Cited by 380Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionCO2 Reduction Techniques and CatalystsAdvanced Photocatalysis Techniques

Homologous CoP/NiCoP Heterostructure on N‐Doped Carbon for Highly Efficient and pH‐Universal Hydrogen Evolution Electrocatalysis

Boppella, Ramireddy, Tan, Jeiwan, Yang, Wooseok, Moon, Jooho·2019·Advanced Functional Materials

Abstract

Hydrogen evolution electrocatalysts can achieve sustainable hydrogen production via electrocatalytic water splitting; however, designing highly active and stable noble‐metal‐free hydrogen evolution electrocatalysts that perform as efficiently as Pt catalysts over a wide pH range is a challenging task. Herein, a new 2D cobalt phosphide/nickelcobalt phosphide (CoP/NiCoP) hybrid nanosheet network is proposed, supported on an N‐doped carbon (NC) matrix as a highly efficient and durable pH‐universal hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) electrocatalyst. It is derived from topological transformation of corresponding layer double hydroxides and graphitic carbon nitride. This 2D CoP/NiCoP/NC catalyst exhibits versatile HER electroactivity with very low overpotentials of 75, 60, and 123 mV in 1 m KOH, 0.5 m H 2 SO 4 , and 1 m PBS electrolytes, respectively, delivering a current density of 10 mA cm −2 for HER. Such impressive HER performance of the hybrid electrocatalyst is mainly attributed to the collective effects of electronic structure engineering, strong interfacial coupling between CoP and NiCoP in heterojunction, an enlarged surface area/exposed catalytic active sites due to the 2D morphology, and conductive NC support. This method is believed to provide a basis for the development of efficient 2D electrode materials with various electrochemical applications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/adfm.201807976

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boppella, R., Tan, J., Yang, W., & Moon, J.
Affiliations
Yonsei University (KR)
Corresponding author
Moon, Jooho
Venue
Advanced Functional Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-12-13
Volume
29
Issue
6
ISSN
  • 1616-301X (ISSN-L)
  • 1616-3028
OpenAlex
W2904135604
Cited by
380
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 73 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 23
FWCI
9.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Advanced Functional Materials (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Research Foundation of Korea (2012R1A3A2026417)
  • Ministry of Science ICT and Future Planning
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques
Keywords
hydrogen evolution reaction, cobalt phosphide, nitrogen-doped carbon, heterostructures, pH-universal electrocatalysis, noble-metal-free electrocatalysts, layered double hydroxides, graphitic carbon nitride, interfacial coupling, electronic structure engineering, water splitting, electrochemical hydrogen production

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review