The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Molecular Engineering of Donor–Acceptor Conjugated Polymer/g‐C3N4 Heterostructures for Significantly Enhanced Hydrogen Evolution Under Visible‐Light Irradiation
Abstract
Polymer heterojunctions (PHJs) have emerged as promising photocatalysts for the photocatalytic hydrogen evolution (PHE). Nevertheless, most PHJs exhibit unsatisfactory hydrogen evolution rate (HER), primarily attributing to their own high‐energy Frenkel excitons and poor light capturing ability. In this paper, a molecular engineering strategy is developed to further broaden spectral response range and simultaneously accelerate Frenkel excitons dissociation within PHJs. For this purpose, three donor–acceptor (D‐A) conjugated polymers/g‐C 3 N 4 heterojunctions with alternative donor units (fluorene, carbazole, N‐annulated perylene for P1, P2, and P3, respectively) and the invariant acceptor unit (benzothiadiazole) have been designed and fabricated for efficient PHE. Experimental results show that copolymerizing different donor units into the polymer skeleton not only extends the visible‐light response range but also promotes photoexciton separation within polymer/g‐C 3 N 4 PHJs. Notably, copolymerizing the strongest electron donor unit (N‐annulated perylene) achieves the best light capture ability and the most effective photoexcitation separation of the P3/g‐C 3 N 4, leading to significantly increase HRE of 13.0 mmol h−1 g−1 with a recorded apparent quantum yield of 27.32% at 520 nm. Importantly, the Type II heterojunction mechanism within P3/CN was first proved by theoretical calculation. This work provides a promising strategy for reasonably developing efficient PHJs for solar fuel production.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Walter, M. G., Warren, E. L., McKone, J. R., Boettcher, S. W., Mi, Q., Santori, E. A., & Lewis, N. S. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr1002326 · Cited by 9,388
Semiconductor-based Photocatalytic Hydrogen Generation
Chen, X., Shen, S., Guo, L., & Mao, S. S. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr1001645 · Cited by 7,876
Cited by
Tan, M., Ma, Y., Yu, C., Luan, Q., Li, J., Liu, C., Dong, W., Su, Y., Qiao, L., Gao, L., et al. (2022) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.202111740 · Cited by 394
Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., Gao, C., Ni, Z., Zhang, X., Hu, W., & Dong, H. (2023) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d2cs00720g · Cited by 293
Metadata
- Authors
- Yu, F., Wang, Z., Zhang, S., Ye, H., Kong, K., Gong, X., Hua, J., & Tian, H.
- Venue
- Advanced Functional Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-10-10
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 47
- ISSN
- 1616-301X (ISSN-L)
- 1616-3028
- OpenAlex
- W2896430933
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular Engineering of Donor–Acceptor Conjugated Polymer/g‐C3N4 Heterostructures for Significantly Enhanced Hydrogen Evolution Under Visible‐Light Irradiation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adfm.201804512
- The paper
- Yu, F., Wang, Z., Zhang, S., Ye, H., Kong, K., Gong, X., Hua, J., & Tian, H. (2018). Molecular Engineering of Donor–Acceptor Conjugated Polymer/g‐C3N4 Heterostructures for Significantly Enhanced Hydrogen Evolution Under Visible‐Light Irradiation. Advanced Functional Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201804512
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.