1800 cycles). Moreover, this aqueous rechargeable SANF//Zn battery achieves an impressive energy density of 15.1 mW h cm−3 (0.754 mW h cm−2) and a peak power density of 1392 mW cm−3, outperforming most reported aqueous rechargeable energy‐storage devices. These findings may provide valuable insights into designing large‐scale and high‐performance 3D electrodes for aqueous rechargeable batteries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Where do batteries end and supercapacitors begin?
Simon, P., Gogotsi, Y., & Dunn, B. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1249625 · Cited by 5,634
Huang, Y., Ip, W. S., Lau, Y. Y., Sun, J., Zeng, J., Yeung, N. S. S., Ng, W. S., Li, H., Pei, Z., Xue, Q., et al. (2017) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.7b03322 · Cited by 352
Cited by
Rechargeable Batteries for Grid Scale Energy Storage
Zhu, Z., Jiang, T., Ali, M., Meng, Y., Jin, Y., Cui, Y., & Chen, W. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00289 · Cited by 1,769
An Aqueous Rechargeable Zinc‐Organic Battery with Hybrid Mechanism
Wan, F., Zhang, L., Wang, X., Bi, S., Niu, Z., & Chen, J. (2018) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201804975 · Cited by 674
Zhou, J., Xie, M., Wu, F., Mei, Y., Hao, Y., Huang, R., Wei, G., Liu, A., Li, L., & Chen, R. (2021) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202101649 · Cited by 600
Flexible Zn‐Ion Batteries: Recent Progresses and Challenges
Yu, P., Zeng, Y., Zhang, H., Yu, M., Tong, Y., & Lu, X. (2019) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.201804760 · Cited by 566
Self-citationRecent Advances of Aqueous Rechargeable Zinc‐Iodine Batteries: Challenges, Solutions, and Prospects
Lin, D., & Li, Y. (2022) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202108856 · Cited by 470
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, R., Han, Y., Wang, Z., Jiang, J., Tong, Y., & Lu, X.
- Venue
- Advanced Functional Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-05-21
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 29
- ISSN
- 1616-301X (ISSN-L)
- 1616-3028
- OpenAlex
- W2803366169
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nickel@Nickel Oxide Core–Shell Electrode with Significantly Boosted Reactivity for Ultrahigh‐Energy and Stable Aqueous Ni–Zn Battery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adfm.201802157
- The paper
- Wang, R., Han, Y., Wang, Z., Jiang, J., Tong, Y., & Lu, X. (2018). Nickel@Nickel Oxide Core–Shell Electrode with Significantly Boosted Reactivity for Ultrahigh‐Energy and Stable Aqueous Ni–Zn Battery. Advanced Functional Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201802157
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.